artykuły |
1.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Zygmunt Hajduk
Zygmunt Hajduk
Filozofia przyrody:
preliminaria
The Philosophy of Nature
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The paper constitutes part of some more comprehensive textbook and embraces several introductory issues concerning philosophy of nature. I examine first different notions of this philosophical discipline used in various historically relevant contexts. Later on, I present reasons for claiming the philosophy of nature revival nowadays. Some aspects of its update are examined: the traditional and contemporary aims; roles related to different conceptions of the natural philosophy; its main stages of progressive change followed by its central categories. These developments have been accompanied by the growing view that philosophy of nature has become sufficiently justified in existence.
|
|
|
2.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Zenon Eugeniusz Roskal
Zenon Eugeniusz Roskal
Filozofia przyrody w europejskiej tradycji filozoficznej
Philosophy of Nature in the European Philosophical Tradition
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The article presents the main concepts of the philosophy of nature (Aristotelian, Cartesian, Kantian. Hegelian etc.) which emerges in the European philosophical tradition in the period from the origins of philosophy of nature (Milesian philosophy of nature) to Hegel’s philosophy of nature. Some attention is also devoted to the most obvious and most influential problem relation between philosophy (philosophy of nature) and empirical science, which arises from historical and philosophical attempts of reconstructing the genesis of modern experimental science.
|
|
|
3.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Tomasz Michniowski
Tomasz Michniowski
Zagadnienie cząstki elementarnej w fizyce i w kosmologii
The Problem of Elementary Particle in Physics and Cosmology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In the paper one discusses historical aspect o f the ’elementary particle problem’. Understanding of it is important for development of modern physics in both local, as well as cosmological scale. At the end of 20-th century, importance of the issue comes to be of fundamental kind because of its strict connections with civilizational increase. The problem has been discussed at possible wide area of scientific properties and some important questions, which science will have to answer in nearest future.
|
|
|
4.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Marzena Dybkowska
Marzena Dybkowska
Rodzaje paradygmatów metodologicznych w geologii
Types of the Methodological Paradigms in Geology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The categories of paradigm and of revolution according to Polikarov (1993) are applied to the history of the methodology of geology. Three paradigms are distinguished: 1° the system of the Earth created by James Hutton; 2° Charles Lyell’s uniformitarianism as a complex and developed structure; 3° the modified principle of geological actualism. Changes of succesive methodological paradigms in geology were revolutionary in their character. The following kinds of revolutions are distinguished. The establishment of the Huttonian theory of the Earth, regarded as the fundamental theoretical system, was the first. Transitions from the paradigm 1° to 2° and from the paradigm 2° to 3° are considered as revolutions, although with considerable continuity namely the principle of actualism was common for the paradigms 1°-3° though the meaning of this term was different at different times.
|
|
|
5.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Krzysztof Sleziński
Krzysztof Sleziński
Wybrane argumenty Rogera Penrose'a na rzecz platonizmu
Selected Arguments of Roger Penrose for Platonism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
While presenting an interpretation of numerous problems of mathematics, physics and biology, Roger Penrose developed a philosophical idea, which is in some ways compatible with the philosophy of Plato. The arguments are classified as follows:- Platonic existence of mathematical objects,- existence of reason for the accord between the mathematical world and the physical world,- non-algorithmic nature of mathematical insight.- existence of non-recursive physical processes.The problems Penrose discusses pose questions, which do not have one and unambiguous answer. However, the importance of Penrose’s contribution to philosophy is the outline of rational and critical perspective of particular sciences and philosophy itself.
|
|
|
6.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Dariusz Dąbek
Dariusz Dąbek
Historyczno-filozoficzny kontekst kosmologii Edwarda Arthura Milne’a
Historical and Philosophical Context of Edward Arthur Milne’s Cosmology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This is a two-part paper. The first part describes the direct influence of five philosophical assumptions adopted by Milne, which shaped up his Kinematic Relativity and cosmology theories. The first three of his assumptions were of epistemological nature: deductive method of constructing a scientific theory; gaining „insight into phenomena”, and a simplicity postulate (cosmological principle). The two latter ones were of ontological nature; they related to problems of time and space.The second part of this paper deals with Milne’s own critical judgment of the basis of general relativity, which was deeply rooted in his philosophical assumptions. Especially heavy criticism fell on the simplicity postulate, which directly or indirectly led to the following: 1) rejection of curved space and choosing Euclid’s version, 2) criticism of a nonsensical, according to Milne, notion of „expanding space”, 3) non-acceptance of close correlation between space and matter, 4) adoption of his own idea of time and space and, as a result, rejection of notion of space-time, 5) rejection of General Relativity because of too complex mathematical equations.Milne did not stop at criticising Einstein’s theory, but also undertook the task of constructing his own theory, totally opposed to the General Relativity. It so happened therefore, that his philosophical assumptions became foundations of a new, original natural theory, which should have - according to the view of its author - indicated a better way to build a physical knowledge and a more efficient way to understand the Universe.
|
|
|
materiały |
7.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Zygmunt Hajduk
Zygmunt Hajduk
Filozofia nauki (Aktualne tendencje badawcze)
Filozofia nauki (Aktualne tendencje badawcze)
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Józef Zon
Józef Zon
Metodologiczne aspekty kontrowersji: ewolucjonizm - kreacjonizm
Metodologiczne aspekty kontrowersji: ewolucjonizm - kreacjonizm
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Zenon Eugeniusz Roskal
Zenon Eugeniusz Roskal
Atom. Od greckiej filozofii przyrody do nauki współczesnej
Atom. Od greckiej filozofii przyrody do nauki współczesnej
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
promemoria |
10.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 3
Marian Wnuk
Marian Wnuk
Pamięci Księdza Profesora Kazimierza Kloskowskiego (1953-1999)
Pamięci Księdza Profesora Kazimierza Kloskowskiego (1953-1999)
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
artykuły |
11.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Zofia J. Zdybicka
Zofia J. Zdybicka
Drogi poznania Boga według encykliki Fides et ratio
Ways of Learning about God according to the Encyclical Fides et ratio
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The encyclical makes an analysis of the situation of the contemporary culture in which a crisis of the truth about man has occurred as well as a crisis of the meaning of human life that is connected with it. The deformities are first of all concerned with recognising the truth about God and the relations between Him and man. Hence the aim of the encyclical is to point out that „man cannot be understood without God”, and what is more, „man cannot be understood without Christ”.The problem of learning about God then has a clearly anthropological context in the encyclical. It points to two complementary ways to learn about God as the ultimate source of existence and of the Supreme Good that makes human life meaningful:1) the way of reason, through learning about the existing reality and explaining it (philosophy)2) the way of faith, that is, the way of the reason thinking while believing that God’s word is true; in it God shows truths about Himself and about man that exceed man’s cognitive abilities.Hence full cognition of the truth about God and about man as significantly connected with Him requires two kinds of cognition. Fides et ratio expresses this in a simple way: „man is a creature in quest of the truth”, he is „a philosopher by nature” and one „whose life is based on faith”. Hence man can „on the wings of reason and faith rise to contemplating the truth”. Both these ways are ways of the truth concerning the existing reality; be it natural or supernatural. When a man recognises and lives through them both they can show him the ultimate meaning of life.
|
|
|
12.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Krzysztof Kaucha
Krzysztof Kaucha
Uzasadnianie przekonań religijnych chrześcijan:
Peter van Inwagen a teologia fundamentalna
Justification for Christian Beliefs
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The article is focused on Theological Philosophy constructed by Peter van Inwagen and modern Fundamental Theology which has been cultivated at KUL. Both disciplines try to present reasonable justification for Christian fundamental convictions. P. van Inwagen − specially in his book God, Knowledge, and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology − knowing well modern philosophy and the mentality of people living today tries to legitimate the main Christian beliefs. He writes about how Christians can justify the existence of personal God, he legitimates the authority of the Bible (which is questionable according to some scientific theories) and he defends the specific position of the Christian Church among other religions. In conclusion he suggests that Christian beliefs are not certain for non-Christians but it does not mean that they are not reasonable and acceptable. Fundamental Theology cultivated at KUL is very similiar to P. van Inwagen’s project in some points. But in some other aspects his position should be deepened.
|
|
|
13.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Alfred Wierzbicki
Alfred Wierzbicki
Etyka a eudajmonologia
Ethics, and Eudaimonology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Along the history of ethics there is a controversy concerning the subject-matter of ethics itself − is it focused on the ways of fulfilling one’s life (happiness) or is it the normative theory of the moral duty? The author of the paper takes into considerations three concepts of ethics which were developed by Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas and Antonio Rosmini.The classical model of replacing ethics by eudaimonology is presented by Aristotle. Eudaimonism is connected in his philosophy of the human praxis with conceiveing of good in terms of the end of human action (teleological concept of good). Eudaimonia consists in fulfillment of the human life as a whole. Therefore the ultimate end of the human life is understood as the immanent end of the human nature. Aristotle identifies the moral good with the good of the human nature (natural fallacy in ethics).On the one hand the ethics of St. Thomas is dependent on the eudaimonistic views of Aristotle and on the other hand it goes beyond naturalism by pointing out the transcendent ultimate end of the human life which is idendified with God. In his theological thought St. Thomas Aquinas seeks to develop personalism. The good of person is the reason for an attitude of love on which the community of persons is founded. Because of the presence of the eudaimonistic and personalistic elements the ethics of Aquinas remains metodologically inconsistent.Antonio Rosmini thanks to his inspiration by the ethical thought of I. Kant distinguishes two diffrent practical sciences: eudaimonology and ethics. He refuses, however, Kantian apriorism and acognitivism. The moral duty is justified by the data of the moral experience. For the essence of morality consists in recognition of a being in accordance with its axiological order. Eudaimonology deals with the subjective good which is related to the nature of subject and only ethics discovers the moral obligation of affirming good for its own sake (objective good).
|
|
|
14.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Barbara Chyrowicz
Barbara Chyrowicz
Bioetyka czy bioetyki?:
O możliwości konsensu w bioetyce
Bioethics: One or Many?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The birth of bioethics as a distinct branch of applied ethics is connected with extremely intensive extension of biomedical sciences in the second half of the 20th century. The problems which are connected with practical application of the achievements in contemporary medicine are not only of pragmatic but also of ethical character. The moral nature of these problems is specifically dealt with by bioethics. The interdisciplinary character of the research carried out in the field of bioethical analyses provokes a set of methodological problems; firstly, the problem of the nature and definition of bioethics. The development of bioethics is accompanied by a diversity of standpoints, often excluding each other. The authors who represent these mutually-excluding standpoints accept, at the point of departure, different ethical and anthropological principles. Thus we do not speak about one bioethics, but rather about many bioethical theories. The pluralism of bioethical standpoints is seen by some authors as an inheritance of postmodernism, some others are trying to look for general and universal bioethical principles. Such a consensus appears impossible due to the diversity of the conceptions of the person in contemporary bioethics. So the consensus in bioethics should be looked for rather in the field of anthropology.
|
|
|
15.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik
Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik
Sądy moralne jako konstytutywny element badania naukowego
Moral Judgements as a Constitutive Element of Scientific Research
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The paper aims at answering the question of whether scientists qua scientists pass moral judgements. My answer is: “yes”. I claim that moral judgements are necessary for advancing science and that they may even belong to the content of science. This fact threatens neither rationality nor objectivity of science. On the contrary − pretending that science is morally neutral distorts it. I develop two arguments for my theses. First, against the background of the ideal of value-free science I show that value-judgements are constitutive for science. This ideal is not tenable when we consider science as human activity. By analyzing cases of research I then show that in applied sciences both methodological and moral judgements are necessary for any successful inquiry. The structure of scientific research allows me to extend this claim to science in general. Secondly, by considering science as governed by practical − not instrumental − rationality I show that moral judgements, which evaluate actions constitutive of any research as “permissible”, have their source in this rationality. Without them rationality, freedom, and autonomy of science are endangered.
|
|
|
16.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Piotr Jaroszyński
Piotr Jaroszyński
U źródeł nauki − THEORÍA
At the Sources of Science − THEORÍA
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In the article, the author presents certain aspects concerning the constitution of science as a distinct domain of culture. Although civilizations antedating Greek civilization had many importantachievements that today we would call scientific, science itself as having a definite object, method and aim appeared first in Greece. In Babylon and Egypt science had purely practical aims, such as counting and astrology. Among the Greeks, science possessed a theoretical dimension. The Greek concept of THEORIA signified science as well as the highest type of life man could achieve, the BIOS THEORETIKOS. Human knowledge progresses through stages. It passes through a phase where it has much in common with the knowledge possessed by brute animals, based on sensation and memory. At a later and higher phase, human knowledge is characterized by a more comprehensive experience than mere memory of facts, then by art, and finally by science, the crowning point of which is wisdom (philosophy).
|
|
|
17.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Francesca Rivetti Barbò
Francesca Rivetti Barbò
Liberté et vérité:
Du savoir commun à la philosophie
Wolność i prawda
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Społeczeństwa zachodnie stają się coraz bardziej wielokulturowe i występuje w nich wiele różnorodnych koncepcji wolności. Jest to przejaw kryzysu kultury zachodniej. Równocześnie jest to także jedna z przyczyn tego kryzysu.Zdaniem autorki artykułu kryzys ten może być przezwyciężony poprzez prawdę. Trzeba więc obecnie formować nową kulturę − kulturę prawdy, zakorzenioną w mądrości filozoficznej i chrześcijańskiej. Tylko „kultura prawdy” może być fundamentem „cywilizacji miłości”.Poznanie prawdy o ludzkiej wolności domaga się prawdy dotyczącej całej rzeczywistości, a więc prawdy, jaką można zdobyć w filozofii wzmocnionej prawdą objawioną przez Chrystusa. W filozofii poznajemy, że Bóg jest Stwórcą całego świata, jest Miłością − Dawcą bytu, prawdy, dobra i piękna.Ostatecznie więc wolność dana jest człowiekowi przez Boga, abyśmy jako osoby − mężczyźni czy kobiety − osiągnęli pełny rozwój.Fundamentem ludzkiej wolności jest więc Bóg, który stworzył wszystko, co istnieje, co jest pomyślane przez Boga-Najwyższą Prawdę i dzięki temu posiada własną „prawdę ontologiczną". Rzeczywistość jest także chciana przez Boga-Najwyższe Dobro i dzięki temu wszystko jest dobre i możemy je kochać. Rzeczywistość stworzona jest także przez Boga-Najwyższe Piękno i dlatego wszystko, co istnieje, jest piękne i możemy je podziwiać.Własności transcendentalne wszystkiego, co istnieje, mające swe źródło w Bogu sprawiają, że człowiek posiada wolność. Brak oczywistości bezpośredniej transcendentaliów stanowi najgłębszy powód zafałszowania wolności ludzkiej.
|
|
|
recenzje |
18.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Agnieszka Kijewska
Agnieszka Kijewska
The Metaphysics of Theism. Aquinas’s Natural Theology in „Summa contra gentiles” I
The Metaphysics of Theism. Aquinas’s Natural Theology in „Summa contra gentiles” I
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
19.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Piotr Moskal
Piotr Moskal
Człowiek wobec religii. Filozoficzne aspekty religijnego sensu
Człowiek wobec religii. Filozoficzne aspekty religijnego sensu
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
20.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
48/49 >
Issue: 2
Magdalena Lasik
Magdalena Lasik
The Ethics of Science: An Introduction
The Ethics of Science: An Introduction
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|