21.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Michael J. Murray
Critical Review of Cover and Hawthorne on Leibnizian Modality
|
|
|
22.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Abbreviations Used in Articles and Reviews
|
|
|
23.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Herbert Breger
News from the Leibniz-Gesellschaft
|
|
|
24.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Robert Merrihew Adams
Trinità e Incarnazione:
Il rapporto tra filosofia a teologia rivelata nel pensiero di Leibniz
|
|
|
25.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Christia Mercer
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe:
Series VI, volume 4
|
|
|
26.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Massimo Mugnai
Two Leibniz Texts with Translations:
LH IV 1, 9 r and LH IV 1, Bl. 24 r
|
|
|
27.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
10
Recent Works on Leibniz
|
|
|
28.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Catherine Wilson
Response to Ohad Nachtomy’s “Individuals, Worlds, and Relations:
A Discussion of Catherine Wilson’s ‘Plenitude and Compossibility in Leibniz’”
|
|
|
29.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
J. E. H. Smith
Der logische Aufbau von Leibniz’ Metaphysik
|
|
|
30.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Robert Merrihew Adams
Scritti filosofici
|
|
|
31.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Patrick Riley
Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Vierte Reihe (Politische Schriften), Band 4
|
|
|
32.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Maria Rosa Antognazza
Debilissimae Entitates?:
Bisterfeld and Leibniz’s Ontology of Relations
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Over the past decades a number of scholars have identified Johann Heinrich Bisterfeld as one of the most decisive early influences on Leibniz. In particular, the impressive similarity between their conceptions of universal harmony has been stressed. Since the issue of relations is at the heart of both Bisterfeld and Leibniz’s doctrines of universal harmony, the extent of the similarity between their doctrines will depend, however, on Bisterfeld and Leibniz’s respective theories of relations, and especially on their ontologies of relations. This paper attempts to determine in more detail whether Bisterfeld’s ontology of relations contains at least the germ of the defining features of the ontology of relations later developed by Leibniz. It comes to the conclusion that, although Bisterfeld’s theory of relations is not as fully developed and explicit as that of Leibniz, it does contain all the key “ingredients” of it.
|
|
|
33.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Richard Arthur
Leibniz on Infinite Number, Infinite Wholes, and the Whole World:
A Reply to Gregory Brown
|
|
|
34.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Acknowledgments, Abbreviations Used in Articles and Reviews
|
|
|
35.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Facsimiles of François Lamy’s ‘De la Conoissance de soi-même’, second edition, 1699 Title Page, 1701 Title Page, and Volume 2, pp. 224-43 and 387-92.
|
|
|
36.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Samuel Levey
The Young Leibniz and His Philosophy (1646-76)
|
|
|
37.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
News from the Leibniz-Gesellschaft
|
|
|
38.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Ohad Nachtomy
Individuals, Worlds, and Relations:
A Discussion of Catherine Wilson’s “Plenitude and Compossibility in Leibniz” (The Leibniz Review, Vol. 10, 2000, 1-20)
|
|
|
39.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
R.S. Woolhouse
Leibniz and François Lamy’s De la Connaissance de soi-même
|
|
|
40.
|
The Leibniz Review:
Volume >
11
Recent Works on Leibniz
|
|
|