>> Go to Current Issue

Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines

Volume 19, Issue 4, Summer 2000
Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking

Table of Contents

Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-5 of 5 documents


articles
1. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines: Volume > 19 > Issue: 4
Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
2. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines: Volume > 19 > Issue: 4
Heini Hinkkanen Critical Thinking As the Objective of Anglo-American Educational Discourse
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines: Volume > 19 > Issue: 4
Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon Caring Reasoning
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
4. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines: Volume > 19 > Issue: 4
Clinton Collins Using Critical Thinking in Postmodern Ways: Elbow’s Methodological Believing
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
5. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines: Volume > 19 > Issue: 4
James Kaminsky Dangerous reading: Foucault and critical thought in the social science
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This text uses an analysis of the problem of “intertextuality” to deconstruct Foucault’s critique of bourgeois rationality as a suggestion for metaphors in the social sciences, education included. It accepts“intertextuality” as a space that dissolves the distance between subject, object, and text. In so doing “intertextuality” takes the postmodern suggestion that “fiction” can be as informative as “fact” seriouslyand evidentially uses examples from fiction to “show” the dangers of postmodern discourse. In closing this text suggests questions that must be resolved before postmodernism can be useful for the construction of metaphors in the social sciences.