421.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
Rev. Kevin D. O’Rourke, O.P.
The Embryo as Person
|
|
|
422.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
John M. Travaline, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medicine
|
|
|
423.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
Peter A. Pagan
Darwinian Ideology or Universal Teleology?:
Science, Causation, and Providence
|
|
|
424.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
Lawrence Masek
A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer
|
|
|
425.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
Rev. Christopher M. Saliga, OP, RN
Freedom at the End of Life:
Voluntary Death versus Human Flourishing
|
|
|
426.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
William L. Saunders, Jr.
Washington Insider
|
|
|
427.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 2
Sarah Smith Bartel
Welcoming the Child at Birth
|
|
|
428.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Patrick Guinan, M.D.
Medical Ethics versus Bioethics (a.k.a. Principlism)
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The Hippocratic ethic, or medical ethics, has guided medical practitioners for 2,500 years. More recently it has been displaced by bioethics. Traditional medicalethics is a covenant between a competent physician and a sick patient, the purpose of which is to effect healing. Bioethics is a civil consensual ethic regulating health-care delivery. It is not personal by nature.Medical ethics is a deontological, virtue-based ethic. Bioethics, particularly as expressed in principlism, its most prominent school in the United States, isa liberal utilitarian ethic that emphasizes individual autonomy.Bioethics and principlism both play a role in guiding health-care delivery in a pluralistic society. However, traditional medical ethics, and not bioethics, bestaddresses the moral issues arising in the personal relationships between a treating physician and a suffering patient.
|
|
|
429.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Christopher Oleson
Nature, “Naturalism,” and the Immorality of Contraception
|
|
|
430.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Rev. Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco
Science
|
|
|
431.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
David B. Hershenov
Explaining the Psychological Appeal of Viability
|
|
|
432.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
John M. Travaline, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medicine
|
|
|
433.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
William E. May
The Misinterpretation of John Paul II’s Teaching in Evangelium vitae n. 73
|
|
|
434.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Brian D. Parks
The Natural-Artificial Distinction and Conjoined Twins:
A Response to Judith Thomson’s Argument for Abortion Rights
|
|
|
435.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Christopher Kaczor
The Violinist and Double-Effect Reasoning
|
|
|
436.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
William L. Saunders, Jr.
Washington Insider
|
|
|
437.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Nicholas Tonti-Filippini, John I. Fleming, Gregory K. Pike, Ray Campbell
Ethics and Human-Animal Transgenesis
|
|
|
438.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
6 >
Issue: 4
Rev. Romanus Cessario, O.P.
Catholic Considerations on Palliative Care
|
|
|
439.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Greg F. Burke, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medicine
|
|
|
440.
|
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Austin Ruse
Radical Social Policy at the United Nations
|
|
|