Cover of Southwest Philosophy Review
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 21-28 of 28 documents


commentaries
21. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Cheryl Abbate Comments on “Epistemic Involuntarism and Undesirable Beliefs” by Deborah Heikes
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
22. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Songyao Ren Commentary on Green’s “Recalcitrant Beliefs and Epistemic Akrasia”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
23. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
John R. Harris Utilitarianism, Derivative Obligations, and the Problem of Political Obligation
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
24. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Sarah Woolwine Comments on Josué Piñeiro “Rilkean Memory and Testimonial Injustice”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
open submission articles
25. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Miles Hentrup Skepticism and Negativity in Hegel’s Philosophy
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
26. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Tori Helen Cotton The Problem With Who I Know: What Contextualism Can Tell Us About Interpersonal Knowledge Claims
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
27. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Domenica Romagni Descartes On Referring the Passions
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
As suggested by the title, Descartes’ Passions of the Soul deals primarily with states of the soul that he calls ‘passions.’ This designation includes all mental states that are actively caused by the body and passively received by the soul. However, as Descartes points out to the reader, there is a more specialized or proper usage of ‘passion’ that picks out a subclass of these and which aligns more-or-less with what we might now call ‘emotions.’ In this paper, I will address how Descartes classifies these ‘proper passions,’ paying special attention to how he distinguishes them from the other species of the passions in general. One of my primary aims will be to highlight an under-appreciated feature of the proper passions; namely, that they are distinct from other perceptions in their systematic divergence in terms of their distal or ‘first’ cause, their intentional object, and how they are ‘referred.’ After arguing for this distinctive feature of the proper passions, I show how it enables Descartes to provide a nuanced and multi-faceted account of our emotional experiences that incorporates external sensory perceptions, internal or bodily perceptions, and various cognitive assessments.
book review
28. Southwest Philosophy Review: Volume > 39 > Issue: 2
Josef Novák Review of The Selected Writings of Jan Patočka: Care for the Soul
view |  rights & permissions | cited by