Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 61-80 of 170 documents

0.1 sec

61. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák Problém abstraktních pojmů: Odpověď Davidu Peroutkovi
62. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen.: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
63. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1
Peter Hoenen SJ Descartův Mechanicismus: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
64. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1
Rastislav Nemec The Eternity of God. Comparative Study of Bernard Lonergan SJ and Richard Swinburne.: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
65. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík Člověk a stát: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
66. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák Metafyzika jako věda. Ibn Síná a Ibn Rušd ve scholastické diskusi.: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
67. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Michal Chabada 700-lecie śmierci bł. Jana Dunsa Szkota. Międzynarodowe sympozjum jubileuszowe: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
68. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky.: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
69. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík, Karel Šprunk G. Frege: Dialog s Pünjerem Český překlad s kritickým výkladem
70. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Jan Palkoska Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The aim of the article is to critically assess the widespread surmise according to which Descartes was in certain important aspects of his thought infl uenced by Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations. In the article this question is addressed with regard to the problem of the ontological background of the representational acts of a finite mind. Descartes’ position is reconstructed on the basis of an analysis of Meditation III and consequently of Descartes’ polemic with Johan de Kater in the First Objections and Replies; the reconstruction is accomplished by means of terms and concepts commonly used in the late scholastic thought of the end of the 16th century. An analysis of the key passage of Section 2 of Disputation 54 of the Metaphysical Disputations of Suárez (concerned with the distinction between extrinsic denominations and beings of reason) then shows, first, that Suárez’s position concerning the ontology of mental representation does indeed agree with that of Descartes, not Kater; second, that the implications of Suárez’s critique of certain theses concerning the identity of extrinsic denominations and beings of reason probably form an important part of the conceptual framework presupposed in the polemic between Decartes and Kater.
71. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Michal Chabada Náčrt Whiteheadovej procesuálnej filozofie: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
72. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Marián Kuna Etika cnosti podľa Tomáša Akvinského: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
73. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Ad multos annos: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
74. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
75. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Peter Volek Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus: Solving Puzzles about Material Objects: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
76. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Karel Šprunk Das Wagnis, ein Mensch zu sein Studien zur neuzeitlichen Philosophie: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
77. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 8 > Issue: 1
Jakub Jinek Přátelství, dobro, polis. K významu přátelství v celku Aristotelovy praktické filosofie: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Aristotle’s subtle distinction between the forms of friendship and his concept of loving friend as one’s other self propose a solution to the fundamental objection to any eudaimonian theory of slavery, namely that friendship – as basically non-moral phenomenon – is but an egoistic device of one’s happy life. Aristotelian theorems are based on his concept of analogy and on a philosophically specific notion of “self”. Since both of these are rooted in Platonism, Aristotle has toevolve them dialectically in a critical distance to Plato. Still, his dialectical theory of friendship needs to be rooted not in metaphysics but in political theory after all. Political friendship as a utopian perspective taken by each of the citizens in their pursuit of a close relationship with any other indicates a notion of “infinity as perfection” which presents the decisive step beyond Plato and toward the later course of the history of philosophy.
78. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 8 > Issue: 1
Andrea Blaščíková Úvod do etiky ctnosti: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
79. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 8 > Issue: 1
Daniel Heider K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky „Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu“: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
80. Studia Neoaristotelica: Volume > 8 > Issue: 1
Ondřej Kočnar Bůh jako vysvětlení: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism