Cover of Philotheos
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:

Displaying: 21-40 of 496 documents

in memoriam
21. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 2
Alfons Reckermann Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Werner Beierwaltes (8. 5. 1931 – 22. 2. 2019)
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book review
22. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 2
Bogdan Lubardić Ph. W. Rosemann, Charred Root of Meaning (2018)
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
23. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
L. Scott Smith A Christian View of “Faith” in God: a Bi-Modal Interpretation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
While central to the Christian religion, the act of faith has been notoriously difficult to define. This essay is an attempt to illuminate, with the aid of insights from cognitive science and process philosophy, what it means for a Christian to have faith, specifically in God. In doing so, the apriori and aposteriori aspects of faith are explored, along with its connections to science and empirical evidence, revelation, knowledge, doubt, morality, and additional Christian beliefs.
24. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Bogdan Lubardić Missiological Dimensions of Philosophy: St Paul, the Greek Philosophers and contact-point making (Acts 17:16-34)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This study demonstrates how and with what aim philosophy is received into the missionary activities of the apostles Paul and Luke as regards the Areopagitica in Acts 17. By an ingenious utilization of Greco-Roman learning and paideia, generally, and philosophy, particularly, Lukan Paul offers a context oriented cross-cultural model of preaching the kerygmatic word as of evangelization. A model for the inculturation of the power and meanings of the Gospel message is offered. In this a significant function is allocated to disciplined mindful reasoning, viz. philosophy. The author demonstrates the special ways in which contact-points are made, and common ground established, between the apostle Paul and Athenian philosophers. This allows him to observe that philosophy is endorsed by the primordial Church: both (a) as a dialectical (critical analytical) and rhetorical (per­suasive oratorical) science-skill of addressing significant intellectual others and (b) as a faith-friendly mode of the Christian’s practice of philosophy. The author infers a number of conclusions regarding the substantial role that philosophy acquires within the early Church. Moreover, the Christian endorsement of philosophy as a missionary tool has its grounding in the apostolic Church and, consequentially, it has its grounding in the New Testament. In this way philosophy, utilized and re-functionalized by the apostles Paul and Luke themselves, in its special way, participates in the “authoritative establishment of tradition by means of apostolic origin”. The missionary model laid-out in Acts 17:16-34 has lasting value and needs to be continuously re-actualized: the same follows suit for a faith-conducive practice of philosophy.
25. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Dionysios Skliris Ambiguities in Plotinus’ Account of the Generation of the Intellect from the One
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The paper examines the status of ambiguity in the thought of Plotinus (c. 204/205-270). Even though ambiguity should be regarded as the enemy of the philosopher and as pertaining rather to the rhetorical tradition and not the philosophical one as it was especially established by Plato and Aristotle, one can argue that the particularly Neoplatonist philosophical project permitted an important place to it due to some fundamental inherent aspects that it contained. Most importantly, the ambiguity in the generation of the Intellect from the One is examined in this paper as related to the dialectic between existence and being. In such a perspective, ambiguity is initiated by the fact that being is both one in order to exist and not one in order to be a being. Thus, it can be explained only in dialectic with an ontological reality beyond it, namely an absolute One. This means that, in turn, its generation as Intellect from the latter is necessarily a two-fold movement: Both a distribution of existence by procession and a reverting contemplative act for acquisition of substantial definition. This dialectic does not only concern the highest ontological level of the relation of the Being to the One, but is a permanent ontological vacillation in the system of Plotinus. The paper observes this valorization of ambiguity as an original and dynamic feature of Plotinian ontology that arguably paved the way for Modernity.
26. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Jeffrey Dirk Wilson A Proposed Solution of St. Thomas Aquinas’s “Third Way” Through Pros Hen Analogy
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
St. Thomas’s Third Way to prove the existence of God, “Of Possibility and Necessity” (ST 1, q.2, art. 3, response) is one of the most controverted passages in the entire Thomistic corpus. The central point of dispute is that if there were only possible beings, each at some time would cease to exist and, therefore, at some point in time nothing would exist, and because something cannot come from nothing, in such an eventuality, nothing would exist now—a reductio ad absurdum conclusion. Therefore, at least one necessary being must exist. Generations of critics and defenders have contended over St. Thomas’s proof. This article argues that the principle of pros hen analogy is implicit in the Third Way and that once identified explains the ontological dependency of possible beings, as secondary analogates, on the first necessary being, as primary analogate. Thus, without the necessary being as primary analogate, possible beings simply could not exist. The fact that they do exist is evidence for the existence of the necessary being. St. Thomas makes synthesizes the principle of pros hen analogy, as found in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, with the Neoplatonic principle of participation. Aristotle develops pros hen analogy in contradistinction to univocal and equivocal predication as well as to genus in Metaphysics 4.2, 11.3, 12.3-5. Since Scotus and re-enforced by modern analytic logic, philosophers have almost universally regarded any kind of analogical predication as a sub-category of equivocal predication and, thus, implicitly occlude the possibility of considering pros hen analogy in their readings of the Third Way. Distinction of per se and per accidens infinite regress and of radical and natural contingency are also central to understanding the Third Way. While resolving apparent problems in the Third Way, the article also seeks to rehabilitate the doctrine of pros hen analogy as a basic principle in Thomistic and, indeed, Aristotelian metaphysics.
27. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Werner Theobald Trauma und Transzendenz. Zur Existenzphilosophie Kierkegaards
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Sören Kierkegaard gilt als „Vater der Existenzphilosophie“. Durch Schwermut bzw. Melancholie „zuinnerst in die Frage nach sich selber geworfen“ (Wilhelm Weischedel), habe er das Thema der Existenz philosophisch entdeckt. Tatsächlich, dies versucht der vorliegende Artikel zu zeigen, war Kierkegaard traumatisiert. Ein Trauma ist, anders als Schwermut oder Melancholie (modern gesprochen: Depression), keine psychische Erkrankung, sondern eine „gesunde Reaktion auf eine kranke Situation“, die die Verarbeitungsmöglichkeiten des Individuums überfordert. Das Selbst wird dabei gefährdet oder gar zerstört. Der Versuch, „für sich selbst durchsichtig zu werden“ ( Joakim Garff ), auf den Kierkegaards Denken hinauslief, kann entsprechend als philosophische Traumabewältigung gelten – jedoch nicht so, dass dabei ein psychisches Problem, sondern Existenzielles verarbeitet wird. Denn: Im Trauma erfährt man die „Abgründigkeit des Seins“, es führt „direkt in die Tiefenstruktur der Existenz“ (A. Längle). Dass Kierkegaard dabei Halt in der Transzendenz gefunden hat, erweist sich als immanent konsequent.
28. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Predrag Čičovački Leo Tolstoy on the Purpose of Art
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Leo Tolstoy (1828–1910) was one of the greatest artists of all time, but also one of the harshest critics of the contemporary art. In the conclusion of his controversial book, What is Art?, Tolstoy claimed: “The purpose of art in our time consists in transferring from the realm of reason to the realm of feeling the truth that people’s well-being lies in being united among themselves and in establishing, in place of the violence that now reins, that Kingdom of God – that is, of love – which we all regard as the highest aim of human nature.” In my paper I want to examine what Tolstoy means by that, and also how his understating of the purpose of art applies to his own works of art, as well as how it applies to some other contemporary works of art.
29. Philotheos: Volume > 19 > Issue: 1
Ivana Noble, Zdenko Širka Doctrine of Deification in the Works of Cardinal Tomáš Špidlík and His Pupils
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article focuses on the work of Czech Jesuit Cardinal Tomáš Špidlík (1919-2010), continued in his pupils, both in Rome, where he taught for most of his life, and in the Czech Republic. It explores in particular how studies of hesychasm marked their understanding of deification. It asks in which sense their work can be seen as a Western attempt to rehabilitate the doctrine of deification in its experiential and theological complexity, where they contribute to the renewal of the communication between the Christian East and the Christian West, and what are the complications present in their attempt expressed against the background of uniatism.
30. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Wolfgang Speyer Zur Vorstellung der Seele. Antikes und Christliches
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
31. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Milan Kostrešević Religiose Vielfalt und soziale Dimension der Bekehrung im hellenistischen Judentum der fruhen Kaiserzeit: Philo von Alexandrien und Flavius Josephus
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
32. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Marko Vučković Reason’s Reasons: First Principles in the Second-Century Pagan Apologetic
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
33. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Marina Stojanović Origen on the Relation between the Concepts Fides and Ratio
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
34. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Vladan Tatalović Why do Contexts Matter?: The Parable of the Good Samaritan (Lk 10, 27-35) as an Example
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The presented study uses the Lukan parable of the Good Samaritan (10, 27-35) in order to present the shifts in the meaning depending on the reading contexts. After the basic structure of the original meaning is established, the pragmatic nuances of the parable are illustrated. The research subsequently throws light on the paradigmatic interpretations in both the medieval and the contemporary contexts. It concludes by exemplifying that the polyvalence of meaning is not only dependent upon the genuine literary structure of the parable, but also on the innate ability of the Christian organism (Church) to actualize certain features of the sacred text in the concrete life-settings.
35. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Nalin Ranasinghe Hobbes, Augustine, Voegelin and the Tradition
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Christianity today is deeply conflicted and torn apart by conflicts that originated in the Post-Nicene era through Augustine, but were resurrected by Luther, and fully realized in Post-Reformation times by Hobbes. While Hobbes is the evil genius posthumously presiding over the post 9/11 world, he merely exploited flaws in Christian anthropology and political theory originating in Augustine’s City of God. While freedom to Hobbes ultimately means nothing more than the mad dream of escaping from the Dionysian furies that haunt reason and bubble under the Western tradition, he artfully uses scripture, particularly the Old Testament, to justify his evil project of destroying the city, denying the soul and dealing a death blow to Jesus’ gospel. In this, Hobbes but follows in Augustine’s steps. It was the so-called Doctor of Grace who moved the West towards cynical political theology and corrupt clericalism. By his novel doctrine of original sin and belief that civic life could never be better than punishment for unrequited human depravity, Augustine justifies war, rationalizes slavery and valorizes ecclesiastical and political tyranny. Rather than trying to support communities that follow the loving spirit of the Gospel, his priority is to defend dire dogma and uphold centralizing Roman hegemony. As a result, Africa was lost to Islam and fascism would get theological support for its murderous mandates. I turn to Eric Voegelin for a less linear and non-dogmatic account of how the tradition can be understood. Voegelin’s closely argued insights into the order of reality and meaning of history may be the means by which the tradition can be saved. His philosophy of consciousness is the best response to the perennial desire to unite the Hobbesian militant state with a Manichean City of God. He protects Christianity from the constant Satanic temptation to turn the spirit of the Gospel into a literal law that condemns and kills.
36. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Walter Sparn „Luther, du! – Groser, verkannter Mann!“: Lessing vieldeutiges Interesse an Martin Luther
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
37. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Благое Пантелич Достоевский на духовном пути Сергея Н. Булгакова
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
38. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Christoph Jamme Liebe im Paramythos: Zu Rilkes Gestaltung des Orpheus-Mythos
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
39. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Marko Grubačić Visions of Heaven and Hell in Byzantine and Japanese (Buddhist) Тradition
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper deals with the issue of how the images of heaven and hell are presented in Byzantine and in Japanese Buddhist art. Given the differences and similarities between the languages of art, canons and civilizational codes, we will primarily consider form, style and thematic-motific connection – but only to the extent to which such comparisons can be considered as possible and methodologically correct: as the most attractive sign of the feeling of life, which dramatically warns, invokes, redeems or conceives the tragedy of historical experience, but also as a sign of the state of mind and consciousness of different social communities.
40. Philotheos: Volume > 18 > Issue: 2
Adolf Martin Ritter Das Christentum, der Islam und Europa in kirchengeschichtlicher Perspektive
view |  rights & permissions | cited by