Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 81-100 of 581 documents

0.086 sec

81. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3
Miguel Sánchez-Mazas Sistemas Expertos
82. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3
León Olive Representación y resistencia al cambio científico
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In this paper, some theoretical problems about a relevant conceptualization helpful to understand resistance to scientific and technological change are discussed. An interpretative perspective is developed, and some concepts are elucidated, according to which certain processes become scientific changes because, among other things, but in a fundamental way, they are constituted as changes by members of a community. Certain cognitive processes are typified as “scientific”, “technological” and “scientific-technological”, and the importance of their relationship to processes of exploitation is stressed. It is suggested that resistance to changes increases and becomes more problematic when less exploitation is involved in the changes, i.e. when the processes are closer to what here is called scientific, rather than technological or scientific-technological knowledge. Some exampIes are drawn from the history of science to illustrate these ideas.
83. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3
Jesús Ezquerro Symposium Internacional sobre Noam CHOMSKY
84. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Ignacio Ayestaran Uriz Il International Simposium Galdeano (ZARAGOZA’94): Paradigms and Mathematics, Zaragoza, septiembre de 1994
85. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Francisco José Díez Ausín IV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy: FUZZY’94, Blanes, septiembre de 1994
86. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Ignacio Ayestarán Uriz EASST (European Association for the Study of Science and Technology) Conference on Science, Technology and Change: New Theories, Realities, Institutions, Budapest, agosto de 1994
87. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Violeta Demonte Lo sencillo es realo la explicación en la teoría lingüística
88. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Juan Bautista Bengoetxea, Xabier Eizagirre AFOS (Association for Foundations of Sciences, Language and Cognition) 1994 Workshop: Foundations of Science, Varsovia, agosto de 1994
89. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Juan José Acero Carnap y la imposibilidad de la semantica
90. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Francisco José Díez Ausín VI. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongreß: Leibniz und Europa, Hannover, julio de 1994
91. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Amedeo G. Conte Deóntica de la negación en Jerzy Sztykgold
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay deals with the concept of negation in Deontics. In relation with this concept, the polish logician Jerzy Sztykgold seems to put forward (in Negation of the norm, 1936) these two thesis: a) a norm may have a negation; b) a norm may be a negation. Sztykgold studies the concept of Inegation of a norm through the analysis of other two concepts (the concept of “insubsistence” or absence (brak) of a right or of a duty and the concept of opposition of behaviour), and, as early as 1936, he puts hirnself in a clear position in relation to the problem of the possibility of a logic of norms: There is a deontic analogonof truth, which is the słuszność (‘rightness’; ‘rightfulness’) consequently, for the norms, entities of which the słuszność is predicated, are valid the thesis of the propositional logic that are valid for the apophantic sentences.
92. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla Moulines y el realismo
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Moulines’ arguments against several types of realism in his book Pluralidad y recursion are considered and a defence of scientific realism consistent with structuralism is offered as a plausible answer to Moulines’ criticisms.
93. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Ana Rioja Los orígenes del principio de indeterminación
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The formulation in 1927 of the so called uncertainty principle by Werner Heisenberg was originated to resolve a problem with wich it apparently did not bear any relation: the possible intuitive content of the quantum theory, whose mathematic formalism had already been constituted at the end of 1925. The work’s objective consists in the detailed showing of the ideas which lead to it’s obtainment, apart from all discussion relative to the determinist or indeterminist behavior of atomic systems.
94. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Matthias Schirn Frege y los nombres de cursos de valores
95. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 1
Miembros de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España
96. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Manuel Antonio Correia Teoría de las variaciones y arte complicatorio de las ciencias en la Dissertatio de Arte Combinatoria (1666) de G. W. Leibniz
97. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Thomas E. Uebel Vigencia de La teoria de La ciencia de Otto Neurath
98. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
José Ramón Arana El enigma del “Parménides”
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
An interpretation of the “Parmenides” is proposed in base to the Plato’s “unwritten doctrines”. The greek author demonstrates in this dialogue that with the One only is impossible to think (hypothesis I), and this is why a principle of difference is required; that with the ontological conception of this difference neither, because contradictory conclusions would be followed (hypothesis II); and that without the One isimpossible to think, too (hypothesis III). These conclusions suggest the reader that the One is necessary to think, but another or other principles must be searched to stablish a dialectic. Plato confirms this way the parenetic character of his dialogues respecting at the same time the selfconstrained taboo of the “unwritten doctrines” (he doesn’t mention the undefinite dyad). To come to these conclusions the author ofthis paper proposes a plan of the second part of this work, that divides it in three hypothesis, not in eight, like is usual today, and analyzes the categories that sustain the argumentatives subdivisions of each one of the hypotheses: the structure of all the hypotheses is the same. All this in critical discussion with the actual bibliography about the topics.
99. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Miguel Sanchez-Mazas Colaboración
100. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Noticias de la SLMFCE (Sociedad de Lógica, Metodologia y Filosofia de la Ciencia en España)