Displaying: 101-120 of 284 documents

0.179 sec

101. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Michael N. Forster A Wittgensteian Anti-Platonism
102. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Peter Kivy Mozart's Skull: Looking for Genius (in All the Wrong Places)
103. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Slavoj Žižek The Cunning of Reason: Lacan as a Reader of Hegel
104. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
lain Thomson Levinas and Heidegger on Death
105. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
David Shoemaker Responsibility Without Identity
106. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Maximilian de Gaynesford Integrity Over Time: Korsgaard and the Unity Criterion
107. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Hilary Putnam On Mathematics, Realism, and Ethics
108. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Jeremy Waldron What Are Moral Absolutes Like?
109. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
John Campbell A Straightforward Solution to Berkeley's Puzzle
110. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Duncan Pritchard On Meta-Epistemology
111. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Jason Bridges Context and Use
112. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 18 > Issue: 1
Galen Strawson "We Live Beyond Any Tale That We Happen to Enact"
113. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Robin Celikates, Tomás Guerrero-Jaramillo, Polina Whitehouse An Interview with Robin Celikates
114. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Tommy J. Curry George Floyd Jr as a Philosophical Problem: Why Disaggregated Data Should Guide How Philosophers Theorize Black Male Death
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The trial of Derek Chauvin, the man who murdered Mr. George Floyd Jr on May 25, 2020, has become a national spectacle. For many Black Americans, it is merely another rehearsal of the injustice that befalls Black men in the United States when they are targeted by police violence. Mr. Floyd was murdered in broad daylight by Chauvin, yet it is Mr. Floyd’s character and temperament that is being depicted as threatening to Chauvin and the reason for his murder. Throughout the discipline of philosophy, the murder of Black men and boys is a topic most philosophy departments avoid and the American Philosophy Association neglects. This lecture argues that philosophy must abandon the martyrdom of the Black male body as the symbolic catalyst of racial change. Philosophy must not only accept that racism is a permanent feature of American society, but that this racism is misandric in that racist violence disproportionately targets Black males for death and dehumanization at levels not seen within other groups.
115. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Tony Milligan The Tolerant Animal Advocate
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
One of the recurring problems of animal rights advocacy in recent years has been the difficulty of matching up such advocacy with the broadly liberal political environment in which it operates. Animal advocates may score high on compassion for the animal victims of injustice, but much lower when it comes to political compassion for opponents. Fairly or otherwise, those with a robust, partisan commitment to animal rights have secured a reputation for intolerance. So much so, that it may even be difficult to form a plausible picture of what tolerant animal advocacy would look like, without compromising the partisanship of advocates. This paper attempts to unify partisanship and tolerance within a picture of the tolerant animal advocate as someone whose agency is marked by at least two significant constraining features. Firstly, they will engage in negative appraisals of dietary practices, but will not ordinarily move from such appraisals to any overall judgment of the character of others. Hence, they will be in no position to hold that vegetarians or vegans are in some sense better people than meat eaters. Secondly, they will deploy charges of hypocrisy rarely and with caution.
116. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Adam Burgos A Dialectical Taxonomy of Resistance
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Working from Adorno’s notion of negative dialectics, this essay charts a dialectical course of resistance toward a horizon of universal freedom. Rather than propose relations between ideal types of resistance, it emphasizes the ineliminable historical dimensions of not only real-world resistance movements but also the philosophical and political theorizing that attempts to make sense of them. In doing so it brings out certain conceptual relations that emerge or recede as the context of resistance shifts. The first moment considers the dichotomy between reform and revolution, the second moment delves into modes of reform, and the third looks to modes of revolution. Along the way the essay discusses the work of such varied figures and organizations as Rosa Luxemburg, John Rawls, Martin Luther King, Jr., Candice Delmas, Robin Celikates, Kimberlee Brownlee, Emma Goldman, Students for a Democratic Society and the Weather Underground, and the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army. In the end, the essay is written in the service of understanding the stakes and presuppositions of resistance, in theory and practice.
117. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
William Smith The Politics of Protest Policing: Neutrality, Impartiality, and “Taking the Knee”
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The dramatic fallout from the siege of the US Capitol by supporters of Donald Trump has included extensive debate about the role of law enforcement before and during the events. The apparent lack of adequate preparation and deployment fits with disturbing trends in protest policing, reflecting pervasive discrepancies between police responses to protests by right-wing or white supremacist movements and their responses to Black Lives Matter (BLM) or left-wing movements. This article addresses the ethical and political implications of these discrepancies by making the case for impartiality rather than neutrality in protest policing. The principle of impartiality is preferred because of its comparative advantages in expressing and encouraging rights-respecting forms of protest policing. The case for impartiality is also related to calls for a broader overhaul of protest policing, including a reversal of trends that pose a serious threat to the rights of assembly and protest.
118. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
William A. Edmundson "In Such Ways as Promise Some Success"
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This year is the centenary of the birth of philosopher John Rawls (1921–2002) and the semi-centenary of his monumental A Theory of Justice (1971). This essay explores the differences between political opposition and political resistance as reflected in his work. Rawls is remembered for the careful conditions he imposed in the Vietnam-War era upon justifiable civil disobedience in “nearly just” societies. It is less well known that he came to regard the United States as a fundamentally unjust society. The nation has shown itself not merely unserious about political equality—the cornerstone of Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness—but hostile to it. The Supreme Court’s campaign finance jurisprudence sanctifies spending as speech and denies Congress the power to try to level the electoral playing field. In the Supreme Court’s Constitution, substantive political equality is of no value. The upshot is that civil disobedience, conceived as an appeal to a just constitution, is no longer possible in the United States. Political resistance may be permissible, however, within the bounds of right, “in such ways as promise some success.” This essay ekes out Rawls’s suggestive remarks about the justification of political resistance and attempts to extend them to current conditions.
119. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Michele Bocchiola, Emanuela Ceva Whistleblowing, or the Resistance to Institutional Wrongdoing from Within
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article discusses the resort to whistleblowing as a form of resistance to institutional wrongdoing that comes from within an institution. The resort to whistleblowing can take either an individual or an institutional form. As an individual act of resistance, whistleblowing has often been presented as a last resort against institutional wrongdoing whose justification draws on normative arguments for civil disobedience. The institutional form we present in this article shows a nontrivial sense in which a “normalized resort” to whistleblowing can be morally justified as an ordinary practice to resist institutional wrongdoing. Whistleblowing is thus a component of an institutional ethics of office that calls on officeholders’ responsibility to engage in practices of self-scrutiny and self-correction of institutional dysfunctions. The integration of the justification of the resort to whistleblowing within this framework emphasizes the importance of entrusting the oversight of institutional action primarily to institutional members.
120. The Harvard Review of Philosophy: Volume > 28
Bernardo Caycedo Masked Protesting: On Anonymous Civil Disobedience
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The rise of digital technologies has made possible a variety of anonymous acts of disobedience. Although the use of anonymity in political contestation is not new, online anonymous disobedience—such as that of the hacktivist collective Anonymous—urges political thinkers to reexamine the concept of civil disobedience. Important questions need to be asked about the extent to which anonymous, principled law-breaking is compatible with the definition, tradition, and justification of civil disobedience. This article argues that the understanding of civil disobedience employed by liberal thinkers, which rejects the notion that anonymous actions can be classified as civil disobedience, should be reviewed. Both the context in which actors break the law and the extreme risks they might face for doing so in illiberal and undemocratic societies need to be considered when thinking about what constitutes civil disobedience. The article takes these factors into account and offers a radical democratic account of civil disobedience according to which anonymous disobedience is indeed compatible with civil disobedience.