Search narrowed by:



Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 61-74 of 74 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.175 sec

61. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 47 > Issue: 1
Igor Dzhokhadze И.Д. Джохадзе
Back to princeton: rereading rorty
Рорти в Принстоне: повторение пройденного

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The fifth volume of Richard Rorty's "Philosophical papers" published by Cambridge University Press, consists of the works which American philosopher wrote at the very dawn of his career in 1960s and early 1970s. In these essays Rorty addresses issues of transcendental argumentation, the internalism/externalism controversy, mind-body dualism and psychophysical monism, semantic truth, reference and justification. Supplemented by Daniel Dennett's Foreword, the book gives an excellent idea of Rorty's «analytical» writings and his evolution from eliminative materialism to pragmatism.
62. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 48 > Issue: 2
Petr Kusliy П.С. Куслий
Free Indirect Discourse and its Semantics
Свободная косвенная речь и ее семантика

63. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 48 > Issue: 2
Ilya Kasavin И.Т. Касавин
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder
История науки a la belle lettre: опыт Лауры Снайдер

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Two books of American philosopher and science historian Laura Snyder are dedicated to the study of personality and teachings of William Whewell — an outstanding British philosopher and scholar, one of the father figures of the 19th century positivism. The author shows the role of communicative structures formed around prominent philosophers and scientists of the Victorian era, among which Whewell held a special and often the leading position. The purpose of these discussions and conversations, this selected discursive space or a trade zone served not only to find the final scientific truth. Much more they led to legitimating and consolidating the place of scientific and philosophical dispute in the structure of scientific activity and to justifying the latter. In this perspective, Snyder gives the chronicle of scientific-technical revolution of the 19th century, which brought England to the top of the leading world powers.
64. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 48 > Issue: 2
В.И. Аршинов В.И. Аршинов
The Problem of Reality as a "Hard Problem" of Philosophy of Science
Проблема реальности как «трудная проблема» философии науки

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The review discusses philosophical and interdisciplinary issues of the problem of reality in modern natural sciences as they are represented in the book. It is noted that the authors of the book managed to make some progress in the understanding of this «hard problem» in its philosophical and interdisciplinary contexts.
65. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 49 > Issue: 3
Andrei Makarov, Alexander Shestakov А.Б. Макаров
On the Incomprehensible Effectiveness of Mathematics. Searching for the Mathematical Object
О «непостижимой эффективности» математики, или В поисках математического объекта

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Review represents a new edition of the Moscow seminar on philosophy of mathematics works. The book deals with two interrelated problems: the problem of “the incomprehensible effectiveness" of mathematics and the problem of the ontological status of mathematical objects. The conditions of applicability of mathematical theories in the natural, social and human sciences. Ideas and themes proposed by the authors of articles have goal to reveal perspective analysis of the subject, which allows detect its previously implicit sides. This approach makes possible to put different questions related to the foundations of mathematics and provide an additional impetus to research in this area.
66. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 49 > Issue: 3
Tatiana Sokolova Т.Д. Соколова
A priori and the Philosophy of Science: A New Look on the Old Theories
A priori и философия науки: новый взгляд на старые теории

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The new book by Professor David J. Stump explores and develops the theories of the a priori, which are rarely considered in contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science: the theories of pragmatic and functional a priori, proposed in the early XX century by Clarence Irving Lewis and Arthur Pap. The author begins with the analysis of «constitutive elements of science» and Henri Poincare's conventionalism. He consistently and historically examines the approaches towards the theories of the a priori within the philosophy of science in the XX-XXI centuries, and also develops his own original approach to a priori based on the philosophy of science.
67. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 54 > Issue: 4
Natalia N. Pogozhina Н.Н. Погожина
Social philosophy of science project as a possibility for overcoming the crisis
Проект социальной философии науки как возможность преодоления кризиса

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article represents the review of the collective monograph “Social Philosophy of Science. Russian Prospects” (ed. by I. T. Kasavin). The article deals with the crisis in philosophy of science by the end of the XX century which has become prerequisite for the emergence of the project of social philosophy of science. The author analyzes this project and proves the necessity of its implementation in connection with the realities of the global world. The author also analyzes the structure of the book and discusses a number of key issues (attitude of knowledge and sociality, role of science in society, methodological aspects of case-study, etc.).
68. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 54 > Issue: 4
Elena A. Mamchur Е.А. Мамчур
What does it mean ‘to know’?
Что значит «знать»?

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This is a review of the book “Poiski ponimaniya. Izbrannye trudy po istorii i filosofii nauki” by N. F. Ovchinnikov. The author argues that the main topic of the reviewed book is the problem of knowledge. She pays special attention to the idea of invariance in its connection with the phenomena of scientific revolutions. The author also discusses the relationships between fundamental science and science as social technology.
69. Sign Systems Studies: Volume > 34 > Issue: 1
João Queiroz, Floyd Merrell Семиозис и прагматизм: к динамическому понятию значения. Резюме
70. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1
Natalya N. Pogozhina Наталья Николаевна Погожина
N. Luhmann’s Theory of Systems in the Application to the Analysis of Scientific Communication
Системная теория Н. Лумана в приложении к анализу научной коммуникации

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article represents the review of the Russian translation of N. Lumann’s work which was published under the title «Truth, knowledge, science as a system». In article N. Lumann’s approach to consideration of science as one of the communicative systems of society performing function on development of knowledge is reconstructed. Within this approach we consider in a separate way the the truthconditional perspective which is expressed by means of terms of language of the theory symbolically the generalized of media of communications. Special attention is paid to the potential of the reconstructed theory in the analysis of modern scientific community and to the relation of scientific system to other communicative systems (its differentiation from them and the possibility of interaction).
71. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1
Alexander M. Dorozhkin, Svetlana V. Shibarshina Александр Михайлович Дорожкин
Transformations in Epistemology: Problems and Prospects
Трансформация эпистемологии: проблемы и перспективы

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper is a reflection on number of statements and ideas presented in the monograph by Academician Vladislav A. Lektorsky “Humanity and Culture. Selected Papers”. The authors suggest their interpretations on his ideas regarding the characteristics of classical and non-classical epistemology, as well as the further development of epistemology in the light of its enrichment with the humanitarian and “citizen” component.
72. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 55 > Issue: 2
Igor G. Gasparov Игорь Гарибович Гаспаров
Panpsychism in the search of a self-definition
Панпсихизм в поисках самоопределения

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This is a review of the book by Brüntrup & Jaskolla (eds.) “Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives” (Oxford University Press, 2017). The author provides a detailed overview and critical analysis of a recent volume which is dedicated to different aspects of contemporary panpsychism. Among its authors are prominent experts in analytic philosophy of mind such as David Chalmers, Galen Strawson, Gregg Rosenberg. A distinguished feature of this volume is that it presents not only well-known positions in philosophy of mind such as physicalism or dualism, but also such exotic for the contemporary debate stances as idealism or cosmopsychism.
73. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 55 > Issue: 2
Tatiana G. Leshkevich Татьяна Геннадьевна Лешкевич
"Consciousness creates reality": Is there a way out of the verbal labyrinth?
«Сознание, творящее реальность»

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article provides an analysis of the book by E. V. Zolotukhina-Abolina, substantiating the dominance of the constitutive potential of consciousness. Firstly, it is the selectivity of attention involved in shaping reality. Secondly, the focus is shifted to human reality, conjugating authenticity and fiction found in self-descriptions, describing motivations of the other, “vision of the past”. Thirdly, difficulties of understanding the consciousness as subjective reality are discussed. Fourth, the problems of the philosophical language, the differences between academic and non-academic discourses come into view. The idea of “selectivity of attention” as the source of shaping reality is discussed with reference to works by D. Kaneman, U. Naisser, I. Hoffman, J. Kelly, V. Nalimov, S. Grof and also K. Uilber and H. Ferrer. While considering the nature of consciousness, the natural-scientific and humanitarian paradigms are complemented by esoteric.
74. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science: Volume > 56 > Issue: 2
Alina O. Kostina Алина Олеговна Костина
Normativity, Expertise and Epistemological Paternalism in the Philosophy of Science: A Review of the Journal “Metaphilosophy”
Нормативность, экспертиза и эпистемологический патернализм в философии науки

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
For almost 50 years the journal Metaphilosophy has been publishing research on a wide range of philosophical issues from the fundamental questions of ontology, epistemology and the philosophy of science to applied studies on ethics, technology and STS. The following review focuses on a number of key questions that have become the stumbling block for investigations in epistemology, philosophy and methodology of science and STS. The spotlight here is on the issues of reestablishment of normativity in philosophy of science, related to the PSP turn; new perspectives on the “armchair philosophy” and the ex cathedra principle; the misuse of scientific data by the philosophers of science; experimental philosophy and the “undermined” authority of philosophical expertise; and also we’ll find out how epistemic paternalism may become a virtue of research practice.