101.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Robert C. Scharff
Becoming Hermeneutical:
How The Young Heidegger Prepared For Thinking
|
|
|
102.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Dana S. Belu, Patricia Glazebrook, Richard Polt, Tom Sheehan
Das Ge-Stell: What does it mean? What is its source?
|
|
|
103.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Babette Babich
Gelassenheit and Aether in Hebel and Hölderlin or: Love and the Life of Plants
|
|
|
104.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Margot Wielgus
The Wind of Thought:
Heidegger’s Remembrance and the Technological
|
|
|
105.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Sean D. Kirkland
Heidegger and the Hermeneutic of Destruktion
|
|
|
106.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Ammon Allred
Approaching the Desert:
Uncanniness, Metaphoricity and Time in Hölderlin, Heidegger and Carson
|
|
|
107.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Lawrence J. Hatab
Redescribing the Zuhanden-Vorhanden Relation
|
|
|
108.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Rex Gilliland
The Four Theses on Being:
Reconstructing Div. III of Being and Time
|
|
|
109.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Andrew MacDonald
Can Dasein Be Indifferent?
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Heidegger’s ontology consists of three general categories of beings: present-at-hand, ready-to-hand, and Dasein. Beings in the latter category, namely human beings, are said to exist in either one of two modes; either authentically or inauthentically. In recent years, however, it has been suggested we distinguish a third mode. This third mode, ‘indifference’ as it has come to be known, is motivated by the need to mitigate the tendentious relationship between the two functions of inauthenticity. Inauthenticity serves in a positive capacity as the source of a shared context of significance, while also functioning in the more negative role as the fundamental barrier to authenticity. Introducing this third mode of indifference allows us to split the difference, as it were, between these two seemingly incompatible functions of inauthenticity. This paper argues for a different approach. I want to suggest these two roles of inauthenticity can be made sense of using Heidegger’s distinction between genuine and non-genuine ways of disclosure. This would allow Heidegger to maintain the integrity of inauthenticity without giving up on the formal value-neutral status of this ontological distinction.
|
|
|
110.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Adam Knowles
Heidegger as a Nazi Bureaucrat:
An Archival Report
|
|
|
111.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Justin White
Explaining Van Gogh’s Shoes:
A Heideggerian Response to Schapiro
|
|
|
112.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Róisín Lally
Digital Art: The New Cultural Landscape
|
|
|
113.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Christopher Merwin
Thinking Nature Inceptually:
From the Open Region to φύσις, and the Concept of Nature
|
|
|
114.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Magdalena Holy-Luczaj
Implications of Heidegger’s Thought for Postnatural Environmentalisms
|
|
|
115.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Brendan Mahoney
Learning to Dwell Freely in the Technological Landscape:
Heidegger and Burtynsky on Art and Environmental Ethics
|
|
|
116.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
S. West Gurley
Attention is Political:
How Phenomenology Gives Access to the Inconspicuously Political Act of Attending
|
|
|
117.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
51
Lawrence A. Berger
Attention As The Way To Being
|
|
|
118.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
28
Daniel Dahlstrom
Heidegger's Method:
Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications
|
|
|
119.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
28
Barbara Mahoney
Phenomenology and the Idea of Science
|
|
|
120.
|
Heidegger Circle Proceedings:
Volume >
28
Travis Tenney Anderson
The Forgotten Mystery of Dasein
|
|
|