Narrow search

By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:

Displaying: 61-80 of 103 documents

0.519 sec

61. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1/2
Gabriel Liiceanu, Thomas Kleininger Heideggers Rezeption in Rumänien (1931-1987)
62. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Walter Biemel Zur Gründung des Kölner Husserl-Archivs. Die Bedeutung eines Traumes
63. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Marion Heinz Philosophie und Weltanschauung: Die Formierung von Heideggers Philosophiebegriff in Auseinandersetzung mit der badischen Schule des Neukantianismus
64. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Michael Staudigl Die Grenzen der Zeit. Bemerkungen zum Status der Materialität in der Phänomenologie Husserls
65. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Mădălina Diaconu Ein Versuch über den Geruch. Überlegungen zur Durchführbarkeit einer phänomenologischen Ästhetik der Olfaktorik
66. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann Gottsuche Und Selbstauslegung. Das X. Buch der Confessiones des Heiligen Augustinus im Horizont von Heideggers Hermeneutischer Phänomenologie des faktischen Lebens
67. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Theodore Kisiel Heideggers Dankesschuld an Emil Lask: Sein Weg vom Neufichteanismus zu einer Hermeneutik der Faktizität
68. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Alfred Denker Martin Heidegger: Zwischen Herkunft und Zukunft: Die Anfänge seines Denkweges
69. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Otto Pöggeler, Kathrin Busch, Christoph Jamme, Gabriel Cercel Auszug aus dem unveröffentlichten Briefwechsel zwischen Martin Heidegger und Otto Pöggeler / Extras din corespondenta inedita dintre Martin Heidegger si Otto Pöggeler
70. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 12
Vittorio De Palma Die Phänomenologie als radikaler Empirismus
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper tries to show that Husserl’s phenomenology can be considered as a form of radical empiricism in the sense of James, since it holds—like traditionalempiricism—that sensuous experience is the foundation and the source of justifi cation of knowledge, but—in contrast with traditional empiricism—it holds that there are relations, which are given in the sensuous experience just as well contents. Reality is sensuous and the structure of reality is equally sensuous. By an analysis of the concepts of the sensuous relation, of the material a priori, and of association, it is showed that Husserl—in contrast with transcendentalism—confers a normative role to the peculiarity of sensuous contents, which determines their objective connections and also the structure of the world before the intellectual activities of the subject. At the same time, it is pointed out that Husserl has never entirely gotten over the Cartesian psychologism of Brentano and of traditional empiricism, that leads him to consider only the immanent as properly present. Finally, the paper discusses Husserl’s concept of the life-world, which originates from Avenarius’ idea of the natural concept of the world, and his position regarding the relation between experience and science.
71. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 12
Mónica E. Alarcón Dávila Kinästhetisches Bewusstsein und sinnliche Refl exion im Tanz
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Is the relationship of self-moving (kinaesthesis) to itself a direct pre-reflective self-awareness, or is it mediated through an Other? This article attempts to address this question, taking the phenomenon of dance as a point of departure, since in dance, movement steps out of its everyday background function to become the principal theme. Rudolf zur Lippe extracts from a dance step of the dances of the Quattrocento, the posa, a concept of sensual reflection. Rather than a conceptual reflection, the posa can be understood as an awareness of one’s own movement. In this article, in a dialogue between critical philosophy, dance science, and phenomenology, terms of a possible sensual reflection in dance will be discussed.
72. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 12
Diego D’Angelo Die Schwelle des Lebe-Wesens: Überlegungen zur Leibinterpretation Heideggers in der Nietzsche-Abhandlung
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
One of Heidegger’s most important descriptions of bodily existence can be found in his Nietzsche lectures. This paper aims to elucidate this “metaphysics of the body” both in relation to Heidegger’s Leibniz-interpretation in the later Marburg lectures as well as in the context of his later thought. Leibniz and Nietzsche are Heidegger’s points of departure in the attempt to think the difference between θεωρία and πραξις beyond Being and Time: It is only by understanding their relationship, through a radical re-thinking of the problem of corporeality, no longer as a noun (der Leib) but as a verb (leiben), that one can possibly move beyond every traditional dualism, between theory and praxis but also and most notably between being and becoming.
73. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 13
Guillaume Fagniez Hermeneutik im Ubergang von Dilthey zu Heidegger
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Despite the usual genealogies of hermeneutics, Heidegger’s appropriation of Dilthey’s philosophy only deals marginally with hermeneutics. Nevertheless, this paper aims to shed light on elements in favour of an implicit continuity in hermeneutics from Dilthey to Heidegger. Against the general background of the conception of life as self-interpretation, which allows the ontological radicalisation of Dilthey’s hermeneutical concepts, some diltheyan historical and aesthetical paradigms prove to be at work in Heidegger’s first phenomenology of life. “Destruction” itself, the very core of Heidegger’s concept of hermeneutics, can be partially traced back to diltheyan sources.
74. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 13
Burkhard Liebsch Zeigen, Sagen und Verstehen. Paul Ricoeurs hermeneutische Wege durch die Phanomenologie − von der Aufmerk samkeit zur Sensibilitat fur den Anderen
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay retraces Paul Ricœur’s references to phenomenological thinking − from his early work on the phenomenology of attention and volition via his methodological considerations of the relation between phenomenology and hermeneutics to his late discussion with Levinas. The paper then focuses onRicœur’s and Levinas’ debate about the limits of the phenomenological notion of the “given” and “givenness” as such with respect to the “phenomenon” ofhuman sensibility vis-a-vis the otherness of the other.
75. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 13
Rolf Kühn Paul Ricoeurs religionsphilosophisches Denken zwischen Schrift(en) und absolutem Voraus
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Ricoeur developed a very elaborated philosophy of religion. At the same time, he always moved along interdisciplinary borders of philosophy, theology, exegesis, historical and language sciences. His religious concerns are in this sense related to pre-philosophical experiences that within certain fields lend themselves to hermeneutical articulation. His analysis of the Scriptures in terms of narrativity deals with biblical texts. However, he doesn’t speak as a theologian,but as a philosopher, since the question of a philosophical and theological hermeneutics is from his own point of view closely related to the fundamentaltension between autonomy and heteronomy. This paper regards his work as a new form of French philosophy of religion, and as a result of this includes a criticalconsideration of the pre-textual sphere understood as an absolute “priority”. This absolute “priority” should be presupposed by any hermeneutics of the written revelation, even when it is not able to provide a final response to its radical-phenomenological implications.
76. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 17
Simona Bertolini Ist der Mensch auch ein Tier?: Zwei Antworten der phänomenologischen Tradition
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The phenomenological interpretation of the human being is not a naturalistic explanation. Likewise phenomenology does not interpret the human being as an example of a complex animal: from a phenomenological point of view man is not an animal, inasmuch as his definition and his essence imply a specifically human component, which cannot be attributed to the linear development of animal complexity. However, this does not mean that any animal component is excluded from the structure of humans. How can human animality be acknowledged without denying human specificity and upholding a reductionist view? The purpose of the paper is to analyse and compare two different ways in which the phenomenological tradition has answered this question.
77. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 19
Burkhard Liebsch „Herrscht“ Krieg ‒ seit je her, gegenwartig und auf immer?: „Polemologische“ Uberlegungen zur Frage, ob wir ihm ausgesetzt oder (auch) ausgeliefert sind
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay critically examines theories of war which imply an affirmation of the unavoidable rule of war. In contrast to such theories, the author advocates a notion of war that presupposes processes of becoming enemies, which eventually enthrone war as “dominating” power. From this position result a number of desiderata of research which call for a revision of actual theories of war.
78. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 1/2
Rolf Kühn Intensität, Gradualität und Extension
79. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 1/2
Ion Tǎnǎsescu Das Sein der Kopula: oder was hat Heidegger bei Brentano versäumt?
80. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 1/2
Otto Pöggeler Erinnerungen an Hans-Georg Gadamer