Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Displaying: 1-15 of 15 documents


articles
1. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Thomas Sherman, S.J. Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
While Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics does not provide a guide for action in the form of rules for a decision process as deontological or consequentialistethical theories purport to do, he does present a description of the virtuous agent and the virtues that this agent exercises in his choices of action. In this paper Iargue that Aristotle’s mature virtuous agent characteristically exercises the virtue of wisdom (sophia) as well as the practical virtues of character and intelligence in his choices of action and that students of virtue (those sincerely interested in becoming virtuous by acting as the virtuous agent does) can derive certain action-guiding rules from a description of these three virtues and how they are exercised by the mature virtuous agent in any given choice of action.
2. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Howard J. Curzer Aristotle’s Mean Relative to Us
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The article argues that Aristotle takes the mean to be relative neither to character nor to social role, but simply to the agent’s situation. The “character relativity” interpretation arises from the contemporary common-sense impulse to hold people who must overcome obstacles to a lower standard than people who easily act and feel rightly. However, character relativity vitiates Aristotle’s distinction between what moral people should do and what people should do to become moral. It also clashes with Aristotle’s principle that the virtuous person is the measure of which actions and passions are virtuous. The “role relativity” interpretation arisesfrom the contemporary common-sense impulse to hold people in different social roles to different standards. However, role relativity vitiates Aristotle’s distinctionbetween the good person, on the one hand, and the good ruler, subject, doctor, soldier, and citizen, on the other. It also clashes with his claim that children, natural slaves, and women are inferior to adult, naturally free men.
3. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Andrew Cummings Hegel and Anselm on Divine Mystery
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article explores the relationship between religious and philosophical thought, taking the kindred approaches of Anselm and Hegel as illustrations of one particular approach to the issue. It is argued that both thinkers employ a “logic of unity” which tends to subordinate the religious to the philosophical. The most important result of this approach, for the purposes of this paper, is the blurring of the distinction between the human and the divine. The logic of unity, whichultimately implies the “unity” of the human and divine, renders the traditional understanding of God’s mystery problematic. Yet, while Hegel is comfortablewith this eradication of mystery, Anselm proceeds to offer a somewhat cryptic argument for divine mystery, which nevertheless respects the logic of unity towhich he adheres.
4. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Andrej Krause Are Bolzano’s Substances Simple?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article analyzes one aspect of Bolzano’s metaphysics. It discusses the question of whether, according to Bolzano, substances are simple or not. In theopinion of some commentators, he accepts composed substances, that is, substances having substances as proper parts. However, it is easily possible to misinterpret his position. This paper first tries to reconstruct Bolzano’s definitions of the concept of substance and suggests that he should be able to agree with the following final definition: x is a substance if and only if x is real and not a property. After this, it is shown that, according to Bolzano, every substance is simple in a fourfold sense: No substance has (1) adherences as parts, (2) substances as proper parts, (3) spatially extended parts, and (4) temporal parts.
5. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Paul Symington The Unconscious and Conscious Self: The Nature of Psychical Unity in Freud and Lonergan
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article compares the accounts of psychical unity in Freud and Lonergan. Following a detailed account of Freud’s understanding of psychical structure andhis deterministic psycho-biological presuppositions, Lonergan’s understanding of psychical structure in relation to patterns of experience is discussed. As opposed to Freud’s theory, which is based on an imaginative synthesis of the classical laws of natural science, Lonergan considers psychical and organic function as concretely integrated in human functionality according to probabilistic schemes of recurrence. Consequently, Lonergan offers a theory of the psychological problems of repression and inhibition not primarily as functions of subverted organic desires, but more properly according to the functioning of intellectual bias. Lonergan thereby provides a more comprehensive understanding of the unity of the human self at the psychical level.
6. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Lydia Jaeger Bas van Fraassen on Religion and Knowledge: Is There a Third Way beyond Foundationalist Illusion and Bridled Irrationality?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In his recent book, The Empirical Stance (2002), Bas van Fraassen elaborates on earlier suggestions of a religious view that has striking parallels withhis constructive empiricism. A particularly salient feature consists in the way in which he keeps a critical distance from theoretical formulations both in scienceand religion, thus preferring a mystical approach to religious experience. As an alternative, I suggest a view based on mediation by the word, both in the structureof reality and the encounter between persons. Without falling prey to rationalist illusions, such an approach allows for true human knowledge as embedded intranscendent Wisdom. It implies a more radical break with the Enlightenment ideal of neutral and universal knowledge than van Fraassen’s program, as he stillmaintains a kind of immanent grounding of knowledge in the form of direct, unmediated experience, in spite of his rejection of classical foundationalism. Wecan thus overcome the antithetical ring that characterizes his notion of rationality understood as bridled irrationality and escape relativism without forgetting thelessons that we have learned from the collapse of positivism—lessons to which van Fraassen rightly draws our attention.
review article
7. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Dennis L. Sepper After Fascism, After the War: Thresholds of Thinking in Contemporary Italian Philosophy
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article offers a detailed review of Filosofi italiani contemporanei, a book that presents overviews of seven contemporary Italian philosophers and philosopher/theologians—Luigi Pareyson, Emanuele Severino, Italo Mancini, Gianni Vattimo, Vincenzo Vitiello, Massimo Cacciari, and theologian Bruno Forte. Not intended as a comprehensive survey of the contemporary Italian philosophical scene, the book presents thinkers influential during the last three decades who have focused on tradition, post-metaphysical conceptions of being, origin, and principle, and the openness of philosophy to religion. Although eccentric by Anglo-American standards, the selection does not misrepresent recent Italian philosophizing, which has been more thoroughgoingly shaped by neo-scholasticism, idealism, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and nihilism than most English-language work. Open to international philosophy as well as to its own traditions, Italian thinkers work within a complex ethos that has produced significant recent philosophizing and holds great promise for the future.
book reviews
8. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Michael Ewbank Théologie négative et noms divins chez saint Thomas d’Aquin
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Vincent Colapietro The Grace and the Severity of the Ideal: John Dewey and the Transcendent
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Julia Schneider The Suspended Middle: Henri de Lubac and the Debate Concerning the Supernatural
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Salman Bashier An Islamic Philosophy of Virtuous Religions: Introducing Alfarabi
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Janet E. Smith The Pinckaers Reader: Renewing Thomistic Moral Theology
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Cynthia R. Nielsen Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism?
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
books received
14. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Books Received
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
contents of volume
15. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 80 > Issue: 4
Contents of Volume 80
view |  rights & permissions | cited by