artykuły |
1.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Bożena Czernecka-Rej
Bożena Czernecka-Rej
Czym jest pluralizm logiczny?:
(stanowisko J.C. Bealla i Grega Restalla)
What Is Logical Pluralism?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
C. Beall and Greg Restall are advocates of a comprehensive pluralist approach to logic, which they call Logical Pluralism (LP). According to LP, there is not one correct logic, but many equally acceptable logical systems. The authors share Tarski’s conviction and follow the mainstream in thinking about logic as the discipline that investigates the notion of logical consequence. LP is the pluralism about logical consequence – a pluralist maintains that there is more than one relation of logical consequence. According to LP, classical, intuitionistic and relevant logics are not rivals, but they all are equally correct, they all count as genuine logics.The purpose of this paper is to present some remarks concerning J.C. Beall’s and Greg Restall’s exposition of LP. At the beginning, the definition of the relation of logical consequence, which is central to their proposal, is shown. According to Beall and Restall, argument is valid if, and only if, in every case when the premisses are true, then the conclusion is, too. They argue that by considering different types of cases the logical pluralist obtains different logics.The paper—apart from presenting LP—also gives a critical discussion of this approach. It seems, that the thesis of LP is far from being clear. It is even unclear what exactly LP is and where is stops. It is unclear what “equally good”, “equally correct”, “equally true” mean. It is not clear, how to explain, in scope of logic, that the system of logic, is a model of real logical connections.
|
|
|
2.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Jacek Jarocki
Jacek Jarocki
Davida Chalmersa argument z logicznej możliwości istnienia zombi
David Chalmers’ Argument for the Logical Possibility of Zombies
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This paper presents a reconstruction of the argument for the logical possibility of zombies, proposed by David Chalmers, which has been debated in analytical philosophy for at least fifteen years now. Beside discussing it, I’m trying to analyze every of its premises. My aim is, especially, to present how the reasoning can show that: (a) zombies/zombie worlds are genuinely conceivable; (b) conceivability is a good guide to possibility; (c) the possibility of zombies is philosophicallysignificant. I’m particularly putting emphasis on some issues concerning two-dimensional semantics and distinctions of conceivability. The conclusion of this paper is that the argument is still not refuted, so a discussion over it should be conducted, instead of a priori refutation. The debate over zombies may have a positive influence on many fields of philosophical investigation.
|
|
|
3.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Tomasz Mróz
Tomasz Mróz
Radiowa adaptacja Platoskich dialogów w przekńadzie W. Witwickiego i jej recepcja na seminarium filozoficznym H. Jakubanisa w KUL
Radio Adaptation of the Plato’s Dialogues’ Translated by W. Witwicki and Its Reception at H. Jakubanis’ Philosophical Seminar in the Catholic University of Lublin
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The paper presents a little-known episode in the reception of Plato’s dialogues in Polish culture in the interwar period, namely the radio adaptation of the dialogues. The adaptation was based on four dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, all of them translated by Władysław Witwicki. This radio drama was very popular and was broadcasted several times. Its popularity followed the fact that the forefront of the Polish actors interpreted the outstanding Polish texts delivered by Witwicki. The paper presents the reception of the four mentioned above dialogues by the professional readers, philologists and the classic languages’ teachers. The radio drama constitutes entirely separate field of the influence of Plato’s works. Radio made Plato’s Socrates accessible to the unprofessional wide audience. There was, however, a peculiar case of reception of the radio drama among the listeners. It was applied for the didactic purposes by Henryk Jakubanis at his philosophical seminar which was carried in the interwar period in the Catholic University of Lublin.
|
|
|
4.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Dariusz Sagan
Dariusz Sagan
Naturalizm metodologiczny – konieczny warunek naukowości?
Methodological Naturalism—a Necessary Condition of Science?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Due to the success of Darwinian theory of evolution, with its methodological presuppositions, modern science is dominated by the principle of methodological naturalism, according to which only explanations invoking natural causes are acceptable in science. Supernatural or—in a broader sense—non-natural explanations, such as creationism or so-called intelligent design theory, are regarded as unscientific. The article analyzes the following questions: 1) Is it possible—contrary to methodological naturalism—to detect scientifically the marks of the activity of intelligent beings, both natural and supernatural, in bio-logical and cosmic processes and structures? 2) What are the implications of methodological naturalism for science defined realistically, that is understood as a search for truth about the world of nature? 3) If one accepts that the inner-scientific permissibility of concepts contradicting the principle of methodological naturalism is justified, would it be tantamount to the absolute exclusion of methodological naturalism as a principle directing the scientific inquiry?
|
|
|
5.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Joanna Klara Teske
Joanna Klara Teske
Moral Commitment of the Realistic, Modernist and Postmodern Novel
O moralnym zaangażowaniu powieści realistycznej, modernistycznej i postmodernistycznej
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The present paper discusses moral ideas expressed in the contemporary novel of the realistic, modernist and postmodern conventions. More precisely, it tries to define how the poetics of a given convention determines the novel’s ethical thought. It is argued that both the modernist and postmodern fiction, which are often perceived as amoral or relativist, are morally committed, though perhaps not as much as the realistic convention. The shape of this moral commitment is consistent with the dominant of each convention (epistemological in modernism and ontological in postmodernism). These theoretical considerations are subsequently illustrated with three case studies of Virginia Woolf’s novels (each of which represents a different convention). Throughout the whole essay the emphasis falls on the meaning of the novelistic form, i.e. on the way that the novel’s form conveys the novel’s interpretation of reality.
Przedmiotem tekstu są treści etyczne, jakie pojawiają się we współczesnej powieści realistycznej, modernistycznej i postmodernistycznej, a dokładniej – analiza tego, jak poetyka danej konwencji literackiej determinuje sposób ujęcia, ale i treść etycznych poglądów wyrażonych w utworze. Tekst broni tezy o etycznym zaangażowaniu modernistycznej i postmodernistycznej powieści, wbrew obiegowym opiniom, które głoszą, że są one albo amoralne (zdominowane przez postawę „sztuka dla sztuki”), albo relatywistyczne, zgodnie z duchem postmodernizmu. Analiza poetyki tych konwencji pozwala tymczasem sądzić, że każda z nich na swój własny sposób (zgodny z filozoficzną dominantą konwencji: epistemologiczną w modernizmie i ontologiczną w postmodernizmie), umożliwia podejmowanie problematyki etycznej, choć w sposób odmienny, niż miało to miejsce w konwencji realistycznej, niewątpliwie poświęcającej problematyce moralnej (zwłaszcza z zakresu etyki szczegółowej) najwięcej uwagi. Ogólne rozważania zilustrowane są studium trzech powieści Virginii Woolf, z których każda reprezentuje inną konwencję. W całej pracy przedmiotem rozważań jest treść formy (forma jest tu istotna jako sposób ukazania obrazu świata; zasadniczo pomijane są natomiast treści wyrażone w utworach w sposób nieformalny – poprzez konstrukcję świata przedstawionego czy też wprost poprzez wypowiedzi narratora, postaci itp.).
|
|
|
tłumaczenia |
6.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Ted A. Warfield, Małgorzata Polanowska, Marcin Iwanicki
Ted A. Warfield
Ockhamizm a molinizm:
przedwiedza i proroctwo
Ockhamism and Molinism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
recenzje |
7.
|
Roczniki Filozoficzne:
Volume >
61 >
Issue: 1
Jolanta Prochowicz
Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|