21.
|
Translational Hermeneutics:
Year >
2015
Lothar Černý
Hidden Hermeneutics: The Beginnings of Translation Studies in Germany after World War II
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This paper introduces some of the most infl uential fi gureheads in the emerging field of Translation Studies in East and West Germany after World War II. It outlines the reasons why Translation Studies parted from the traditional hermeneutical approach to translation. On the other hand it traces theresurgence of a new hermeneutical inquiry into the process of translation in the new, basically linguistic approaches and their science orientation.
|
|
|
22.
|
Translational Hermeneutics:
Year >
2015
Larisa Cercel, Radegundis Stolze, John Stanley
Hermeneutics as a Research Paradigm
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The historical overview covering Schleiermacher and the disciplinary status of translational hermeneutics was written by Cercel, the sections on important concepts and research within the paradigm of translational hermeneutics was authored by Stolze, and Stanley wrote the last three sectionsdealing with language games, a concrete research project and the role of phenomenology in research. The text was geared towards providing some background information on translational hermeneutics, a field which has bearing not only on the practice of translation but also on research in TS. From the vantage point of translational hermeneutics, research in translation studies takes its point of departure from the translator’sperspective: The guiding question is one centered on how a translator deals with the texts he or she has to translate.
|
|
|
23.
|
Translational Hermeneutics:
Year >
2015
Brian O’Keeffe
Prologue to a Hermeneutic Approach to Translation
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The purpose of this essay is to explore the place Hans-Georg Gadamer makes for the activity of translation within his philosophy of interpretation. In general terms, the interest of Gadamer’s approach lies in the effort to inscribe translation within what is described as the ‘hermeneutic circle’. This essay accordingly offers a brief, but detailed account of the Gadamerian arc of interpretation, but suggests that the critical issues – along the lines suggested by Werner Hamacher in his book Premises – concern the way in which the circle begins to turn, and furthermore, how one actually enters the hermeneutic circle. If these are matters basic to the Gadamerian way with textual interpretation tout court, the principal claim of this essay is that it is the translatorwho experiences the most serious diffi culties in beginning, and indeed, in entering the ambit of hermeneutics. In detailing these particular difficulties, one reaches a limit-case of the hermeneutical interpreter – the translator as one to whom Gadamer grants a privileged place in his philosophy, but also as one who reveals to hermeneutics the nature of the problems that beset hermeneutic philosophy from the outset.
|
|
|
24.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Jun Abe
The Phenomenological Study of Life by Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Yogācāra Buddhism
|
|
|
25.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Rafal Smoczynski
Lacan and Merleau-Ponty: Affective Intentionality
|
|
|
26.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Andras Ronai
Authentic and Second-Order expression: The Child, the Poet and Ordinary Language
|
|
|
27.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Alice Koubova
Thought between Dream and Body
|
|
|
28.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Petr Kouba
Topology of Dialogue
|
|
|
29.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Kurt Dauer Keller
Institution — A Generative Structuring of Meaning
|
|
|
30.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Tetsuo Sawada
Analyse phénoménologique du comportement enfantin chez Maurice Merleau-Ponty
|
|
|
31.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Leslie Kavanaugh
A Place to Stand
|
|
|
32.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Jaroslav Trnka
Corporeity and Metaphysics. Deconstruction between “Good” and “Bad” Dialectics
|
|
|
33.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
April Flakne
All the Elements, Except Air: Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze on the Possibility of Others
|
|
|
34.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Lester Embree
Objects Inside and Outside the Body According to Dorion Cairns
|
|
|
35.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Marek Pokropski
Différance and Hiatus: Derrida and Merleau-Ponty on the Subject's Constitution
|
|
|
36.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Fabrice Bothereau
Merleau-Ponty, Whitehead, and the NATURE of Nature
|
|
|
37.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Elena Bovo
La temporalité de l'inconscient. Merleau-Ponty et Derrida lecteurs de Freud
|
|
|
38.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Giedrė Šmitienė
Speech that Stems from Body, or Body that Flows through Language
|
|
|
39.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Zsigmond Szabo
Becoming and Infinity
|
|
|
40.
|
Thinking in Dialogue with Humanities:
Year >
2011
Taylor S. Hammer
Cartesian Ontology and “Eye and Mind”
|
|
|