|
81.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Robert C. Scharff
Becoming Hermeneutical:
How The Young Heidegger Prepared For Thinking
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
82.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51 >
Issue: Supplement
William McNeill
On the Essence and Concept of Ereignis
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
83.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Sean D. Kirkland
Heidegger and the Hermeneutic of Destruktion
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
84.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51 >
Issue: Supplement
Andrew J. Mitchell
What Is Called Drinking?: Heidegger, Wine, and Loss
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
85.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Dana S. Belu, Patricia Glazebrook, Richard Polt, Tom Sheehan
Das Ge-Stell: What does it mean? What is its source?
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
86.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Margot Wielgus
The Wind of Thought:
Heidegger’s Remembrance and the Technological
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
87.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Babette Babich
Gelassenheit and Aether in Hebel and Hölderlin or: Love and the Life of Plants
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
88.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Ammon Allred
Approaching the Desert:
Uncanniness, Metaphoricity and Time in Hölderlin, Heidegger and Carson
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
89.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Lawrence J. Hatab
Redescribing the Zuhanden-Vorhanden Relation
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
90.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Andrew MacDonald
Can Dasein Be Indifferent?
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Heidegger’s ontology consists of three general categories of beings: present-at-hand, ready-to-hand, and Dasein. Beings in the latter category, namely human beings, are said to exist in either one of two modes; either authentically or inauthentically. In recent years, however, it has been suggested we distinguish a third mode. This third mode, ‘indifference’ as it has come to be known, is motivated by the need to mitigate the tendentious relationship between the two functions of inauthenticity. Inauthenticity serves in a positive capacity as the source of a shared context of significance, while also functioning in the more negative role as the fundamental barrier to authenticity. Introducing this third mode of indifference allows us to split the difference, as it were, between these two seemingly incompatible functions of inauthenticity. This paper argues for a different approach. I want to suggest these two roles of inauthenticity can be made sense of using Heidegger’s distinction between genuine and non-genuine ways of disclosure. This would allow Heidegger to maintain the integrity of inauthenticity without giving up on the formal value-neutral status of this ontological distinction.
|
|
|
|
91.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Rex Gilliland
The Four Theses on Being:
Reconstructing Div. III of Being and Time
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
92.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Adam Knowles
Heidegger as a Nazi Bureaucrat:
An Archival Report
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
93.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Justin White
Explaining Van Gogh’s Shoes:
A Heideggerian Response to Schapiro
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
94.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Róisín Lally
Digital Art: The New Cultural Landscape
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
95.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Christopher Merwin
Thinking Nature Inceptually:
From the Open Region to φύσις, and the Concept of Nature
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
96.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Magdalena Holy-Luczaj
Implications of Heidegger’s Thought for Postnatural Environmentalisms
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
97.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Brendan Mahoney
Learning to Dwell Freely in the Technological Landscape:
Heidegger and Burtynsky on Art and Environmental Ethics
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
98.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Lawrence A. Berger
Attention As The Way To Being
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
99.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
S. West Gurley
Attention is Political:
How Phenomenology Gives Access to the Inconspicuously Political Act of Attending
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
100.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
50
Richard Capobianco
Bill Richardson’s (Future) Legacy:
‘Heidegger I’ and ‘Heidegger II’ Underscored in the Black Notebooks
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Bill Richardson’s masterwork Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought was first published in 1963. What follows is fully informed by his guiding and enduring insight: the “turn” (die Kehre) in Heidegger’s thinking, which, Bill referred to—in his memorable heuristic expression—as “Heidegger I” and “Heidegger II.” From his book: “For the shift of focus from There-being to Being…was demanded…as soon as it became clear [to Heidegger] that the primacy of the Being-process belongs to Being itself” (HTPT, 624). Let us see how Bill’s basic reading is further borne out and underscored in the recently published Black Notebooks.
|
|
|