news and notes |
1.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
NEWS AND NOTES
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
features |
2.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Roger J. H. King
Environmental Ethics and the Built Environment
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
I defend the view that the design of the built environment should be a proper part of environmental ethics. An environmentally responsible culture should be one in which citizens take responsibility for the domesticated environments in which they live, as well as for their effects on wild nature. How we build our world reveals both the possibilities in nature and our own stance toward the world. Our constructions and contrivances also objectively constrain the possibilities for the development of a human way of life integrated with wild nature. An environmentally responsible culture should require a built world that reflects and projects care and respect toward nature.
|
|
|
3.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Shari Collins-Chobanian
Beyond Sax and Welfare Interests
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In “The Search for Environmental Rights,” Joseph Sax argues that each individual should have, as a right, freedom from environmental hazards and access to environmental benefits, but he makes clear that environmental rights do not exist and their recognition would truly be a novel step. Sax states that environmental rights are different from existing human rights and argues that the closest analogy is welfare interests. In arguing for environmental rights, I follow Sax’s direction and draw from the work of those who are the most relevant in establishing environmental rights. I consider Joel Feinberg’s notion of welfare interests, Henry Shue’s notion of basic rights, and James Nickel’s right to a safe environment. I draw from Mill’s harm principle, the superfund legislation, and the Clean Air Act to illustrate the existing ethical and legal bases for establishing environmental rights. Finally, I discuss positive and negative duties that such rights might carry
|
|
|
4.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Vinay Lal
Gandhi and the Ecological Vision of Life
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Although recognized as one of the principal sources of inspiration for the Indian environmental movement, Gandhi would have been profoundly uneasy with many of the most radical strands of ecology in the West, such as social ecology, ecofeminism, and even deep ecology. He was in every respect an ecological thinker, indeed an ecological being: the brevity of his enormous writings, his everyday bodily practices, his observance of silence, his abhorrence of waste, and his cultivation of the small as much as the big all equally point to an extraordinarily expansive notion of ecological awareness.
|
|
|
discussion papers |
5.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Amy L. Goff-Yates
Karen Warren and the Logic of Domination:
A Defense
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Karen Warren claims that there is a “logic of domination” at work in the oppressive conceptual frameworks informing both sexism and naturism. Although her account of the principle of domination as a connection between oppressions has been an influential one in ecofeminist theory, it has been challenged by recent criticism. Both Karen Green and John Andrews maintain that the principle of domination,as Warren articulates it, is ambiguous. The principle, according to Green, admits of two possible readings, each of which she finds flawed. Similarly, Andrews claims that the principle is fundamentally inadequate because it cannot distinguish cases of oppressive domination from cases of nonoppressive domination. In this paper, I elucidate Warren’s views and defend her against these and other criticisms put forward by Green and Andrews. I show that Warren’s account of “the logic of domination” successfully illuminates important conceptual features of oppression.
|
|
|
6.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Rick O’Neil
Animal Liberation versus Environmentalism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Animal liberationism and environmentalism generally are considered incompatible positions. But, properly conceived, they simply provide answers to different questions, concerning moral standing and intrinsic value, respectively. The two views together constitute an environmental ethic that combines environmental justice and environmental care. I show that this approach is not only consistent but defensible.
|
|
|
book reviews |
7.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Timothy Sprigge
Environmental Ethics and Process Philosophy
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Christian Hunold
Geopolitics and the Green Revolution:
Wheat, Genes, and the Cold War
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
David Rothenberg
The Great, New Wilderness Debate
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
10.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Greta Gaard
Woman the Hunter
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
C. John Powers
Buddhism and Ecology:
The Interconnection of Dharma and Deeds
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
12.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Allen Carlson
Placing Nature:
Culture and Landscape Ecology
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Christopher J. Preston
Philosophy and Geography I:
Space, Place, and Environmental Ethics
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
14.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
David Macauley
The Fate of Place:
A Philosophical History
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
comment |
15.
|
Environmental Ethics:
Volume >
22 >
Issue: 2
Philip Ryan
Gare, MacIntyre, and Tradition
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|