Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 41-60 of 1643 documents


reviews
41. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 2
Michel Weber The Quantum of Explanation: Whitehead's Radical Empiricism
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
42. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 2
George W. Shields Nature as Sacred Ground: A Metaphysics for Religious Naturalism
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
43. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 2
John B. Cobb, Jr. God and the History of the Universe
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
44. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 2
John Maxwell Kerr God Exists but Gawd Does Not
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
45. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
Dwayne Schulz The Problem of Identity and Eternal Objects in Whitehead
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article is an exploration of the problem of identity in Whitehead. Both the Platonic and the nominalistic tendencies in Whitehead are analyzed. His theory of eternal objects is criticized and a process view of identity based on tropes is defended.
46. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
Randy Ramal On Not Seeing What Lies Open to View in Wittgenstein and Whitehead: A Response to Jerry H. Gill and Richard McDonough
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article, I discuss two recent accounts of potential philosophical links between Whitehead and Wittgenstein, one by Jerry H. Gill (Process Studies 43.1) and a response to it by Richard McDonough (Process Studies 45.2). I argue that Gill and McDonough fail to do full justice to the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and the nature of philosophy. I also argue that they miss an obvious link between Whitehead and Wittgenstein that would have made the engagement with their works more productive. Borrowing a metaphor from Wittgenstein, I argue that Gill and McDonough not only fail to see what is open to view regarding the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and philosophy, but also regarding their agreement on the transcendent nature of values as such.
47. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
George R. Lucas, Jr. On the Trail of Whitehead: Part Two: The Emergence of Whitehead’s Metaphysics, 1925–29
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This is the second installment in a series that reports on the progress of some of the more interesting discoveries emerging from ongoing work on the new and comprehensive critical edition of Whitehead being published by Edinburgh University Press. This installment deals, as the subtitle indicates, with the emergence of Whitehead’s metaphysics from 1925 until 1929. The first installment appeared in Process Studies 45.1.
48. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
Messay Kebede Being and Nothingness versus Bergson’s Striving Being
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bergson imputes the generation of false problems in philosophy to the idea of nothingness and negative concepts. Yet, all his books are fraught with oppositional thinking, such as the oppositions between space and time, quantity and quality, life and matter. Understandably, this apparent discrepancy has led a philosopher like Merleau-Ponty to speak of inconsistency, while Jankélévitch and others counter the charge of inconsistency by arguing that Bergsonism embraces operational opposition as opposed to substantial opposition. This article disagrees with both interpretations and proposes a solution based on the need to distinguish between the level of intuitive vision of the unity of nature and the level of representative analysis whose defining feature is that it operates by means of opposing concepts. The progression from representation to intuition transcends opposition and unites life and matter in the vision of a self-surpassing effort or élan.
49. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
Amene Mir Whitehead and Efficient Causation: The Physical as Conceptual Realization
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Whitehead’s understanding of efficient causation is developed in reaction against the prevailing worldview of his scientific and philosophical predecessors’ material abstraction, bodily sensationalism, subject-object bifurcation, and partial subjectivism. Whitehead believed these ideas precluded the development of any satisfactory account of causal relation and connectivity. His response is to offer a forensic account of the nature of subjective experience within which causal efficacy could be accommodated. Yet Whitehead’s position has its own problems. In response, this article argues for a primordial basis to causal connectivity and for understanding physical causation in terms of conceptual realization.
50. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
Thomas M. Dicken Trees: A Panexperiential Exploration
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article explores the ontological status of trees from a Whiteheadian panexperientialist viewpoint; it also explores how our relationship with trees affects who we are as human beings.
51. Process Studies: Volume > 46 > Issue: 1
David E. Roy Can Whitehead’s Philosophy Provide an Adequate Theoretical Foundation for Today’s Neuroscience?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article compares research in neuroscience regarding the right and left hemispheres of the brain, particularly in the work of Iain McGilchrist and Robert Ornstein, with Whitehead’s perception in the mode of causal efficacy and in the mode of presentational immediacy, respectively.
52. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
John B. Cobb, Jr. Whitehead, God, and a Contemporary Rift Among Whiteheadians
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article addresses a contemporary rift between Whiteheadians who are theists and those who defend Whitehead without God. The origins and nature of this rift are explored, as is the possibility of rapprochement between the two positions.
53. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Daniel Athearn Physics and Philosophy in Whitehead
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
An essay first published in 1917 presents key insights and ideas that shaped Whitehead’s physics and metaphysics. It also displays his apparently lifelong view that science cut off from philosophy (which for him meant, or at some point led to, metaphysics) will fall short in its vital mission of explaining facts and phenomena—a view dissenting sharply from reigning doctrines of the modem era. His largely implicit criticism of the modem assumption that science as such can do without philosophy merits clarification and evaluation.
54. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Donald Wayne Viney God Almighty and God All-Loving: A Review Article of David Ray Griffin’s God Exists But Gawd Does Not
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Griffin’s book contributes to the literature of cumulative arguments for God’s existence, revealing the deficiencies of the “God Almighty” of traditional theism (i.e., Gawd) and the strengths of a Whiteheadian process theism (i.e., God). Since the concept of omnipotence is central, it is imperative to note that there are three ideas of divine power in traditional theism, not always carefully parsed by Griffin. Evolutionary theory requires rethinking theism, but, contrary to Griffin, many of the problems posed by the theory are less for belief in Gawd than for fundamentalism. Nevertheless, an interactive dipolar deity fits most naturally with evolutionary thinking to provide a concept of God All-Loving. Griffin is at his best discussing the ground of abstract truths. He does not, however, avail himself of some of the best arguments against traditional theism found in Hartshorne’s work; there is also the question whether Griffin would accept Hartshorne’s idea of the modal coincidence of God’s existence and all possibility and how this would affect his cumulative case.
55. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Robert E. Ulanowicz Process Ecology: Philosophy Passes into Praxis
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Mechanical reductionism, which deals entirely with homogeneous variables, will constrain and enable the activities of richly heterogeneous living systems, but it cannot determine their outcomes. Such indeterminism owes to problems with dimensionality, dynamical logic, intractability, and insufficiency. The order in any living structure arises via an historical series of contingencies that were selected endogenously by stable autocatalytic processes in tandem with, and usually in opposition to, conventional external influences (natural selection). The development of living communities thereby resembles a Heraclitean dialectic between processes that build up and those that tear down. Investigating this unconventional dynamic requires metaphysical assumptions that are complementary to those that have guided science over the past three centuries. The new dynamics can be represented in terms of weighted networks of interacting processes, which facilitate the statement of testable hypotheses. Network analysis thereby implements and tests ideas that heretofore could only be addressed as verbal propositions.
56. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Lisa Landoe Hedrick The Structure of Rationality and the Ideal of Aesthetic Harmony in Whitehead's Pragmatic Philosophical Theology
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Whitehead’s metaphysics provides resources for understanding a world in value-realist terms. Central to this value realism is an aesthetic conception of rationality that sees a hope implicit in our practices—the hope that our linguistic tools are suited to the task of getting things right in our fields of inquiry. This pragmatic hope entails an understanding of individual freedom and responsibility to participate in a patient restructuring of the world toward the highest retention of value. It also enables an understanding of individual freedom as obstructive to this restructuring. One task of this article is to show that attunement in theory to the hope implicit in practice can ameliorate this obstructiveness. A subsequent task is to show that, insofar as this preliminary hope is not a metaphysical premise, but a regulative ideal seeking satisfaction, it can serve as a warrant for an implicit theology in linguistic pragmatism. In this way, I argue that we can come to see pragmatism as a method lending itself to a philosophical theology of the Whiteheadian variety. We can do this precisely insofar as rationalism is seen as predicated on an aesthetic ideal of harmony—a harmony between what is and what ought to be our matters of concern. We can come to see the structure of rationality in terms of an aestheticism corrective of analytic conceptions of meaning and truth.
57. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Brian G. Henning Moral Vegetarianism: A Whiteheadian Response to Andrew F. Smith
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article the work of a recent critic of moral vegetarianism (and veganism) is analyzed: Andrew F. Smith. Smith s work is significant for process thinkers who defend moral vegetarianism for various reasons. One of these is that he forces process thinkers to consider in more depth Whitehead’s view of plant ontology; another is that Smith adds insightfully to the conversation within process thought regarding the relationship between claims regarding animal rights and the ecoholistic concerns of environmental ethicists.
58. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Richard McDonough Wittgenstein and Whitehead Revisited
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article I criticize the treatment of the relationship between Wittgenstein and Whitehead asserted by Jerry Gill in a 2014 article in Process Studies. I argue that Wittgenstein s later philosophy is much more sympathetic to Whitehead s view than Gill thinks.
reviews
59. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Austin Roberts The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History, and Us
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
60. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Adam C. Scarfe Beyond the Bifurcation of Nature: A Common World for Animals and the Environment
view |  rights & permissions | cited by