Cover of The Leibniz Review
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 455 documents


1. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Dedication
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
articles
2. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Daniel Garber Donald Rutherford and Leibniz
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Donald Rutherford Why the World Is One: Leibniz on the Unity of the Actual World
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Leibniz denies that the actual world possesses the per se unity of a substance. Instead, he seems to hold, the world is limited to the mind-dependent unity of an aggregate. Against this answer, criticized by Kant in his Inaugural Dissertation, I argue that for Leibniz the unity of the actual world is not grounded simply in God’s perception of relations among created substances but in the common dependence of those substances on a unitary cause. First, the actual world is one because every created substance is continuously dependent on God for its perfection. Without being the soul of the world, God is an emanative cause through which the created world is unified. Second, every substance is a unique “concentration” of an ideal world that is God’s model for creation. Consequently, while extensionally many, created substances are versions of the same one world chosen by God for creation.
4. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero Leibniz’s Appropriation of Spinoza’s Argument against Mind-Body Causation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In a 1687 letter to Arnauld, Leibniz draws on an argument against mind-body causation that is reminiscent of one from Spinoza’s Ethics. According to this argument, mind-body causation is impossible because of the lack of proportion between thoughts and motions. This paper aims to shed light on Leibniz’s use of Spinoza’s argument by reconstructing both its internal structure and its development in Leibniz’s later works. In particular, the reconstruction focuses on the new version of this argument that Leibniz adopts against Stahl’s vitalism as well as on the change that this new version reveals in Leibniz’s attitude towards occasionalism. The possible influence of Cordemoy is also taken into consideration. The epistemological and metaphysical issues surrounding this argument are an essential part of the history of Leibniz’s psycho-physical parallelism.
texts
5. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Osvaldo Ottaviani, Richard Arthur Leibniz's Ad schedam Hamaxariam: Introduction, Text and Translation
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book reviews
6. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Aleksandra Horowska Leibniz: A Contribution to the Archaeology of Power, by S. Connelly
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Justin J. Daeley The Best of All Possible Worlds? Leibniz’s Philosophical Optimism and its Critics 1710–1755, by H. Caro
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Nabeel Hamid Leibniz and Kant, by B. Look
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Stefano Di Bella Leibniz: Wege zu seiner reifen Metaphysik, by H. Schepers
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Damian Melamedoff-Vosters Early Modern German Philosophy: 1690–1755, ed. C. Dyck
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
news, recent works, acknowledgments, abbreviations
11. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Charlotte Wahl News from the Leibniz Gesellschaft
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Paul Rateau News from the Société d’études de langue française
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 31
Recent Works, Acknowledgments, Abbreviations
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
articles
14. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Thomas Feeney Leibniz’s Early Theodicy and its Unwelcome Implications
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
To explain why God is not the author of sin, despite grounding all features of the world, the early Leibniz marginalized the divine will and defined existence as harmony. These moves support each other. It is easier to nearly eliminate the divine will from creation if existence itself is something wholly intelligible, and easier to identify existence with an internal feature of the possibles if the divine will is not responsible for creation. Both moves, however, commit Leibniz to a necessitarianism that is stronger than what prominent interpreters such as Robert Sleigh and Mogens Lærke have found in the early Leibniz, and stronger than the necessitarianism that threatens his later philosophy. I defend this reading of Leibniz and propose that some features of Leibniz’s later metaphysics, including his “striving possibles” doctrine, are an artifact of the effort to rescue the early theodicy from its unwelcome implications.
15. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Fiorenza Manzo How Sincere Was Leibniz’s Criticism of Hobbes’s Political Thought?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper focuses on Leibniz’s engagement with Thomas Hobbes’s political anthropology in the Mainz-period writings, and demonstrates that Leibniz tried to construct an alternative to the English philosopher by conceiving of a physically- and ontologically-grounded psychology of actions. I provide textual evidence of this attempt, and account for Leibniz’s rejection of Hobbes’s political theory and anthropological assumptions. In doing so, I refer to diverse aspects of Leibniz’s work, thereby highlighting his aspiration to congruity and consistency between different areas of investigation. Furthermore, Leibniz’s political writings and letters will reveal another—sometimes neglected—aspect of the issue: his concern to defend and legitimize the existence of pluralist and collective constitutional political systems like the Holy Roman Empire by providing the theoretical ground of their ability to last.
text
16. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Osvaldo Ottaviani, Alessandro Becchi Leibniz on Animal Generation: An Unpublished Text (LH 37, 7, Bl. 6-7) with Introduction, Critical Edition, Translation, and Commentary
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book reviews
17. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Julia Borcherding Leibniz’s Naturalized Philosophy of Mind, by Larry M. Jorgensen
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
18. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Markku Roinila Leibniz’s Legacy and Impact, ed. Julia Weckend and Lloyd Strickland
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
19. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Richard T. W. Arthur Leibniz: Dissertation on Combinatorial Art. Translated with introduction and commentary by Massimo Mugnai, Han van Ruler, and Martin Wilson
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
20. The Leibniz Review: Volume > 30
Adam Harmer Leibniz’s Key Philosophical Writings: A Guide, ed. Paul Lodge and Lloyd Strickland
view |  rights & permissions | cited by