41.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
38 >
Issue: 2
Paul Mattei
La figure de Novatien chez Pacien de Barcelone. Sources et valeur documentaire des lettres à Simpronianus sur le sujet
|
|
|
42.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
38 >
Issue: 2
Jacques Arnould
Les rationes seminales chez saint Augustin par des théologiens du XIXéme et du XXéme siecles
|
|
|
43.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
39 >
Issue: 1
Charles Munier
Problèmes Monastiques et Conciles Africains (A. 345-427)
|
|
|
44.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
39 >
Issue: 1
Jean Magne
Carmina Christo Quasi Deo
|
|
|
45.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
56 >
Issue: 2
Dimitrios Zaganas
Anastase le Sinaïte, entre citation et invention:
L’Hexaéméron et ses sources « antiques »
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This article aims to assess Anastasius of Sinai’s usage of ancient Chris-tian sources in the Hexaemeron. Close and thorough examination of his quotations from Justin Martyr, Ireneaus of Lyon, Methodius of Olympus and Eustathius of Antioch reveals that, apart from Methodius, the citations have no analogy to any of their works. On the contrary, the cited opinions appear either to have come from different authors, or to have been faked, in toto or in part, by Anastasius. The reason for such a forgery lies in Anastasius’s attempt to rehabilitate the allegorical interpretation of Gen. 1-3, without being accused of Origenism. Anastasius’s witness to the ancient exegetical tradition is proven to be deliberately misleading, and therefore should not be taken at face value.
|
|
|
46.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
François Szabó
Le rôle du Fils dans la création selon Saint Ambroise
|
|
|
47.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
François Szabó
Le Christ et les deux créations selon Saint Ambroise
|
|
|
48.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 2
François Szabó
Le Christ et le Monde selon S. Ambroise
|
|
|
49.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 2
Georges de Plinval
Anticipations de la Pensée Augustinienne dans l’Oeuvre de Platon
|
|
|
50.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 2
A. Hulsbosch
Sagesse créatrice et éducatrice:
I. Job 28
|
|
|
51.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 3
A. Hulsbosch
Sagesse créatrice et éducatrice:
II. Prov. 1-9
|
|
|
52.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 1/2
C. Blanc
Le Commentaire d’Héracléon sur Jean 4 et 8
|
|
|
53.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
15 >
Issue: 1/2
Vittorio Peri
Criteri di critica semantica dell’esegesi Origeniana
|
|
|
54.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Celestine J. Sullivan, Jr.
David Hume on the Understanding:
A study of three themes in the ‘Treatise of Human Nature’
|
|
|
55.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
A. Hulsbosch
Sagesse créatrice et éducatrice:
II. Prov. 1-9
|
|
|
56.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Pierre Courcelle
La pensée de Maître Eckhart sur les ‘Confessions’ Augustiniennes
|
|
|
57.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
3 >
Issue: 1
A. Hulsbosch
Sagesse créatrice et éducatrice:
II. Prov 1-9
|
|
|
58.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Luc Verheijen
La Règle de S. Augustin
|
|
|
59.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
57 >
Issue: 2
F. Dolbeau
Deux Sermons d’Augustin pour les fêtes de Jean-Baptiste et de Pierre et Paul (s. 293 et 299)
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Published here is a critical edition of Augustine’s Sermons 293 and 299, the first edition since the Maurists. Sermon 293 was preached in Carthage on the 24th of June 413, feast of John the Baptist, at a time when infant baptism was a controversial question. Sermon 299 was delivered on the 29th of June, in honour of Peter and Paul : its manuscript transmission and thematic likeness with Sermon 293 suggest that it was preached, according to Pierre-Marie Hombert’s hypothesis, in the same year in the same city, not five years later. Both texts, numbered among the longest of the De sanctis sermons, contradict Pelagian theses about the origin of death and the notion of human impeccability.
|
|
|
60.
|
Augustinianum:
Volume >
58 >
Issue: 1
Maria Chiara Giorda
Diakonia et économes au service de l’économie monastique en Égypte (IVᴱ -VIIIᴱ siècles)
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Despite the ideal of dispossession, absolute poverty and the total absence of links with possession and human beings which shaped the myth of the monastic desert, the monastic economy and its management were very similar to the secular economic system, in that both were organised by networks based on families.This article tackles how and where material assets were produced and administered in Egyptian monasteries between the fourth and eighth centuries (the diakonia), and who was responsible for this function (the oikonomos). The history of monasticism is materially related to the institutionalisation of the society’s cultural and material systems of production. Consequently the economy was also transformed by monastic practices: history is linked to the definition and the successful affirmation of the figure of the oikonomos, the steward in charge of everyday life in monasteries.
|
|
|