Narrow search

By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:

Displaying: 41-60 of 170 documents

0.106 sec

41. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Roderick Chisholm Das Problem der Sätze der ersten Person
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
I shall propose that the primary form of all references is that reference to ourselves that we normally express when we use the first-person pronoun. In the case of believing, this reference may be called 'direct attribution'. Our reference to all other things is by way of such reference to ourselves. I shall argue that; although we express ourselves in first-person sentences, the reference to ourselves that we thus express does not involve the acceptance of first-person proposition- for, I shall contend, there is no good reason to assume that there are such propositions. The primary form of believing is not a matter of accepting propositions; it is a matter of attributing properties to pneself I am the primary object of my own attributions and the properties are the content
42. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Peter-Paul König Kommunikation und Strategie: Anmerkungen zur Unterscheidung zwischen kommunikativem und strategischem Handeln bei Jürgen Habermas
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
There has always been criticism against the "Theory of Communicative Action". Some aspects of criticism were terms such as "Communicative Action" or "Strategic Action", the postulate of "two distinct types of interaction" and the thesis of the "primacy of non-strategic communication".Habermas answered his critics in a number of essays and replies. The numerous modifications and reformulations don't make orientation in this field easier, however. In this essay the criteria which Habermas uses to characterize communicative and strategic action shall be named. It then has to be discussed whether these distinctive criteria are sufficient to justify the dichotomy of two types of interaction. Finally, Habermas' argumentation in favor of the primacy of non-strategic communication shall be outlined and scrutinized under the aspect of plausibility
43. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Maria Ulkan Kommunikative und illokutionäre Akte
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Illocutionary acts are best looked upon as being communicative acts. Reasons are eiven for this thesis) which is quite contrary to what classical Speech Act Theory (SAT) holds to be true. It is proposed to define illocutionary intentions via (some very special sort of) perlocutionary intentions. This is not to deny the importance of this central SAT- aistmction, to the contrary, it is suggested that this distinction be reconcilable with the basic concepts of a theory of communicative actions.
44. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Dirk Hartmann Konstruktive Sprechakttheorie
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
It is shown that at least part of the terminology of the theory of speech acts can be methodically introduced within the constructive ortholanguage-programm. There is evidence that a methodical constraint leads the reconstruction of the basic speech-act-types from requests via statements to questions. Moreover there is evidence that requests and questions don't involve "propositional acts".
45. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Maria Ulkan Informations- und Aufforderungshandlungen
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Any classification of illocutionary acts to be well-founded has to be based on logical principles characteristic of the different types of these acts; and the relevant principles nave to be couched in terms of general action theory. This approach is specified for informatives and directives, and the essential connections between these two (most basic?) types of illocutionary acts are explicated and diagrammed - showing the primacy of informatives. Discussion of why, in talking about communicative acts, some divergence from ordinary language is to be recommended.
46. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Wilhelm Franke Konzepte linguistischer Dialogforschung
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The object of this paper is to provide an overview of several concepts of linguistic discourse research. The central question is the relationship between a Speech Act Theory (SAT) on the one hand and a Discourse Theory (DT) on the other, in the first section, Searle’s SAT is compared to Ethnomethodologv against the background of a brief explanation of linguistic discourse research in the 19th century. Following this is a review of two concepts, one which pleads for a ’pure' SAT without any reference to discourse (Motsch), and one which proposes replacing a SAT by a linguistic DT (Weigand). The article concludes with an overview of a range of concepts which attempt to mediate between a SAT and a DT.
47. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Dieter Mans Einige Anmerkungen zur Theorie der Argumentation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Most texts on argumentation theory stress the importance of formal logic for the study of arguments. This paper raises some doubts about the usefulness of logic for the study of argumentation. In fact\ the basic analogy between logical proofs ana arguments in natural language does not seem to hold. There seems to be a basic circularity in everday arguments which cannot be reconstructed by the standard logical tools. Therefore we habe to look for some non-logical forms of representation. Some hints for this new type of argument representation are given.
48. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Gerhard Preyer Semantik
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Aim of the deliberation is to identify the presuppositions for the analysis of use of language on the level of semantic interpretation. Pragmatics has no self-sufficiency semantic core-theory. The requirements of theories in semantic are discussed ana further the consens and disserts of the approaches in semantic analysis is demonstrated. Special references are the problem of analytic and synthetic (W.v.O. Quine. J.J. Katz, S. Haack, H. Pumam, D. Davidson), the debat about B. Russells analysis of denoting and the critics of P.F. Strawson ana K.S. Donnellan. The non-self-sufficiency of the semantic conceptualization on the level of pragmatics is valid even though semantic is deliminated through pragmatics.
49. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Georg Peter Kosmopolis
50. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Erwin Rogier Die Identität von Körper und Geist, Übersetzung und Nachwort von Andreas Kemmerling
51. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Franz Hundsnurscher Streit spezifische Sprechakte: Vorwerfen, Insistieren, Beschimpfen
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article tries to give a partial answer to the question how to analyse and describe verbal quarreling and squabbling by investigating three types of speech acts: reproaching, insisting and calling someone names. A distinction is being drawn between interaction in conflict and quarreling. Essential features of quarreling-specific speech acts are to be seen in their expressive ana offending quality in connection with certam situational factors. In a methodological perspective the focus is set upon the rules of emotion management in dialogical situations and on the relation of pragmatical linguistics to psychology and sociology.
52. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Dirk Weinreich Recht, Staat, Freiheit - Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, Staatstheorie und Verfassungsgeschichte
53. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Michael Kühnlein Das Ende der Geschichte
54. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Manfred Prisching Volkswirtschaftslehre und Analytische Handlnngstheorie. Zur Diagnose, Ätologie und Therapie einer Wissenschaftskrise
55. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Rainer Paslack Die Konstruktion der sozialen Realität Wissenschaft: Alltag und System
56. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Elisabeth M. Krekel Soziologische Handlungstheorie. Eine Einführung
57. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Wolfgang Kuhlmann Habermas und das Problem der Letztbegründung
58. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
59. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
60. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Klaus Günther Differenzierungen im Begriff der praktischen Vernunft Zu Jürgen Habermas' "Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik"