PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Res Philosophica

Volume 93, Issue 1, January 2016

Travis Dumsday
Pages 79-101
DOI: 10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.7

Lowe's Unorthodox Dispositionalism

The deep differences between E. J. Lowe’s ontology of dispositions and that maintained by other prominent dispositionalists have received relatively little attention in the existing literature on his work. Here I lay out some of these differences, along the way attempting to clarify whether Lowe’s ontology can properly be termed ‘dispositionalist.’ I then argue that the unique features of his ontology allow it to avoid some well-known worries facing standard dispositionalism, while at the same time opening his view to novel objections. My overall aim here is neither to defend nor attack Lowe’s theory, but rather to assess some of its pros and cons and to consider its sometimes surprising implications (implications not always drawn out explicitly by Lowe).