Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 1-20 of 158 documents

0.087 sec

1. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Lars Hertzberg Nature is Dead, Long Live The Environment!
2. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Rebecka Lettevall The nature of war and the culture of peace
3. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Preface
4. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Bernard Reber L ’éthique de la vie, entre écologie sociale et philosophie biologique
5. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Richard Kearney Translating across Faith Cultures: Radical Hospitality
6. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Bengt Kristensson Uggla Ricœur’s History: The Historical Horizon in Paul Ricœur’s Philosophical Project
7. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Manuel B. Dy, Jr. The Confucian Golden Rule in Times of Poverty and Affluence
8. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Luca M. Possati Le « cogito blessé » entre éthique et politique
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Quels sont les rapports entre l’éthique et la politique chez Paul Ricoeur ? Le Cogito herméneutique est-il un sujet du droit ? Chez Ricoeur, le passage de l ’éthique à la politique se révèle paradoxale. D’une part, le politique réalise la visée éthique d’une vie bonne : c ’est donc une partie de l ’éthique, un prolongement de celle-ci. De l’autre, le rapport de la politique au pouvoir bouleverse l’éthique : il existe une violence qui ne peut pas être réglée par la morale. Le rapport entre l ’éthique et le politique se configure ainsi à la fois comme une identité et une différence. Ricoeur nous propose la voie d’un kantisme post-hégélien qui trouve sur le plan de la reconnaissance mutuelle et de la logique du don la médiation nécessaire entre éthique et politique. Ainsi, le paradoxe politique assume un nouveau sens créatif.What is the relationship between ethics and politics in Paul Ricoeur ? Is the hermeneutic Cogito the subject of rights ? In Ricoeur, the passage from ethics to politics is paradoxical. On the one hand, the politics achieves the ethical aim of a good life: it is therefore a part of ethics, an extension of it. On the other hand, the relationship between politics and power destroys ethics: there is a kind of violence that cannot be settled by moral rules. The relationship between ethics and politics is configured as both identity and difference. Ricoeur o ffers us the path of a post-Hegelian Kantianism which finds the necessary mediation between ethics and politics in mutual recognition and in the logic of giving. Thus, the political paradox takes on a new creative meaning.
9. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Ethics after Fukushima!: Reflections on Institutional Decision-Making in Complex Organizational Systems
10. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Internationalizing Law and Human Contingency: On Mireille Delmas-Marty and Paul Ricœur
11. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Noriko Hashimoto Conflicts between Environmental Philosophy and Cultural Problems
12. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Robert Bernasconi Kant and the Distinction between Nature and Culture: Its Role in Recent Defenses of His Cosmopolitanism
13. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp L ’éco-éthique de Paul Ricœur
14. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Pierre-Antoine Chardel Politique des réseaux: Médias numériques et démocratie à venir
15. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
David Rasmussen Public Reason and Democratic Culture
16. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp Croissance et décroissance
17. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Paul Ricoeur on Philosophy and Theology
18. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Limited Sovereignties?
19. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Paul Ricœur Théorie de l ’action et théorie morale (résumé)
20. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter McCormick Essential Sovereignties?: Political, Ethical, and Personal
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Politics and ethics are closely linked in many ways. One such link is the central but still contentious notion of the person. Take the case of today’s European Union. Most basically, member states disagree on what and who persons are. This EU paradox may be resolved when political debates about sovereignty’s limits expand to include ethical discussions of the nature of persons. The aim of this paper is to point in the direction of an account of the person that will support proper understandings of those ethical, and not just political, values that the Preamble of any eventual European Union constitution will need to entrench tomorrow.