Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 81-100 of 207 documents

0.064 sec

81. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Mark Roberts The Second Sense of Being
82. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Joseph Almeida Simplicius on Categories 1a16–17 and 1b25–27: An Examination of the Interests of Ancient and Modern Commentary on the Categories
83. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Joseph Almeida, Sarah Klitenic Wear Ancient and Medieval Interpretations of Aristotle’s Categories
84. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Lloyd P. Gerson The Aristotelian Commentaries and Platonism
85. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Gregory T. Doolan Aquinas on the Metaphysician’s vs. the Logician’s Categories
86. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Charlene Elsby Plotinus on the Reality of the Category of Relation
87. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Mark Gossiaux James of Viterbo on the Nature and Division of the Categories
88. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Sarah Klitenic Wear Syrianus the Platonist on Aristotle’s Categories 8a13–b24: The Ontological Place of Skhesis in Later Platonic Metaphysics
89. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Gary Gabor The Justification and Derivation of Aristotle’s Categories in Ammonius and Simplicius
90. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Lloyd A. Newton Platonic Elements in Albert the Great’s Commentary on the Categories
91. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 4 > Issue: 2
Andrew LaZella The Simplicity of Being in Duns Scotus’s Quaestiones Super Praedicamenta Aristotelis and Later Works
92. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Michael Krom Introduction to Must Morality be Grounded in God?
93. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
John Crosby Response to Mark C. Murphy’s “Suárez’s ‘Best Argument’ and the Dependence of Morality on God”
94. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Mark C. Murphy Suárez’s “Best Argument” and the Dependence of Morality on God
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
I want to begin by expressing misgivings about a standard way of making out a claim for the dependence of morality on God, misgivings that I do not have about a somewhat less standard way of arguing for this dependence. I will then consider a guiding maxim for how to proceed along this less standard way, a maxim that I draw from Suárez’s account of the relationship between divine activity and the activity of secondary causes. I then sketch one way of conceiving the dependence of morality on God that fits well with this Suarezian maxim.
95. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Paul Symington Response to John Rist’s “Must Morality be Grounded on God?”
96. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
John Rist Must Morality be Grounded on God?
97. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Christopher Tollefsen Morality and God
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper has three parts; in the first, I look at the question, recently dis­cussed by Mark Murphy, of the role that God plays as an explainer of moral­ity. I argue for a form of explanation that is different from Murphy’s, though I wonder whether there is disagreement here, or simply difference of empha­sis. In the second part, I ask what difference Christianity—and specifically the idea that the Kingdom of heaven is our natural ultimate end—makes to us, as practical and moral agents. I will argue that it makes both a moti­vational and a substantive difference. In the third part I will ask about the way normativity is related to God’s communication of normative matters to us, and I will do this specifically by asking what kinds of speech acts God engages in in communicating normative matters to us. The standard view is that God communicates to us in commands; however, I will suggest some other possibilities.
98. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Brian Donohue God and Aristotelian Ethics
99. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Jonathan J. Sanford Response to Christopher Tollefsen’s “Morality and God”
100. Quaestiones Disputatae: Volume > 5 > Issue: 1
Gregory Sadler Anselmian Moral Theory and the Question of Grounding Morality in God