Cover of Arendt Studies
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Displaying: 1-20 of 79 documents


1. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
James Barry Editor's Introduction
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book panel exile, statelessness, and migration: playing chess with history from hannah arendt to isaiah berlin by seyla benhabib
2. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Introduction
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Lyndsey Stonebridge The Flight’s Lost Moment
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The failure of post-war institutions to fully grasp the depth and permanence of the placeless condition in the twentieth-century is at least in part responsible for the re-emergence of camps, barbed wire, sunken boats, and separated children in our own. As Seyla Benhabib demonstrates brilliantly, none of key intellectual exiles at the center of her book believed that political thought could simply accommodate the age of the refugee: the terms under which it operated had to shift with the moving world. I argue that there is an important kind of border poetics at work in these accounts of exile, migration and statelessness and within Benhabib’s analysis of the challenges that the placeless condition presents to the institutions of law and democracy today. This is no-coincidence. The modern history of placelessness required—and requires—a political imagination, and a language, that we are yet to fully appreciate or articulate. The wager of Benhabib’s book is how we might cultivate a poetics of exile which relinquishes claims to sweeping universalism whilst imagining the new forms we so urgently need to keep political life open to the differences and otherness that is its lifeblood.
4. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Martin Shuster On Ever-Growing Numbers of Human Refuse Heaps and the Scope of History
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This is a response to Seyla Benhabib’s Exile, Stateless, and Migration. I focus on Benhabib’s engagement with Arendt and her assessment of stateless persons in addition to what such a discussion suggests for the scope of our historical inquiry.
5. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
David Ingram Human Rights, Legalism, and the Parodox of Pluralism: Some Comments on Benhabib’s Exile, Statelessness and Migration
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article examines the theoretical pathways connecting Benhabib’s thoughts on ethical normativity, human rights, legality, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and the tragedy of the political. It endorses Benhabib’s dialectical treatment of these paradoxical political tropes but notes a possible unresolved tension in her discussion of the ambiguous moral and legal nature of human rights. I propose a pluralist approach to the moral grounding of legal human rights that might be at odds with Benhabib’s approach.
6. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Claire Elise Katz Revisiting the Question of Israel: A Response to Seyla Benhabib
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In her chapter on Judith Butler’s Parting Ways, Seyla Benhabib revisits not only Levinas’s statements on Israel but also Butler’s response to them. Several of Levinas’s statements on the State of Israel were made either before the state came into existence or just as it was forming. And several of Levinas’s statements about the hostility that Israel faces were made not about the Palestinian but about the threats to Israel from its neighboring Arab states. In this essay, I revisit those statements and Butler’s response, in order to place them in their proper context. My aim is to ask what we can learn by revisiting these comments when placed in their original context as opposed to thinking of them as comments about Israel in its more contemporary struggles.
7. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Arie M. Dubnov The Culture of Political Despair: Meditation on Seyla Benhabib’s Weimar Syndrome and the Pitfalls of Exile Plaudit
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Reflections on Seyla Benhabib’s a. Exile, Statelessness, and Migration: Playing Chess with History from Hannah Arendt to Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.
8. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Seyla Benhabib The Weimar Syndrome, Epistemologies of Exile, and Jewish Identities: Response to my Critics
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
articles
9. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Hannes Bajohr Arendt Corrections: Judith Shklar’s Critique of Hannah Arendt
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Judith Shklar wrote about Hannah Arendt throughout her career. However, her nuanced readings are often ignored by scholars who prefer to depict both philosophers as stark counter-images. In this paper, I offer a more complex comparison on the basis of all of Shklar’s writings about Arendt. Shklar’s critique is grounded in what she sees as the Romantic strand in Arendt’s thought, which she identifies with a metaphysical, elitist, and aestheticizing stance towards politics, a distaste for modernity, and a nostalgia for Greek antiquity. For Shklar, this position comes to the fore both in what she believes to be Arendt’s purely therapeutic notion of revolution as well as the rejection of her own Jewish identity. Nevertheless, Shklar also admired Arendt’s insights about exile and her appreciation of Kant. Through her sustained critique of Arendt, Shklar developed her own conception of a realist, rights-affirming, and anti-metaphysical liberalism.
10. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Bridget Allan Arendt and Beauvoir on the Failures of Political Judgment in Praxis
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article, I bring together Hannah Arendt’s and Simone de Beauvoir’s respective theories of political judgment to evaluate the problems that arise from their accounts of judgment in praxis. To do so, I compare Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil on Adolf Eichmann’s trial in Israel and Beauvoir’s “An Eye for an Eye” on Robert Brasillach’s trial in France. In approaching the dilemmas of judgment in theory, both share a commitment to preserving freedom by virtue of our human plurality. In practice, however, both respectively demand the death penalty for Eichmann and Brasillach. I identify three distinct failures of political judgment in praxis: from the accused, the courts, and Arendt and Beauvoir, respectively. I contend that Arendt and Beauvoir fail to appropriately judge Eichmann and Brasillach by arguing for their execution, because it constitutes a form of political violence that undermines their theoretical accounts of judgment.
11. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
James Risser The Task of Understanding in Arendt and Gadamer
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Kyu-hyun Jo Violence as an Expression of Power: A Habermasian Reconfiguration of the Arendtian Relationship Between Violence and Power
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Hannah Arendt’s conception of violence in On Violence ignores cases in which violence becomes an expression of power. Through my discussion of a government’s use of violence to control criminal violence and the Algerian Revolution, I argue that an Arendtian communicative relationship between power and violence is unrealistic; a decision to use violence can arise within a government bureaucracy or between an anti-colonial group and their supporters, but not between a colonial oppressor and the oppressed. The decision to use violence is a product of power and cannot actually expect a literal public support. Since the decision arises from the power an entity has over others and the need to maintain power, it is unrealistic for power to rule absolutely or for violence to disappear because there is absolute power. Arendt’s central claim is insufficient because it does not consider how using violence is a decision arising from power.
review essays
13. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
John Douglas Macready The Problem of Loneliness
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
14. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Manjeet Ramgotra Democracy in the Moment: The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book review
15. Arendt Studies: Volume > 5
Christopher Peys Worldly Shame: Ethos in Action
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
16. Arendt Studies: Volume > 4
James Barry Editor's Introduction
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
margaret canovan: commemoration
17. Arendt Studies: Volume > 4
James Barry Introduction
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
18. Arendt Studies: Volume > 4
Richard H. King Margaret Canovan and Hannah Arendt
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Professor Margaret Canovan wrote two studies of the work of German-Jewish émigré political theorist, Hannah Arendt (1906-75). The first, The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt, appeared in 1974, while Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought was published in 1992. Both were intended for the Anglophone world, especially the US and Great Britain, although Arendt’s reception was more favorable in America where she settled in 1941 than in the UK. An historian of political thought at Keele University, UK, Canovan was ideal to bring Arendt to a general academic audience not to aim at a highly specialized readership deeply grounded in German thought. Though Canovan emphasized the conservative dimensions of Arendt’s thought, her conclusion was, finally, that Arendt’s political thought was a form of modern “republicanism” not an argument for inherited political traditions or a plea for New Left radicalism. It was a plea for pluralism, as it were.
articles
19. Arendt Studies: Volume > 4
Verónica Zebadúa-Yáñez ‘But I am a rebel after all!’ The Politics of Marginality in Hannah Arendt’s Life of Rahel
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this essay, I offer an interpretation of Arendt’s biography of the Jewish-German salonnière, Rahel Varnhagen: The Life of a Jewess (1957). Treating the book as a work of political theory, I develop two arguments: First, I contend that Arendt’s study lays the grounds for a political epistemology of marginality and exclusion, making her a standpoint theorist avant la lettre. Second, I argue that Arendt’s book gives us an account of the process of ‘becoming political.’ This helps complement, and to a degree counter, her insistence in more widely read books that political freedom is an exclusively plural experience in the public realm. This insistence sidelines the role played by individual political consciousness in the decision to engage in action, as well as the necessary interaction between the private and the public spheres in becoming a political subject. Arendt’s biography suggests that becoming political can be facilitated by a solidary, and private encounter with the excluded other.
20. Arendt Studies: Volume > 4
Katherine Davies The Architecture of Appearance: Arendt’s Feminism and Guatemala’s Private City
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Ciudad Cayalá in Guatemala brands itself as the country’s first private city. I turn to Hannah Arendt to show how and why Cayalá does not and cannot provide the space of appearance she argues is needed to support the possibility of political action. I show how Arendt provides two apparently distinct phenomenological accounts in The Human Condition—one historically-oriented and the other politically-oriented—that articulate how Cayalá fails in its aspiration to privatize the political. Yet the apparent divergence between her accounts raises concern about her relevance for liberatory feminist projects. To demonstrate how and why Arendt’s political phenomenology is aligned with certain feminist aims, I also generate a Cayaláian reading of Arendt to demonstrate the coherence of her two phenomenological accounts through interpreting her thinking by way of Cayalá’s architecture. This article enacts a dialogue between Arendt and Cayalá, mediated by feminist and architectural theory, concerning why efforts toward the privatization of cities will fail.