Cover of Southwest Philosophy Review
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 1597 documents


commentaries
1. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Susan V. H. Castro Considering the Scope, History, and Sophistication of Skilled Action in Expertise
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In his paper “Getting Sophisticated: In Favor of Hybrid Views of Skilled Action in Expertise,” Spencer Ivy (2023) argues effectively for what he calls a “sophisticated hybrid” view of expertise, driven by empirical considerations and argument from contemporary phenomenology and cognitive architecture. Here I raise three unfair objections which I think lead to some fair questions that may be productive for discussion and future work.
2. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
John Montani Response to “Defending Heidegger’s Phenomenology Against the Charge of Correlationism”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Christopher Scott Sevier Comments on Eric Wilkinson, “Mersenne’s Principles of Song Creation”
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In his paper, “Mersenne’s Principles of Song Creation,” Eric Wilkinson (2023) lists several aims he intends to establish. I will confine my comments to two areas only: First, on the reasons given for preferring Aquinas’s theory of the passions as the major influence on Mersenne to those of either Aristotle or Cicero, and Second, on its representation of Aquinas’s theory of the passions.
4. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Luke Hillman Comments on Joshua Horn, “The Ontological Interpretation of Leibniz’s Account of Compossibility”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
5. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Christopher Martin Aristotle, Spinoza, and Burnside on Infinite Space
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Aristotle argues that the world is populated by real and distinct physical substances; Spinoza that there must and can only be one physical substance. Aristotle’s view carries considerably intuitive appeal, but Spinoza’s logic can, under the right interpretation, seem awfully convincing. Andrew Burnside (2023) helps us to explore what occurs when Aristotle’s unstoppable intuitive appeal meets Spinoza’s impeccable logic. Burnside’s project, as I understand it, has two aims: to show that Spinoza’s argument for one extended substance is a better account of physical reality than Aristotle’s arguments against an infinite body and, second, to support this claim by defending Yitzhak Melamed interpretation of Spinoza as genuinely dividing reality into substances and modes. I would like to press Burnside on the usefulness of comparing Aristotle and Spinoza with respect to an infinitely extended physical thing and then raise several question for his reading of Spinoza.
6. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Dan Larkin Comments on Taylor Baker’s “The Euthyphro Problem in Plato’s Cratylus”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Thomas Tuozzo Comments on LeGrant, “The Democritean Descent: A Reply to Della Rocca’s The Parmenidean Ascent”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Laura J. Mueller Defending Dani: Personhood and Critical Autism Studies
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
E.M. Dadlez Leveraging Respect from a Pro-Choice Perspective: A Response to Bertha Manninen
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Henry Jackman McCullagh on Explaining Substitution Failures
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Beth Seacord Comments on William Hannegan’s “Metaphysics-Laden Observation”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Klaus Ladstaetter Response to “Hope and Knowledge” by Trevor Adams
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Scott Aikin Pragmatic Infallibilism, Skeptical Perseverance, and Bar Room Knowledge: Comments on Brian Kim
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
14. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Stefan Sencerz On Self-Effacement and “Schizophrenia” of Virtue Ethics: Comments On Timothy Bloser, “Self-Effacement and Virtue Ethics”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
15. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Tailer Ransom From Rhetorical to Dialectical: Commentary on Duindam’s “On the Singularity of the Categorical Imperative”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
16. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Justin Simpson The Potential and Limitations of Aristotelian Final Causes in the Life Sciences
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
17. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Alastair Norcross Comments on “The Impossibility of Hypocritical Advice”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
18. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Robyn Gaier Commentary on “Moral Guilt without Blameworthiness” by Jaeha Woo
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
19. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Justin Bell Alain Locke, Imaginative Reconstruction, and the Condemnation of Stereotypes: A Commentary on Joshua Anderson’s “Collective Identity and Cultural Pluralism: Alain Locke on Stereotypes in Literature”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
20. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Rachael Yonek Commentary: Michael Jostedt’s “Finding a Place in Space”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by