Displaying: 41-60 of 201 documents

0.204 sec

41. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Bernhard Waldenfels Zwischen Sagen und Zeigen: Überlegungen zu Husserls Theorie der Okkasionellen Ausdrücke
42. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Rolf Kühn Das Konstitutionsproblem des eigenen Leibes: Eine radikalphänomenologische Analyse im Anschluss an Maine de Biran
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
A phenomenological reading of Pierre Maine de Brian (1766-1824) offers a valuable understanding of one's own body in relation to the ego's apperceptive effort. As an organic mass, the body follows the double movement of this effort, manifested by an inner and an outer resistance. This movement allows the „constitution” of the world as correlative to the deployment of a force, identified with the apperception of the ego itself. This practical radicalization of the cogito can be viewed as the first outstanding achievement of phenomenology itself, even prior to its historical foundation by Husserl.
43. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Bogdan Mincă Das Modell der Herstellung: Über den Bezug Technē -- Eidos -- Logos in M. Heideggers interpretationen zu Aristoteles
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In his interpretations of Aristotle (1921-27), Heidegger argues that the ontological model of poiēsis (Herstellung, production, understood as bringing something into being by way of craftsmanship or art) played an essential part in the development of all major concepts of Greek metaphysics. The being of man and nature were understood in the light of the being of the produced things (erga), which Heidegger calls Vorhandensein (ousia). We will show here how Heidegger interprets three central words of Aristotle’s philosophy: technē (the knowledge which guides all steps of production), eidos (the aspect of the thing to be produced) and logos (the uncovering and bringing-together of all the characters which constitute the aspect).
44. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Rainer Schubert Zum Problem der Erkenntnis in Heideggers Sein und Zeit
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The author argues that in Sein und Zeit Heidegger speaks about knowledge only in negative terms (as Ent-weltlichung) and thus he is missing the possibility of a synthesis between our being-in-the-world and our knowledge of objects. Consequently, the discussion of all instruments, ready-to-hand for knowing something, does not take place. All measuring instruments represent exactly the link between the pragmatic and the theoretical level of human existence. The essay comes to the conclusion, that the lack of any positive description concerning the ontological possibility of the synthesis between existential and categorical analyssis is the reason for the gap between Heidegger’s philosophy and the world of quantifying sciences.
45. Autonomy, Responsibility, and Health Care: Year > 2009
Karl-Wilhelm Merks Autonomie als Selbstbestimmung und Fürsorge: Aufgezeigt am Beispiel der Sterbehilfe
46. Autonomy, Responsibility, and Health Care: Year > 2009
Volker Lipp Autonomie und Fürsorge. Die Perspektive des Rechts
47. Franz Brentano's Metaphysics and Psychology: Year > 2012
Thomas Binder Franz Brentanos philosophischer Nachlass - Eine historische Annäherung an einen schwierigen Fall
48. Franz Brentano's Metaphysics and Psychology: Year > 2012
Edardo Fugali Trendelenburg, Brentano und die Aristoteles-Renaissance in der deutschen Philosophie des 19. Jahrhunderts: die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Kategorien
49. Franz Brentano's Metaphysics and Psychology: Year > 2012
Klaus Hedwig “…Eine gewisse Kongenialität” Brentanos Rückgriff auf Thomas von Aquin in seiner Dissertation
50. Franz Brentano's Metaphysics and Psychology: Year > 2012
Josef Seifert Über das notwendige Dasein Gottes. Eine kritische Antwort auf Franz Brentanos Kritik des ontologischen Gottesbeweises
51. Franz Brentano's Metaphysics and Psychology: Year > 2012
Paul Janssen Die Gottesrede bei Brentano
52. Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities: Year > 2011
Tatiana Shchyttsova Der Geburtskomplex. Existential-phänomenologische Interpretation des Mythos von Ödipus
53. Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities: Year > 2011
Martin Nitsche Die Topologie des Seins im Spätwerk Merleau-Pontys
54. Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities: Year > 2011
Taťana Petřičkova Die Geste des Malers, die die Welt erlöst
55. Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities: Year > 2011
Witold Marzeda Phänomenologie als sprachliche Wissenschaft bei Merleau-Ponty
56. Translational Hermeneutics: Year > 2015
Einleitung
57. Translational Hermeneutics: Year > 2015
Vera Elisabeth Gerling Übersetzung und moderne Hermeneutik bei Valery Larbaud
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Long before the instauration of hermeneutical translation studies in the 1970s, understanding was considered a prerequisite for translation. Valery Larbaud’s (1881-1957) opus represents an outstanding example for this. It is mainly in his book Sous l’invocation de Saint Jérôme (1946), a collection of short multifaceted works, where the author argues for employing a modern approach to hermeneutical translation theory avant la lettre. For Larbaud, translation constitutes an intellectual, selfreliant work of writing, and it is also a research activity
58. Translational Hermeneutics: Year > 2015
Miriam Paola Leibbrand Der Beitrag der hermeneutischen Dolmetschforschung zur Begrundung einer Translationshermeneutik
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The doctoral thesis Verstehen verstehen: Modellierung epistemologischer und methodologischer Grundlagen für die Konferenz - dolmetschforschung ausgehend vom Simultandolmetschen in die B-Sprache (Modelling Comprehension in Interpreting Studies: Epistemological and Methodological Foundations for Research on Conference Interpreting; with an Initial Concentration on Simultaneous Interpreting into the B-Language) (Leibbrand2009a/ 2011a) is situated thematically in the discipline of Interpreting Studies (Pöchhacker 2004). After briefly outlining the issues treated in my doctoral thesis, this essay tries to show what contribution the approach called “Hermeneutical Research into Interpreting” (Hermeneutische Dolmetschforschung) can make to the new field of Translational Hermeneutics. In addition, the essay demonstrates how this approach can fecundate the discussion concerning Hermeneutics and Cognitive Science on the one hand and, on the other hand, provide insights into the question concerning whether or not Hermeneutics and Empirical Research are conflicting paradigms. For Hermeneutische Dolmetschforschung, Translational Hermeneutics should not restrict its research to understanding in translation per se; rather it must go beyond this and also explore how understanding itself can serve as a research method and as the foundation for an epistemological attitude. The power and productivity of Hermeneutics for building a paradigm in Translation Studies is not limited to observing and explaining the processes and products of translation. Neither is it limited to contributing to the discussion of methods adopted by the translator/interpreter in translating or interpreting. The question of method includes the questioning individual who is actively and hermeneutically reflecting on his/her own research activities. The new methodology resulting from my investigations is called Verstehende Forschung and it is grounded on the epistemological attitude of Epistemologische Off enheit. Th is methodological approach is qualitative, notquantitative. Hermeneutical Research into Interpreting defines the process of understanding while interpreting (comprehension) as Produktionsorientiertes dynamisches Verstehen. However, the core of this new approach is built by the methodological dimension of Hermeneutics. Therefore, a contribution geared towards solving the LAP-versus-ESP-controversy in Translation Studies lies at the very heart of Hermeneutical Research into Interpreting.
59. Translational Hermeneutics: Year > 2015
Radegundis Stolze Faktoren einer hermeneutischen Übersetzungskompetenz
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Hermeneutical translation is based on the conviction that one first has to understand a text before being able to present the message once again in another language. The objective is precision in the sense of an authentic presentation of that message in the translation. Th is task requests a dynamical translation competence that interlinks knowledge-based, refl exive and strategic elements. Th e article off ers a systematic description of the factors involved in such a competence. Specifically, it addresses the necessary cultural and technical knowledge, hermeneutical fields of orientation as to how to comprehend texts and formulate their translation, and the issue of the translator’s intellectual growth brought about by lifelong learning and the inter-relation between various translation assignments. Hermeneutical translation competence, which can be presented in a systemic model,proves to be an informed, self-critical, dynamic and fl exibly networking approach to texts and their worlds.
60. Translational Hermeneutics: Year > 2015
Rainer Kohlmayer Die Stimme im Text als tertium comparationis beim Literaturubersetzen
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
By neglecting to integrate the final step of rhetorics into theory, i. e. pronuntiatio and actio, modern text linguistics passed a theoretical deficit on to modern translation studies. Literary texts must be read aloud in order to realize the acoustic potential programmed into the text by the author. The rhetorical tradition of writing and reading aloud was marginalized in the course of the 18th century when reading became a private and silent affair. Herder’s (and others’) foregrounding of the ‘tone’ or the ‘voice’ in literary texts and their translations is a theoretical attempt to return to the holistic view of text production, integrating performance into the process of literary production and reception. In practice, however, great literary translators always paid attention to the ‘voice in the text’. The tradition of orality – distinguishing precise voices in literary texts – seems to come to an end in Jelinek’s anti-individualistic texts.