Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 1-20 of 50 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.162 sec

1. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Břetislav Horyna Břetislav Horyna
Hegels Ausspruch „Gott ist tot“ in Hinsicht auf Kant und Fichte
Hegel’s Statement “God is dead” with Respect to Kant’s and Fichte’s Philosophies

view |  rights & permissions
2. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Dagmar Pichová Dagmar Pichová
Ironie u Pascala
Irony in Pascal’s Work

view |  rights & permissions
3. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Ivana Holzbachová Ivana Holzbachová
Pojetí role vědy v politice u Emila Durkheima
Emile Durkheim’s Conception of the Role of Science in Politics

view |  rights & permissions
4. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Michal Vavřík Michal Vavřík
K interpretaci Hegelovy filosofie státu
A Contribution to the Interpretation of Hegel’s Philosophy of State

view |  rights & permissions
5. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 56 > Issue: 1/2
Antonín Dolák Antonín Dolák
Heideggerova metoda a světlina bytí
Heidegger’s Method and Category Lichtung

view |  rights & permissions
6. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Josef Petrželka, Jan Váně Josef Petrželka
Filosofie a divadlo
Filosofie a divadlo

7. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Jan Váně, Josef Petrželka Jan Váně
Abélard a Heloisa
Abelard and Heloise

view |  rights & permissions
8. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Jan Váně, Josef Petrželka Jan Váně
Jan Hus a Stanislav ze Znoyma
John Huss and Stanislav of Znoymo

view |  rights & permissions
9. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Josef Petrželka, Ondřej Sládek Josef Petrželka
Filosof(ie) a žena
Philosophy(-pher) and the woman

view |  rights & permissions
10. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Ištván Tračník Ištván Tračník
BRAIN MAN aneb Ať žije evoluce!
Brain Man or Long Live Evolution!

view |  rights & permissions
11. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Radovan Burhan Radovan Burhan
Světská pokušení Pána z Heideggeru aneb Kdo byl Hitlerův otec?
Profane Seduction of the Lord of Heidegger or Who Was Hitler’s Father?

view |  rights & permissions
12. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Josef Petrželka, Rudolf Šnajder, Jana Gajdošová Josef Petrželka
Tenkrát ve filosofii
Once Upon a Time in Philosophy

view |  rights & permissions
13. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Michal Stránský Michal Stránský
Pro dobrou věc. Hra o několika dějstvích a žádném intermezzu
For a Good Thing. A Play of Several Acts and No Intermezzo

view |  rights & permissions
14. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Josef Petrželka Josef Petrželka
Jak najít pravého prince?
How to Find the Right Prince

view |  rights & permissions
15. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Jana Matiščíková, Josef Krob, Josef Petrželka Jana Matiščíková
Kladivo na časoděj
The Hammer of Time

view |  rights & permissions
16. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 58 > Issue: 1
Petr Kopáček Petr Kopáček
Možný svět nutně nestačí aneb Hra pro Kočku
A Possible World Is Not Necessarily Enough or A Play for a Cat

view |  rights & permissions
17. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Lenka Hořínková Kouřilová Pelikánova reflexe Hoppeova díla
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article presents how Pelikan reflected Hoppe’s work in Ruch filosofický. Pelikan dealt with Hoppe’s philosophical development and simultaneously noticed philosophers that were inspiring for Hoppe’s philosophy. Pelikan appraised the significance of Hoppe’s work in Czech philosophical thinking of the first half of the twentieth century and his acccent of spiritual life. Pelikan agreed with Hoppe’s extension of the doctrine of intuition although his conception of intuition was different from Hoppe.
18. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Jan Zouhar Existencialismus a české myšlení 1945–1948
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
After 1945, Czech philosophy and culture were first introduced to existentialism. First it was the original works of French existentialists (Sartre, Camus, Marcel), later by means of the journal Letters (1947) and Václav Černý (The first book on existentialism, 1948). The acceptance of existentialism in Czech context was not univocal. Besides factual analyses (J. Patočka, V. Navrátil, V. T. Miškovská), existentialism met with criticism and rejection mainly from Marxists and Catholic scholars for its rational weakness, pessimism, helplessness and intellectual decline.
19. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Klaus Vieweg Morální světový názor. K Hegelově kritice praktického rozumu transcendentální filosofie
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The transition from morality to the morals involves the dissolution of the antagonism of the moral, the overcoming of the antinomy of constant obligation. In his Wissenschaft der Logik, Hegel focuses on the logical defect of endless progress “mostly in its ap­plication to morality“ (RPh, § 268). Pure will and the moral law on the one hand, and nature and empiricality on the other “presuppose each other as fully independent and mutually indifferent“, and thus the opposition is postulated as an axiom, which excludes its overcoming the antagonism. The antagonism “does not dissolve in infinite progress. It is, on the contrary, depicted as unsolved and unsolvable, and thus confirmed“. The result is “the very same antagonism that stood at the beginning“ (RPh, § 269 an.). The progress ad infinitum exhibits itself as antagonism that unjustly points to itself as a solution of what contradicts itself (WdL 5, p. 166). The real overcoming of this antinomy fails; the idea of the Judgment Day solution owes the answer and is only an expression of excessive gentleness towards the world. Antinomies and collisions in moral action in the end separate, which implies the persistence in insuperable antinomy. Another topic would be a detailed exposition of Hegel’s solution proposal. In any case, Hegel sees the naturalness of speculative thought in the necessity to think the ideality of both of the opposing sides, that is, to understand them beforehand as the moment of the concept of moral action, see them as opposing in their moving unity and think them as the transition from morality to the moral action, the morals, in which the antagonism of the moral is not abstractly lost, but elevated, guarded and overcome.
20. Studia Philosophica: Volume > 60 > Issue: 1
Helena Zbudilová Spásná trýzeň: Miguel de Unamuno a nesmrtelnost
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The study deals with the conception of personal immortality in Miguel de Unamuno’s works. The starting point of his reflections is a particular person of “flesh and blood“ and his authentic existence. Unamuno’s “hunger of immortality“ is inspired by man’s confrontation with the phenomenon of death. For Unamuno existential phenomena of suffering and anxiety seem to be the keyword to the authentic existence and God then becomes a guarantor of individual immortality. The study concentrates on Unamuno’s conception of God in the spirit of panentheism and Spanish Krausism. It observes Unamuno’s philosophical sources of information when discussing the question of immortality from Pythagoras to Platon while opposing the views of impersonal immortality (e.g. B. Spinoza). His theological argumentation is based mainly on S. Kierkegaard, St. Paul and Spanish mystics. His philosophical ideas are extracted especially from his works The Tragic Sense of Life, The Agony of Christianity and The Intimate Diary. His novella Saint Emmanuel The Good, Martyr serves as a fictional illustration of his ideas. The study concludes with the evaluation of Unamuno as an author writing “philosophizing literature“ and as a predecessor of existentialist literature, who was orientated towards Christian personalism.