|
1.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Wolfgang Detel
Knowledge and Context
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Desmond M. Clarke
Exorcising Ryle's Ghost from Cartesian Metaphysics
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
David Drebushenko
Abstraction and Idealism
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Manuel Cruz
On Pain. The Suffering of Wrong and other Grievances:
Responsibility.
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Eleni Papamichael
L' originalité et la non-originalité simultanée de la conception bergsonienne de l' espace
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Robert Mosimann
Parmenides:
An Ontological Interpretation
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Cigden Dürusken
A Philological Approach to Thales' Water Parable:
What does Thales Mean by Water?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Rubina Kousar Lodhi
Averroes' Theory of Elmentary Change
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Martha Husain
Aristotle's Concept of the Divine
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
James Danaher
David Hume and Jonathan Edwards On Reason, Miracles, and Religious Faith
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
book reviews |
11.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
A. Brook
Kants Early Critics:
The Empiricist Critique Of The Theoretical Philosophy
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
12.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Michael Ruse
Can a Darwinian Be a Christian?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
new editions |
13.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Howard V. Hong, Edna H. Hong
The Knight of Resignation and The Knight of Faith Ride Again
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
14.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Jonathan Lear
The Meaning of Life:
Aristotle's Pursuit of Happiness, Freud's Death Drive, and the Wealth of Other Possibilities in Between
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
15.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 3/4
Eli Friedlander
Signs of Sense
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 1/2
Richard McKirahan
Zeno's Dichotomy in Aristotle
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 1/2
Richard Gray
A Problem for the Aristotelian Solution to the Mind-Body Problem
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 1/2
Malte Hossenfelder
Autonomie als Problem der Bioethik
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 1/2
Safak Ural
Connectives and Temporality
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 1/2
Duncan Pritchard
A Puzzle about Warrant
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
A puzzle about warranted belief, often attributed to Kripke, has recently come to prominence. This puzzle claims to show that it follows from the possession of a warrant for one's belief in an empirical proposition that one is entitled to dismiss all subsequent evidence against that proposition as misleading. The two main solutions that have been offered to this puzzle in the recent literature - by James Cargile and David Lewis - argue for a revisionist epistemology which, respectively, either denies the so-called 'Closure' principle that warrants transmit across known entailments, or 'contextualizes' the epistemic operator in question. In contrast, it is argued here that such revisionism is unnecessary because the puzzle in fact depends upon an ambiguity in the notion of warrant. It is claimed that once this ambiguity is made explicit then the puzzle dissipates.
|
|
|