61.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Problém abstraktních pojmů:
Odpověď Davidu Peroutkovi
|
|
|
62.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Dilinganae Disputationes. Der Lehrinhalt der gedruckten Disputationen an der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Dillingen.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
63.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Peter Hoenen SJ
Descartův Mechanicismus:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
64.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 1
Rastislav Nemec
The Eternity of God. Comparative Study of Bernard Lonergan SJ and Richard Swinburne.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
65.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
Člověk a stát:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
66.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Metafyzika jako věda. Ibn Síná a Ibn Rušd ve scholastické diskusi.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
67.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Michal Chabada
700-lecie śmierci bł. Jana Dunsa Szkota. Międzynarodowe sympozjum jubileuszowe:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
68.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Lukáš Novák
Ján Duns Scotus. Vybrané kapitoly z jeho epistemológie a metafyziky.:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
69.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík, Karel Šprunk
G. Frege:
Dialog s Pünjerem Český překlad s kritickým výkladem
|
|
|
70.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Jan Palkoska
Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The aim of the article is to critically assess the widespread surmise according to which Descartes was in certain important aspects of his thought infl uenced by Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations. In the article this question is addressed with regard to the problem of the ontological background of the representational acts of a finite mind. Descartes’ position is reconstructed on the basis of an analysis of Meditation III and consequently of Descartes’ polemic with Johan de Kater in the First Objections and Replies; the reconstruction is accomplished by means of terms and concepts commonly used in the late scholastic thought of the end of the 16th century. An analysis of the key passage of Section 2 of Disputation 54 of the Metaphysical Disputations of Suárez (concerned with the distinction between extrinsic denominations and beings of reason) then shows, first, that Suárez’s position concerning the ontology of mental representation does indeed agree with that of Descartes, not Kater; second, that the implications of Suárez’s critique of certain theses concerning the identity of extrinsic denominations and beings of reason probably form an important part of the conceptual framework presupposed in the polemic between Decartes and Kater.
|
|
|
71.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Michal Chabada
Náčrt Whiteheadovej procesuálnej filozofie:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
72.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Marián Kuna
Etika cnosti podľa Tomáša Akvinského:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
73.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Ad multos annos:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
74.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Stanislav Sousedík
The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
75.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Peter Volek
Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus: Solving Puzzles about Material Objects:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
76.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 1
Karel Šprunk
Das Wagnis, ein Mensch zu sein Studien zur neuzeitlichen Philosophie:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
77.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
Jakub Jinek
Přátelství, dobro, polis. K významu přátelství v celku Aristotelovy praktické filosofie:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Aristotle’s subtle distinction between the forms of friendship and his concept of loving friend as one’s other self propose a solution to the fundamental objection to any eudaimonian theory of slavery, namely that friendship – as basically non-moral phenomenon – is but an egoistic device of one’s happy life. Aristotelian theorems are based on his concept of analogy and on a philosophically specific notion of “self”. Since both of these are rooted in Platonism, Aristotle has toevolve them dialectically in a critical distance to Plato. Still, his dialectical theory of friendship needs to be rooted not in metaphysics but in political theory after all. Political friendship as a utopian perspective taken by each of the citizens in their pursuit of a close relationship with any other indicates a notion of “infinity as perfection” which presents the decisive step beyond Plato and toward the later course of the history of philosophy.
|
|
|
78.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
Andrea Blaščíková
Úvod do etiky ctnosti:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
79.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
Daniel Heider
K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky „Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu“:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|
80.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
8 >
Issue: 1
Ondřej Kočnar
Bůh jako vysvětlení:
A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism
|
|
|