Displaying: 1-7 of 7 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.06 sec

1. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Břetislav Horyna Břetislav Horyna
Hegels Ausspruch „Gott ist tot“ in Hinsicht auf Kant und Fichte
Hegel’s Statement “God is dead” with Respect to Kant’s and Fichte’s Philosophies

view |  rights & permissions
2. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 57 > Issue: 2
Hans-Georg Bensch Hans-Georg Bensch
Von zwei Welten zu zwei Begriffen von Natur: Anmerkungen zur Kantischen Kritik der teleologischen Urteilskraft
FromTwo Worlds to Two Concepts of Nature

view |  rights & permissions
3. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 57 > Issue: 2
Karl-Friedrich Kiesow Karl-Friedrich Kiesow
Mythen der Heimkehr. Versuch über Dichtung und ontologische Erfahrung
Mýty návratu

view |  rights & permissions
4. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 57 > Issue: 2
Wolfgang Welsch Wolfgang Welsch
Das Rätsel der menschlichen Besonderheit
Záhada zvláštnosti člověka

view |  rights & permissions
5. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Klaus Vieweg Morální světový názor. K Hegelově kritice praktického rozumu transcendentální filosofie
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The transition from morality to the morals involves the dissolution of the antagonism of the moral, the overcoming of the antinomy of constant obligation. In his Wissenschaft der Logik, Hegel focuses on the logical defect of endless progress “mostly in its ap­plication to morality“ (RPh, § 268). Pure will and the moral law on the one hand, and nature and empiricality on the other “presuppose each other as fully independent and mutually indifferent“, and thus the opposition is postulated as an axiom, which excludes its overcoming the antagonism. The antagonism “does not dissolve in infinite progress. It is, on the contrary, depicted as unsolved and unsolvable, and thus confirmed“. The result is “the very same antagonism that stood at the beginning“ (RPh, § 269 an.). The progress ad infinitum exhibits itself as antagonism that unjustly points to itself as a solution of what contradicts itself (WdL 5, p. 166). The real overcoming of this antinomy fails; the idea of the Judgment Day solution owes the answer and is only an expression of excessive gentleness towards the world. Antinomies and collisions in moral action in the end separate, which implies the persistence in insuperable antinomy. Another topic would be a detailed exposition of Hegel’s solution proposal. In any case, Hegel sees the naturalness of speculative thought in the necessity to think the ideality of both of the opposing sides, that is, to understand them beforehand as the moment of the concept of moral action, see them as opposing in their moving unity and think them as the transition from morality to the moral action, the morals, in which the antagonism of the moral is not abstractly lost, but elevated, guarded and overcome.
6. Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy: Volume > 27 > Issue: 53
Gerd Hammer Georg Simmel, Stefan George und der Erste Weltkrieg
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Initially, the Great War was received euphorically by many writers and philosophers, including Max Weber, Martin Buber and Max Scheler along with Georg Simmel. For Simmel, the war was synonimous with a greater pace of life, a form of dealing with / overcoming the levelling of society caused by the worshipping of money (´Mammonismus`). This exaltation of the war on the part of intellectuals was not common to all – the harsh criticisms of Simmel´s enthusiasm for the war on the part of Georg Lucácz and Ernst Bloch are well-known. Regarding Stefan George, in 1901 Simmel had written: ´His art has been known since its beginning for the wish to act exclusively like an art (...) the fundamental change is complete: that on the contrary, all content is merely the means for forming values that are purely aesthetics.` Therefore, in the aesthetic of Stefan George, Simmel acknowledges the reason that George will reject the war – contrary to many members of George´s circle (George-Kreis) and has its expression in the poem ´The War`, first published in 1917. This contribution seeks to demonstrate the philosophical and aesthetical reasons for enthusiasm for the war and its rejection by Simmel and George, attitudes that are not able to be explained by the opposition to militarism/pacifism that is normally deployed to distinguish between supporters and critics of the war.
7. Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy: Volume > 23 > Issue: 46
Dirk Michael Hennrich Tragische Dispositionen der Moderne. Stimmung und Aura im Wandel des Landschaftsbegriffs
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The present text deals with the relation between the consolidation and the development of landscape-painting and the concept of landscape during the 19th century and the catabasis of a certain economy of disposition until our days. The process of the transformation and overcoming of landscape-painting reflects the decadence of an entire epoch, influencing the introduction of the dispositions into philosophy, as well the initiation of a new philosophical discipline, the Philosophy of Landscape.