Displaying: 421-440 of 906 documents

0.15 sec

421. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
Rev. Kevin D. O’Rourke, O.P. The Embryo as Person
422. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
John M. Travaline, M.D., F.A.C.P. Medicine
423. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
Peter A. Pagan Darwinian Ideology or Universal Teleology?: Science, Causation, and Providence
424. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
Lawrence Masek A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer
425. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
Rev. Christopher M. Saliga, OP, RN Freedom at the End of Life: Voluntary Death versus Human Flourishing
426. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
William L. Saunders, Jr. Washington Insider
427. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 2
Sarah Smith Bartel Welcoming the Child at Birth
428. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Patrick Guinan, M.D. Medical Ethics versus Bioethics (a.k.a. Principlism)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The Hippocratic ethic, or medical ethics, has guided medical practitioners for 2,500 years. More recently it has been displaced by bioethics. Traditional medicalethics is a covenant between a competent physician and a sick patient, the purpose of which is to effect healing. Bioethics is a civil consensual ethic regulating health-care delivery. It is not personal by nature.Medical ethics is a deontological, virtue-based ethic. Bioethics, particularly as expressed in principlism, its most prominent school in the United States, isa liberal utilitarian ethic that emphasizes individual autonomy.Bioethics and principlism both play a role in guiding health-care delivery in a pluralistic society. However, traditional medical ethics, and not bioethics, bestaddresses the moral issues arising in the personal relationships between a treating physician and a suffering patient.
429. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Christopher Oleson Nature, “Naturalism,” and the Immorality of Contraception
430. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Rev. Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco Science
431. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
David B. Hershenov Explaining the Psychological Appeal of Viability
432. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
John M. Travaline, M.D., F.A.C.P. Medicine
433. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
William E. May The Misinterpretation of John Paul II’s Teaching in Evangelium vitae n. 73
434. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Brian D. Parks The Natural-Artificial Distinction and Conjoined Twins: A Response to Judith Thomson’s Argument for Abortion Rights
435. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Christopher Kaczor The Violinist and Double-Effect Reasoning
436. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
William L. Saunders, Jr. Washington Insider
437. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Nicholas Tonti-Filippini, John I. Fleming, Gregory K. Pike, Ray Campbell Ethics and Human-Animal Transgenesis
438. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 6 > Issue: 4
Rev. Romanus Cessario, O.P. Catholic Considerations on Palliative Care
439. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Greg F. Burke, M.D., F.A.C.P. Medicine
440. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly: Volume > 7 > Issue: 1
Austin Ruse Radical Social Policy at the United Nations