Search narrowed by:

Narrow search

By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:

Displaying: 101-120 of 421 documents

0.33 sec
101. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2005 > Issue: 31
Bertrand’s break
102. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2005 > Issue: 32
Bertrand’s break
103. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2006 > Issue: 33
Hilary Puttman The next big thing
104. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2006 > Issue: 33
Bertrand’s break
105. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2006 > Issue: 34
Bertrand’s break
106. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2006 > Issue: 35
Bertrand’s break
107. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2006 > Issue: 36
Bertrand’s break
108. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2007 > Issue: 37
Bertrand’s break
109. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2007 > Issue: 38
Bertrand’s break
110. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2007 > Issue: 39
Bertrand’s break
111. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 1998 > Issue: 4
Q&A
112. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2008 > Issue: 40
Are birthdays for kids?
113. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2008 > Issue: 40
Bertrand Russell Bertrand’s break
114. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2009 > Issue: 44
A hefty bag of cats
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Imperfection is either a half-empty bottle or a half-full one: we can just as well argue that our relative experience justifies a degree of objectivity as that it shows all facts or all values to be irredeemably subjective. But most Western philosophers throughout history seem to have assumed that imperfection is a half-empty bottle – often with disastrous results.
115. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2010 > Issue: 48
Gary Cox Q & A
116. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2010 > Issue: 49
Gregory Currie Q & A
117. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 1999 > Issue: 5
Sue Johnson Bertrand's Break
118. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 1999 > Issue: 5
Q&A
119. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2010 > Issue: 51
Philosophers’ football rematch
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The original Python sketch is the stuff of comedy legend. But why put on a tribute to it nearly 40 years later? I asked the organiser, Peter Worley. His idea of the match was as a profile raiser for his “fourth R” campaign, which promotes reasoning as a basic skill that should be taught alongside reading, writing and arithmetic. How better to do that, he thought, than by restaging the Python football match?
120. The Philosophers' Magazine: Year > 2010 > Issue: 51
John M. Heaton Q & A