Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 61-76 of 76 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.332 sec

61. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1982 > Issue: 5
Pierre Masson The Way of Thomism
62. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2017 > Issue: 53
Wim De Reu 魏家豪
On Goblet Words: Coexistence and Writing in the Zhuangzi
論巵言─《莊子》之共存與寫作

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article attempts to reframe the state of research on the notion of goblet words (zhiyan) in the Zhuangzi. Recent studies predominantly view the notion of zhiyan as referring to peculiar stylistic forms exhibited in the Zhuangzi—forms such as dilemmatic questions and paradoxes. In this article, I question the quick identification of these forms as zhiyan. I argue that zhiyan are essentially definite yet provisional simple-form utterances located on the level of everyday interaction and coexistence. On this level, the peculiar stylistic forms do not play their part. However, such stylistic forms do become indispensable in discussing and recommending zhiyan. It is on this meta-level—for the Zhuangzi, the level of writing—that we find these forms employed. Based on structural similarities, we may stretch the label ‘zhiyan’ to include such forms but should keep in mind that any such extension is secondary to the use of language in coexisting with others.
63. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2017 > Issue: 53
Hsiu-Lin Ku 古秀鈴
On the Very Idea of a Minimal Proposition
論極小命題

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Can the idea of a minimal proposition be successfully held? I will first formulate what the minimal proposition is in the minimalist’s mind, taking Emma Borg as the representative. What a minimalist seeks for a minimal proposition is the abstract and skeletal core meaning of a sentence, and this faith is founded on the notion of minimal word meaning—an atomic, code-like, conceptual thing. I show that the problem of this notion of minimal proposition lies in the three features, intuitive read-off, invariantness, and truth-evaluability, that Borg ascribes to it. I shall argue, first, that positing a conceptual-like thing as the invariant minimal content of word cannot support the invariantness of the minimal proposition of a sentence, and second, that the skeletal content, as the minimal proposition of a sentence, is a grammatically analyzed product and thus is hardly truth evaluable. According to the analyses, the idea of a minimal proposition with these three features identified by minimalists cannot be maintained.
64. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1983 > Issue: 6
Chang Ko-chuan 張柯圳
The Problem of Unity in the Philosophy of Plato
從性質團結問題觀點分析 柏拉圖哲學(中女提要)

view |  rights & permissions
65. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1983 > Issue: 6
Denis Hsin-An Tsai God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley
66. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1984 > Issue: 7
Paul Yun-ming Jiang 美允明
The Concept of Mind in Chu Hsi's Ethics
朱子倫理學中的心性概念

view |  rights & permissions
67. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1984 > Issue: 7
Roger T. Ames 安樂哲
On The Contingency of Confucius' Emergent Tao
孔子思想中「時中J 之道

view |  rights & permissions
68. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1984 > Issue: 7
Rahner and Ricoeur 傅佩崇
An Understanding of Original Sin - Through the Interpretations of Tennant, Rahner, and Ricoeur
論「原罪J 概念之理解 一一一亨利汗泰他特、拉內、與宇榕的設釋

view |  rights & permissions
69. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1985 > Issue: 8
Fu-Tseng Liu Fu-Tseng Liu
The Functions of 'Yes' and 'No' in Chinese and English
中丈和英丈'是' (Yes) 和電 '不' (No)

view |  rights & permissions
70. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1985 > Issue: 8
Fu Pei-Jung 傅佩崇
The Justification of William James's “Religious Experience"
論詹拇士「宗教經驗」概念之證成

view |  rights & permissions
71. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 1986 > Issue: 9
Fu-Tseng Liu 劉福增
Pegasus, Monkey King and Existential Sentences in Chinese
飛馬、孫|吾空與中文存在語句

view |  rights & permissions
72. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2019 > Issue: 57
Wim De Reu, C. Lynne Hong 魏家豪
What is the Wheelwright Bian Story About?
輪扁故事旨趣何在?

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
《莊子•天道》中輪扁斲輪故事,看似旨在說明技藝之不可言傳性;若 連結到其他論及技藝與語言之《莊子》篇章來看,如此詮釋誠然有跡可循,而在現代學界也確實傾向以此脈絡來理解或應用輪扁之故事。鑒於《莊子• 天道》中,另有其他段落以「書」為題,本文擬從《莊子•天道》整章的脈 絡來探討輪扁故事之旨趣。本文將根據輪扁故事中有關書的問題,分別探 究:書的功能何在?為何批判書?書中少了什麼?依據《莊子•天道》提供 之線索探討上述諸問題時,可以發現輪扁之故事應視為政治論述之一環;換 言之,技藝與語言等議題,或許無關於其宏旨。
73. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2019 > Issue: 58
Foong-Ee Pong 馮鳳儀
The Affordance of the Graceful Fish Metaphor: An Interdisciplinary Approach Exploring the Practical Dimension of the Zhuangzi
從「承給意義」論遊魚之喻

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article explains Zhuangzi’s philosophy by analyzing the metaphor of the graceful fish. I argue that to discover the essence of the graceful fish metaphor, we have to look into the relationship between the fish and the water in which it dwells. The article consists of five sections. First, I start by a brief review of common readings of the metaphors of the water and the fish and their insufficiency to relate to the idea of Dao/daos in the Zhuangzi. Second, I propose an interdisciplinary approach based on the notion of “affordance”─a substitute for “value/meaning”─that enables us to unveil the underlying key element pertaining to the image of the graceful fish: the ground. Third, an analysis of the graceful fish metaphor is presented after the explanation of affordance. Forth, I draw on the concept of vulnerability to explain the natural ability we are born with but buried due to a dominant completed heart-mind. I explain how vulnerability steers our way by comparing two images found in the Zhuangzi: infants vs. Hundun. Fifth, I sum up my findings and conclude that the Zhuangzi provides pragmatic advices for individuals─especially those who now live in a modern society that embrace social plurality─to live their lives to the fullest within any given social context by constantly adapting to the situation and therefore creatively exploring the limitless possibilities in the social world.
74. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2019 > Issue: 58
Kok Yong Lee 李國揚
Knowledge and Pragmatic Factors
知識與實用因素

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The stakes-shifting cases suggest that pragmatic factors such as stakes play an important role in determining our intuitive judgments of whether or not S knows that p. This seems to be in conflict with intellectualism, according to which pragmatic factors in general should not be taken into account, when considering whether or not S knows that p. This paper develops a theory of judgments of knowledge status that reconciles intellectualism with our intuitive judgments regarding the stakes-shifting cases. I argue that pragmatic factors affect only our epistemic perspectives, i.e., the ways in which we evaluate S’s epistemic position. Therefore, pragmatic factors only have an indirect impact on our judgments of knowledge status.
75. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2021 > Issue: 61
Jerry J. Yang 楊景德
A Response to Rosenthal’s Arguments against the Intrinsic View of Consciousness
對羅森陶反意識本有主義論證之回應

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Rosenthal argues that if consciousness is seen as intrinsic, it will appear to be simple and unanalyzable, and therefore not amenable to scientific explanation, which requires a relational structure involving an extrinsic property of the mind. I shall first criticize Rosenthal's argument against intrinsicalism by way of conceptual analysis. I shall then examine three of his arguments against the intrinsic view of consciousness: the argument from the distinction between transitive and intransitive consciousness, the argument from reporting and expressing, and the argument of the individuation of mental states. I suggest that the content of a mental state can be considered to be an information space, which will allow for an explanation of consciousness. My rejection of Rosenthal's position relies on distinguishing two different forms of intrinsicalism: with and without self-representation. We shall find that both versions have explanatory traction from a naturalistic perspective.
76. NTU Philosophical Review: Year > 2021 > Issue: 61
Tsung-Hsing Ho 何宗興
How to Locate Pain in Mandarin: Reply to Liu and Klein
如何在中文裡定位疼痛

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Some philosophers argue that pain is an object located in bodily parts because the locative form of pain report is permissible in English. To examine this argument, Liu and Klein recently argue that the linguistic argument cannot work because the locative form is impermissible in Mandarin. They are wrong, however. I demonstrate that the locative form in Mandarin is not only permissible but also common.