Displaying: 361-380 of 1412 documents

0.112 sec

361. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 19 > Issue: 8/9
Krzysztof Stachewicz Henryk Elzenberg Wager for Values. Axiological and Methodological Aspects
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The wager for values proposed by Henryk Elzenberg seems to be an interesting and important problem in axiological thinking. That is why one should take a close look at Elzenberg’s reasoning and at certain consequences of such point of view. We analyze this problem as a parallel to Pascal’s Wager for God. One should live and act as if God existed—it is an effect of Pascal’s Wager. One should live and behave as if perfect values existed—this is the essence of Elzenberg’s wager. Paralel analysis of both standpoints lets us formulate numerous hypotheses and statements especially in axiology.
362. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 19 > Issue: 8/9
Ryszard Wiśniewski On the Benefits of Studying Elzenberg’s Axiology and Ethics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article takes up some fundamental topics of Henryk Elzenberg’s axiological and ethical thought, whose philosophical attitude was called a religion of values. Author focuses his attention especially on Elzenberg’s recognizing value as a process of giving life meaning and importance and the role of reason in intuitive cognition of value, on attempt to gain insight into world of negative values, on effort of ordering of relative values, on the process of displacing imperative function of ethics by advisory and recommending function. In the end the author considers the place of transcendentalism in the ethics of Elzenberg.
363. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 19 > Issue: 8/9
Agnieszka Nogal The Concept of Freedom in Henryk Elzenberg’s Thought
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Elzenberg opposes the rightness of violence. This is a horizon on which appears a space for freedom in its two dimensions, which contemporarily is defined as negative and positive. Elzenberg’s negative freedom—necessary and essential—is freedom from one’s own biologicality but also from violence, whilst positive freedom—desired and valuable—the freedom to pursue values, is conditioned by the first.Man can be enslaved by his own body, the force applied by political authority or by ideology. He will not pursue truth then. He can do this only by freeing himself through satisfying his elementary needs and by way of asceticism from biological determinism, ignoring the sphere of political pressure, and reaching the truth in order to contemplate and realize beauty and good. Freedom is opposed on the one hand by biology and on the other, by violence. Force therefore, even when it is used in the name of truth, opposes the very principle in whose defense it has been enlisted.
364. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga The 19th-Century French Thought
365. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga The “I” Identity. Eidos
366. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Categories as Layers of Intellectual Formations
367. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Warsaw Positivism
368. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Is Positivism an Anti-National Orientation?
369. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga The History of Science and Intellectual Formations
370. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga, Jacek Dobrowolski Evil
371. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga, Jacek Dobrowolski What Is Called Thinking
372. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga European Culture and Its Imperatives
373. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga The Significance of the Metaphysical in Culture
374. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Comte’s World Outlook: The French Positivism of the First Half of the 19th Century
375. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Nothingness and Fullness
376. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga Citizenship
377. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 1/2
Barbara Skarga, Aleksander Sitkowiecki Between Eclecticism and Positivism
378. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 11/12
Philip Cafaro The Way Forward for Environmental Ethics: Ending Growth and Creating Sustainable Societies
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The overarching goal of environmentalism as a political movement is the creation of sustainable societies that share resources fairly among people, and among people and other species. The core objectives of environmental philosophy should include articulating the ideals and principles of such just and generous sustainability, arguing for them among academics and in the public sphere, and working out their implications in particular areas of our environmental decision-making. That means challenging the goodness of endless economic growth and helping other environmental thinkers specify plausible and appealing alternatives to the economic status quo. It means ending our craven failure to honestly address population issues. It means committing to living according to our own environmental ideals. Interestingly, the mainstream philosophical tradition has some important, underutilized resources that, combined with new andcreative thinking, can help us achieve these goals and keep ethical philosophy relevant to meeting the challenges of the 21st century.
379. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 11/12
Lesław Michnowski Global Governance and Information for the World Society’s Sustainable Development
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The current crisis is an open phase of a global crisis. It is a result of a false recognition of this structural crisis, previously described in the Limits to Growth Report. This crisis is not a result of overpopulation, but of the world society's maladjustment to life in a State of Change and Risk. In this rather new situation, obsolescence (moral destruction) of life-forms not adapted to new life-conditions is the main life-destroying and crisis-generating factor.To permanently overcome this crisis, we have to reinforce the UN “three pillars” world society sustainable development strategy by including into it the task of building an information basis of sustainable-development policy and economy (including a global early warning system). To achieve sustainable development, what we also need to create includes a subsidiarity-principle-based UN Sustainable Development Council with the World Sustainable Development Strategy Center, including the UN Global Dynamic Monitoring Information Center.
380. Dialogue and Universalism: Volume > 20 > Issue: 11/12
Joel Jay Kassiola The Social Power of Environmental Ethics: How Environmental Ethics Can Help Save the World through Social Criticism and Social Change
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Environmental ethics has an identity and public image problem. Unlike the other applied ethics subfields like biomedical or business ethics, environmental ethics is surprisingly devalued and even rejected as a possible contributor to confronting effectively the global environmental crisis by anti-environmental philosophers and public policy analysts. Thus, environmental ethics has many critics, both within and outside of philosophy, who strongly challenge the contemporary, practical social relevance of this academic field.In contrast to this critical viewpoint, this essay argues for the profound significance of environmental ethics to the environmental crisis, and, in that way, seeks to present a successful rebuttal to the misguided critiques of this area of philosophy. The argument aims to demonstrate how environmental ethics can facilitate social criticism of the prevailing modern social values and the social institutions associated with the market or consumer capitalist society built upon them. My approach will center its insights and prescriptions upon the philosophical grounding of the collective movement for ecologically-and ethically-based social criticism and social change.I conclude the essay by emphasizing: 1) the normative nature of environmental problems (as opposed to an exclusive scientific or technological conception of such problems), and 2) environmental ethics and philosophy as powerful catalysts for necessary social change in order to save the world through social criticism of the status quo ecologically unsustainable and unethical (exemplified by unjust) modern social values such as, limitless economic growth. These points support the upshot that much more is at stake in the controversy over the nature and value of environmental ethics than the typical academic debate: nothing less then the fate of our planet.