41.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Michael Davis
Second Thoughts on Multi-Culturalism
|
|
|
42.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Peg Tittle
Identity Politics as a Transposition of Fraser’s Needs Politics
|
|
|
43.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Howard Klepper
Intimacy and Parental Authority in the Philosophy of Ferdinand Schoeman
|
|
|
44.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
William C. Gay
Bourdieu and the Social Conditions of Wittgensteinian Language Games
|
|
|
45.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Robert F. Ladenson
What Is a Disability?
|
|
|
46.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Peter J. Mehl
William James’s Ethics and the New Casuistry
|
|
|
47.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Hans Lenk, Matthias Maring
Responsibility and Social Traps
|
|
|
48.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Clifton B. Perry
Is Being a Carrier of a Disability, a Disability?
|
|
|
49.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 1
Galina Iachkina
An Essay in the Applied Philosophy of Political Economy
|
|
|
50.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Mike W. Martin
Professional Distance
|
|
|
51.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Andrew R. Bailey
Neurosis:
A Conceptual Examination
|
|
|
52.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Michael C. LaBossiere
Racial Identity and Oppression
|
|
|
53.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Stephen Nathanson
How (Not) to Think About the Death Penalty
|
|
|
54.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Joseph Sartorelli
The Nature of Affirmative Action, Anti-Gay Oppression, and the Alleviation of Enduring Harm
|
|
|
55.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Michael Davis
The Justification of Arbitrary Death
|
|
|
56.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Iddo Landau
Are You Entitled to Affirmative Action?
|
|
|
57.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
Louis Pojman
In Defense of the Death Penalty
|
|
|
58.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
11 >
Issue: 2
A.A. Howsepian
Cinematic Realism and Right to Die Legislation
|
|
|
59.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
12 >
Issue: 1
Roger Paden
Defining Philosophical Counseling
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
According to Kuhn a new scientific discipline comes into existence when a group of scientists adopt a common paradigm within which to conduct research. The adoption of this paradigm senes to focus the attention of the group’s members on a common explanatory task-at-hand and leads them to adopt similar methods and aims, thus making possible the standard puzzle solving activities that allow normal science to advance rapidly. However, Kuhn argues, in pre-paradigm periods and during revolutionary phases, scientists do not engage in such singleminded, puzzle-solving behavior, as the paradigm itself is put into question. Instead, during these periods, they become at least partially self-reflective in that they become interested in understanding the nature of their discipline and its relationships to other disciplines. In this paper, I argue that Philosophical Counseling is in a pre-paradigm period and is in need of a paradigm centered definition if it is to develop an identity and advance rapidly. In an Aristotelian mood, I seek this definition though an examination of the related fiends of psychotherapy and pastoral counseling.
|
|
|
60.
|
International Journal of Applied Philosophy:
Volume >
12 >
Issue: 1
William Sweet
Human Rights and Cultural Diversity
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
In this paper, I discuss some challenges to the discourse of universal human rights made by those who insist that the existence of pluralism and cultural diversity count against it. I focus on arguments made in a recent article by Vinay Lal but also address several other criticisms of universal human rights-arguments hinted at, but not elaborated, by Lal. I maintain that these challenges frequently fail to distinguish the discourse of human rights from its adoption by certain states to advance foreign policy objectives, and suggest that, even when these criticisms appear plausible, closer inspection reveals that they are either inconsistent or simply do not succeed. I conclude that the notion of universal human rights still has an important place in a culturally diverse and pluralist world.
|
|
|