E-Collection
LOGIN
PRODUCTS
All Products
Online Resources
Journals & Series
Digital Media
Books & Reference Works
E-Collection
About
Alphabetically
By Category
By Type
Price Lists
Terms and Conditions
MEMBERSHIPS
Societies & Associations
Conference Registrations
SERVICES
Conference Exhibits
Conference Registrations
Electronic Publishing
Journal Advertising
Mailing Lists
Marketing Services
Membership Services
Production Typesetting
Subscription Fulfillment
ABOUT
About us
Contact
FAQs
Order Info
Privacy
Support
Search narrowed by:
English
[x]
Berkeley Studies
[x]
Narrow search
By category:
History of Philosophy
85
Major Philosophers
85
By publication type:
Journal
85
By language:
English
85
By journals:
Berkeley Studies
85
By document type:
Announcement
13
Article
33
Book Review
26
Miscellaneous
13
Search for:
*:*
Additional hits:
38217
in PDC Directory
ADVANCED SEARCH
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
or
and
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
or
and
All
Text
Title
Author
Abstract
All of the words
Any of the words
Date Range (years) from
to
Clear
Results per page:
20
50
100
Sort by:
Relevance
Date - recent first
Date - oldest first
Title
Publication
Author
<
1
2
3
4
5
Displaying: 81-85 of 85 documents
0.014 sec
81.
Berkeley Studies:
Volume
>
30
Takaharu Oda
Review: The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley, ed. Samuel C. Rickless
view
|
rights & permissions
82.
Berkeley Studies:
Volume
>
30
Manuel Fasko
A Revised Metaphysical Argument for Berkeley’s Likeness Principle
abstract
|
view
|
rights & permissions
Contra Todd Ryan’s interpretation, I argue that it is possible to reconstruct a metaphysical argument that does not restrict likeness in general to ideas. While I agree with Ryan that Berkeley’s writings provide us with the resources to reconstruct such an argument, I disagree with Ryan that this argument entails a restriction of likeness to ideas. Unlike Ryan, I argue that Berkeley is not committed to the claim that we can compare only ideas, but to the view that the only thing that can be compared to an idea is another idea.
83.
Berkeley Studies:
Volume
>
30
Dávid Bartha
Why Can’t Animals Imagine? Berkeley on Imagination and the Animal‒Human Divide
abstract
|
view
|
rights & permissions
In this paper, I present and analyze Berkeley’s sporadic claims on the animal‒human divide, concentrating on his early works, especially his Notebooks. Before drawing our attention to the importance of imagination, I start by contextualizing Berkeley’s views on animal cognition more generally. More specifically, I aim to clarify that though he verbally agrees with Descartes that animals cannot imagine like we do, Berkeley’s view is motivated by fundamentally different considerations. What he ultimately denies is that animals can imagine in a sense that requires the sort of spontaneous and creative activity we share more with God than animals.
84.
Berkeley Studies:
Volume
>
30
Recent Works on Berkeley (2018 – 2023)
view
|
rights & permissions
85.
Berkeley Studies:
Volume
>
30
News and Announcements
view
|
rights & permissions
<
1
2
3
4
5