Cover of The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law
Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 81-99 of 99 documents


81. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3
Anne-Taylor Cahill Embyronic Stem Cells: Science Ethics and Public Policy: Conference Report
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
82. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3
Elizabeth A. Corley Stephen F. Haller’s Apocalypse Soon? Wagering on Warnings of Global Catastrophe
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
83. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 2
William J. FitzPatrick, Lee L. Zwanziger Defending Against Biochemical Warfare: Ethical Issues Involving the Coercive Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologics in the Military
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
84. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 2
Avner Levin The Problem of Observation
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
85. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1
David B. Resnik A Biotechnology Patent Pool: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper discusses the idea of forming a patent pool in order to address some of the licensing problems in the biotechnology industry. The pool would be an independent, non-profit corporation that would manage patents and have the authority to grant licenses. The patent pool would not be a purely altruistic venture, since it would charge licensing fees. The pool would charge the market price for licensing services and reimburse patent holders for licensing activities. The pool would also provide patent holders with a minimum income based on a percentage of royalties generated from the pool. The pool would include patents on a variety of materials and methods that play an important role in biotechnology. It would also be international in scope, with the power to grant licenses in different countries.
86. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1
Doug Jesseph James Franklin’s The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
87. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 7
Jennifer Douglas-Vidas, Marsha E. Reichman What Role Should Rules, Guidelines, and Education Play in the Responsible Conduct of Research?: A National Conference Addresses the Issue
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
88. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 6
Kimarie R. Stratos David Guston’s Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
89. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 5
Norman K. Swazo For “Just Results”: Questioning National Missile Defense Research in Alaska
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
90. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 5
Susanne B. Haga, Joann A. Boughman Are Health Professionals Prepared for the Task of Integrating Genetics into Healthcare?: A National Conference Considers the Question
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
91. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 4
Richard Haigh, Mirko Bagaric Immortality and Sentencing Law
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The time may not be far away where we may be able to live much longer than we do now – potentially forever. This will have an enormous impact on the way people live their lives as the underlying premise that life is finite underpins many of the central decisions and life choices we make. This paper outlines some philosophical and legal doctrines that are based on the premise that life is finite and some of the changes that may need to occur in light of medical advances in ageing. In particular, it focuses on the changes to sentencing law that may be necessary to accommodate increased human longevity. For the skeptics who refuse to accept the concept of immortality, the arguments presented do not depend on living forever. Some of the issues discussed here are also relevant, albeit in an attenuated manner, because of increases in human longevity that have occurred in the last 100 years.Babies born 30 years hence may grow up with such perfect cellular maintenance that they will never age, dying only by accident or choice. Will we get the benefits of these discoveries? Maybe not – we might be, sadly, the last mortal generation. But who knows – if we can keep ourselves alive and healthy, maybe some of these treatments will be retrofitted into our ailing bodies and make us new again.... If you are lucky you may see 3000, or even live indefinitely. We need to discuss, well ahead of time, whether that would be desirable. Me, I’m voting for life over death.
92. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 3
Brent Garland Bioethics and Bioterrorism
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
93. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 2
Bryn Williams-Jones Commercial Surrogacy and the Redefinition of Motherhood
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
94. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 2 > Issue: 1
Michelle R. Detwiler Balancing Scientific Freedom and National Security after September 11th
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
95. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 1 > Issue: 2
Cary P. Gross Financial Conflict of Interest and Medical Research: Beware the Medical-Industrial Complex
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
96. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 1 > Issue: 2
Tanya Williams, Scott Siera, Arri Eisen Reconciling Science and Society
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
97. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1
Susan Haack An Epistemologist in the Bramble-Bush: At the Supreme Court With Mr. Joiner
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
98. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1
Annabelle Lever Ethics and the Patenting of Human Genes
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
99. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1
Mark S. Frankel “The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts”
view |  rights & permissions | cited by