|
1.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
Patrick Bourgeois
Hermeneutics of Symbols and Philosophical Reflection: Paul Ricoeur
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
John McGinley
The Essential Thrust of Heidegger's Thought
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
Paul Tibbetts
John Dewey and Contemporary Phenomenology on Experience and the Subject-Object Relation
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
George J. Stack
On the Notion of Dialectics
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
Robert Vanden Burgt
William James on Man's Creativity in the Religious Universe
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
John Carmody
A Note on the God-World Relation in Whitehead's Process and Reality
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
Index of Volume 15 (1971)
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 4
Notes on some Authors
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
F. Joseph Smith
Some Notes on the Meaning of Analysis
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The following frank comments on the subject of analysis, though they obviously represent a preliminary examination af some of the problems that emerge between philosophical analysis and phenomenology as the two major trends in contemporary philosophy, are conceived by the present author in a much broader manner than the mere confrontation of two apparently opposing schools of thought. Due to the emergent nature of these themes, some adagio, others allegro, it has been impossible to arrange them in the usual systematic manner. (This difficulty was experienced in a grander manner by Wittgenstein himself, as his remarks in Philosophical Investigations plainly show.) Whatever in these comments is "offensive" to either phenomenologist or analyst derives from the fact that this is only a preliminary study, in which the author is orienting himself and preparing for more systematic and thorough-going dialogue with sympathetic analyst friends and phenomenologist critics. (More developed thoughts and satisfactory conclusions should be reached in my forthcoming review essay on H. Khatchadourian's A Study in Critical Method, now being written for The Journal of Value Inquiry.) What is presented here to friend, foe, and general philosophical reader, is a selection of themes that have puzzled me greatly. I offer them without any of the usual excuses and with the hope that to some extent this discussion may bring philosophers together, so that we can begin to lind the common ground, on which to make our contribution to contemporary thought the more truly convincing.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Notes on some Authors
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Walter Robert Goedecke
Ihde's Auditory Phenomena and Descent into the Objective
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Notes on some Authors (Part 2)
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
John J. Mood
Conversation and Interpretation
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Michel Henry
Introduction to the Thought of Marx
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Jean-Paul Sartre insists that Marxism is the only philosophy that speaks to and out of the condition of contemporary man. Each cultural period has but onephilosophy that is authentic. Today, that philosophy is Marxism. Even if one accepts Sartre's position, it is clear that Marxism today is not one monolithic ideologydeveloped by proclamation. A recent group of articles in Philosophy Today (Winter 1970), devoted to the thought of Ernst Bloch, indicated this. The two followingarticles of Michel Henry and Arthur McGovern indicate further some of the sources of diverse interpretations and positions. (Editor)
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Arthur F. McGovern
Young Marx on the Role of Ideas in History
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 3
Maurice Friedman
Touchstones of Reality
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 2
The Editor
Toward a Philosophy of Technology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 2
Hans Jonas
The Scientific and Technological Revolutions
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 2
Carl Mitcham, Robert Mackey
Jacques Ellul and the Technological Society
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 2
Donald Brinkmann
Technology as Philosophic Problem
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|