articles |
1.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Jaroslav Koreň
Mená & predikácia:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This paper is a polemic response to the essay “The Semantics of Proper Names and Identity Theory of Predication” by L. Novák (SN 1–2/2004). In the first part of the article, the so-called descriptive theories of proper names and Kripke’s challenge to these views are briefly presented. It is pointed out that Novák’s exposition rests upon certain presuppositions in the theories of meaning and mind, which are controversial and which – without further argument – can hardly cast doubt on the so-called New Theory of Reference. Furthermore, it is argued that Novák’s “minimal sense” of a proper name is too minimalistic and cannot be of service to the original idea of descripitivism. In the second part of the paper, an attempt is made to show that Novák’s extensional-intensional identity theory of predication is not based on identity, insofar as it is characterised by the axioms of the theory of identity.
|
|
|
2.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Tomáš Machula
Problémy hylemorfismu:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The article deals with the concepts of matter and form. These concepts belong to the Aristotelian theory of hylomorphism which was very influential in the Middle-Ages and in the early modern second-scholastic cosmology. At present, this theory is discussed by authors of both scholastic and analytical backgrounds. The article presents and discusses some of the recent commentaries on this topic.
|
|
|
3.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Jan Palkoska
„Corpus non est Substantia, sed modus tantum Entis“ leibniz o fenomenalitě látkového světa:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The aim of this article is to present and analyze the argumentative structures which are decisive for Leibniz’s position regarding the issue of the ontological status of material things (or bodies) and matter. I reconstruct and thoroughly analyze (i) two different argumentative strategies of Leibniz’s – viz. an “epistemic” and a “realistic” one – for his general thesis that nothing material (and a fortiori no body) has rigore metaphysico the status of a substance, as well as (ii) the corresponding suggestions of his as to how the material world is to be construed out of substances and their modes. Throughout, I lay special emphasis onpinpointing the real key elements of Leibniz’s arguments and on articulating them in such terms that would allow for their direct confrontation with other paradigmatic positions regarding the issue in Leibniz’s times.
|
|
|
4.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Tomáš Nejeschleba
Lutheránský aristotelismus – Philipp Melanchthon:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This article summarises the basic features of Melanchthon’s approach to Aristotle’s philosophy in the areas of logic, ethics and natural philosophy. Although Melanchthon builds upon the humanistic ideal of purifying classical heritage, his Aristotelianism should not be viewed as ‘pure’. His conception of natural knowledge (notitiae naturales) could be regarded as a significant non-Aristotelian element of his philosophy. The view consequently penetrates his logic, ethics as well as epistemology. Primarily, however, the reason behind his reception of Aristotle is a defence of Luther’s views: the aims of logic and rhetoric lie in theexegesis of the Bible within the context of the principle of ‘ Sola Scriptura’; he rejects the medieval concept of felicity and puts antropology into the dialectics of Law and Gospel; the aim of natural philosophy is the exposition of the existence of God’s Providence. Melanchthon’s reception of Aristotle is thus influenced by the theology of the Reformation to such an extent, that we might refer to it as Lutheran Aristotelianism.
|
|
|
translations |
5.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
M. J. Loux
Nutné a možné (dokončení):
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
6.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Franz Schupp
Odpovědí na Kanta všechno začalo Duchovně-dějinné místo teologie Karla Rahnera:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
responses |
7.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Petr Dvořák
Ke Gahérově analýze Tomášovy „druhé cesty“:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
discussions |
8.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Tomistické Pojetí Predikace (1) K příspěvku Lukáše Nováka:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
(2) Odpověď prof. Sousedíkovi:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
10.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
(3) Ke stati Petra Dvořáka:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Pavel Materna
Ontologie Vztahů (1) Poznámka k Sousedíkově kritice soudobé ontologie zztahů:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
12.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
(2) Vyjádření k Maternově poznámce:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Pavel Materna
(3) Závěrečné vyjádření:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
reviews |
14.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Peter Volek, Lukáš Novák
Na cestě ke scholastice. Klášterní škola v Le Bec – Lanfranc z Pavie a Anselm z Canterbury:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
15.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Daniel Heider
Úvod do metafyziky:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
16.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Michal Chabada
Duns Scotus, Metaphysician:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
current news |
17.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Pavel Blažek
Kulturní styky a recepční procesy v teologii 12. A 13. století Zpráva z vědecké konference:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|