Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 101-120 of 196 documents

0.054 sec

101. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Michael Krom Introduction to Must Morality be Grounded in God?
102. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
John Crosby Response to Mark C. Murphy’s “Suárez’s ‘Best Argument’ and the Dependence of Morality on God”
103. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Mark C. Murphy Suárez’s “Best Argument” and the Dependence of Morality on God
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
I want to begin by expressing misgivings about a standard way of making out a claim for the dependence of morality on God, misgivings that I do not have about a somewhat less standard way of arguing for this dependence. I will then consider a guiding maxim for how to proceed along this less standard way, a maxim that I draw from Suárez’s account of the relationship between divine activity and the activity of secondary causes. I then sketch one way of conceiving the dependence of morality on God that fits well with this Suarezian maxim.
104. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Paul Symington Response to John Rist’s “Must Morality be Grounded on God?”
105. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
John Rist Must Morality be Grounded on God?
106. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Christopher Tollefsen Morality and God
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper has three parts; in the first, I look at the question, recently dis­cussed by Mark Murphy, of the role that God plays as an explainer of moral­ity. I argue for a form of explanation that is different from Murphy’s, though I wonder whether there is disagreement here, or simply difference of empha­sis. In the second part, I ask what difference Christianity—and specifically the idea that the Kingdom of heaven is our natural ultimate end—makes to us, as practical and moral agents. I will argue that it makes both a moti­vational and a substantive difference. In the third part I will ask about the way normativity is related to God’s communication of normative matters to us, and I will do this specifically by asking what kinds of speech acts God engages in in communicating normative matters to us. The standard view is that God communicates to us in commands; however, I will suggest some other possibilities.
107. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Brian Donohue God and Aristotelian Ethics
108. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Jonathan J. Sanford Response to Christopher Tollefsen’s “Morality and God”
109. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Gregory Sadler Anselmian Moral Theory and the Question of Grounding Morality in God
110. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo The Moral Disadvantage of Unbelief: Natural Religion and Natural Sanctity in Aquinas
111. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Andrew Pfeuffer Correcting the Caricature: God and Kant
112. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Joe Milburn God and Moral Skepticism
113. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Nicholas Rescher God and the Grounding of Morality
114. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Sr. Elinor Gardner, O.P. Faith is the Light of the Soul
115. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Barbara Freres Who Needs God, IVF and the Gift of Life
116. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2
Patrick Lee Introduction to Catholic Bioethics
117. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2
William E. May How Are We To Make Good Moral Choices and Do What is Morally Good?
118. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2
Germain Grisez The Call to Holiness and Personal Vocation
119. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2
E. Christian Brugger Bioethics: Ethico-Centric Interdisciplinarity
120. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 2
Maureen L. Condic Human Embryology: Science Politics versus Science Facts