Cover of Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 33 documents


journal information
1. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Editorial Board and Submissions Guide
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
2. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Paul Lewis Preface
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Notes on Contributors
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
reflections on the calling of social thought
4. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Struan Jacobs Recovering the Thought of Edward Shils
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article provides an extended review of The Calling of Social Thought, a collection of essays about the thought of social theorist Edward Shils. The article includes preliminary observations about Shils’ life and work, brief summaries of the essays included in the collection, and several suggestions aimed at encouraging additional study of Shils’ writings.
5. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Peter C. Blum Edward Shils as Stranger, Social Thought as Vocation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This essay is a response to Struan Jacobs, “Recovering the Thought of Edward Shils,” which is an extended review of Adair-Toteff and Turner’s The Calling of Social Thought. It considers Edward Shils as a “stranger,” in the sense defined by Georg Simmel, relative to contemporary sociology. Christian Smith’s claim that American sociology is implicitly pursuing a “sacred project” is invoked, in contrast with Shils’ vision for consensual sociology. The expansion by CST to “Social Thought” as a calling (vocation), and its ties to science as understood by Polanyi, are strongly affirmed.
6. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Stephen Turner The Human Face of Knowledge: A Response to Jacobs and Blum
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This is a brief response to comments by Struan Jacobs and Peter Blum on The Calling of Social Thought, Rediscovering the Work of Edward Shils, a recent collection of essays edited by Christopher Adair-Toteff and Stephen Turner. It identifies a distinctive contribution of Shils to the larger problem of the tacit.
essay
7. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Alessio Tartaro The Dilemma of the Modern Mind and the Limits of Rules: Polanyi’s Criticism of Positivism (1946-1952)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Starting in 1946, Polanyi begins to criticize a comprehensive system of ideas that he names positivism. His criticism is twofold. On the one hand, it has the narrow aim of pointing out the inconsistencies of a positivist account of science, according to which the essence of scientific objec­tivity lies in establishing rigorous mathematical relations between measured variables employing fixed rules. On the other hand, it examines the broad assumptions underlying this view, namely radical empiricism and skeptical doubt. The present paper analyzes both aspects of this criticism, stressing its crucial role in the development of Polanyi’s philosophy.
continued engagement with gábor bíró’s the economic thought of michael polanyi
8. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Eduardo Beira Michael Polanyi’s Social Theory and Economic Thought
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This review article continues the forum from Tradition and Discovery 47/1 (February 2021) on Gábor Bíró’s book, The Economic Thought of Michael Polanyi (London: Routledge, 2019; 178 pp. Hardback: 9780367245634, £120.00; eBook: 9780429283178, £22.50).
9. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 3
Gábor István Bíró Caught in the Crossfire: Michael Polanyi’s Economic Thought Between Socialism and Liberalism
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This response addresses some points raised by Eduardo Beira’s review article found in this issue of TAD and suggests new directions for future studies focusing on the economic thought of Michael Polanyi.
10. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Editorial Board and Submissions Guide
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Paul Lewis Preface
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Notes on Contributors
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Paul Lewis Preface
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
polanyian reflections on the current state of democracy in the u. s.
14. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Phil Mullins Michael Polanyi on Social Order
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
15. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Paul Lewis January 6 and Its Aftermath: Moral Inversion 21st Century Style
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
16. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Matthew D. Sandwisch The Necessity of Virtue in a Free Society
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
17. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Jon Fennell The Educational Prerequisites of Rehabilitation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
18. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Dale Cannon A Polanyian Account of What Causes Incivility in Public Discourse
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
19. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
Walter B. Gulick Polanyi’s Telic View of Truth and Contemporary Politics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?
20. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical: Volume > 47 > Issue: 2
D. M. Yeager Rebuilding Responsible Freedom
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In response to the events of January 6 and the second impeachment trial, which made clear the fragility of democracy in the USA, several scholars whose work has appeared in this journal comment on one or more of the following questions: (1) What causes, epistemic and/or social, might Polanyi see as contributing to the incivility, rancor, and division that now characterize American politics? (2) What would Polanyi say about the events of January 6, as well as the events leading up to it? (3) What remedies might Polanyi suggest for rehabilitating our experiment in democracy?