Displaying: 1-20 of 569 documents

0.35 sec

1. Call to Earth: Volume > 2 > Issue: 1
Report on Books
2. Call to Earth: Volume > 2 > Issue: 2
Report on Books
3. Call to Earth: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1
Report on Books
4. Call to Earth: Volume > 3 > Issue: 2
Report On Books
5. Call to Earth: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1
Report on Books
6. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 1 > Issue: 4
INDEX
7. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 1 > Issue: 4
P. Aarne Vesilind, Richard J. Ellis, Lewis Ricci COMMENT
8. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
The Shape of Things to Come
9. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 10
10. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 10 > Issue: 4
CUMULATIVE FIVE-YEAR INDEX
11. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Beginning the Next Decade: Taking Stock
12. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 3
The Gospel of Chief Seattle is a Hoax
13. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
The Future is Now
14. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 11 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 11
15. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 12 > Issue: 4
INDEX TO VOLUME 12
16. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 13 > Issue: 4
INDEX
17. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 2
Changing Times
18. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 14 > Issue: 4
INDEX
19. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
Overcoming Environmental Newspeak
20. Environmental Ethics: Volume > 16 > Issue: 4
Body and Environment
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
My thesis is the biconditional that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies if and only if it is morally wrong to pollute the environment. The argument for each conditional is by analogy: pollution of one type is analogous to pollution of the other type in morally relevant respects. I argue that the truth of the biconditional makes it difficult to maintain that it is morally wrong to pollute human bodies without maintaining that it is morally wrong to pollute the environment and conversely.