Father Hugh P. O'Neill, professor of the Classics at St. Stanislaus Seminary, Florissant, gives us in this paper a few of the ways in which training in Logic can be of assistance to the grammarian. Father O'Neill's thoughts run in an original and thought-provoking vein, and we feel fortunate in being able to present his articlewhich may prove an added incentive to many.

After pointing out the great influence of this philosophical system, Mr. Morrison looser no time in going to the heart of it. He is will qualified forth is study, having spent much time in reading and discussion concerning ths great proponents of the system.

What are we? Will Durant makes one answer; H.C.Menken another, the Scientific American a third; and others none. Mr. Prendergast has agreed to furnish theSCHOOLMAN with his idea of what "Genus Scholasticus" is like. What do you think of his conclusions?

Among those subjects which have yet to receive general treatment in Scholastic texts is the present one of emotions. Mr. Wirtenberger herein presents a compilation of opinions on this subject.

Mr. Klaas is one of the best friends of the SCHOOLMAN. His contributions have always been worth while. In "The Assault on Mysticism," he undertakes to point out the fallacy in the reasoning of the "religious psychologists" who are giving so much attention to mysticism today.