21.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
21 >
Issue: 3
Megan Laverty
Philosophy
|
|
|
22.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
23 >
Issue: 4
Richard O. Odiwa
Africa’s Quest for a Philosophy of Decolonization
|
|
|
23.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
24 >
Issue: 1/2
Neil Levy
Conspiracy Theories:
The Philosophical Debate
|
|
|
24.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
24 >
Issue: 1/2
Claude Gratton
Arguments about Arguments:
Systematic, Critical and Historical Essays in Logical Theory
|
|
|
25.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
30 >
Issue: 2
David Wright
Review of The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education Part V “Critical Thinking and the Cognitive Sciences”
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This review essay discusses three articles from the Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (eds. Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett) concerned with outlining the connection between cognitive science and critical thinking. All of the authors explain how recent findings in cognitive science, such as research on heuristics and cognitive biases (e.g. framing effects, the availability heuristic) might be incorporated into the critical thinking curriculum. The authors also elaborate on how recent findings in metacognition can reshape critical thinking pedagogy. For instance, the essays articulate how critical thinking instructors would be wise to broaden the scope of traditional critical thinking content by instructing students in the metacognitive strategies of self-regulation, cognitive monitoring, and evaluation in order to encourage better decision making both inside and outside the classroom.
|
|
|
26.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
30 >
Issue: 2
Benjamin Hamby
Review of Stephen Brookfield‘s Teaching for Critical Thinking
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Stephen Brookfield offers a distinctive conceptualization of and approach to teaching critical thinking. In this review I highlight some major aspects of his approach, and critique his baseline conception. I conclude that, while evaluating assumptions is an important aspect of critical thinking, it is not as important as Brookfield maintains. Instructors of critical thinking should read his book, but they should remain skeptical of its major substantive theoretical commitments.
|
|
|
27.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
Maria Sanders
Review of The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This essay reviews five articles from Part VII in The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (Davies & Barnett, 2015) entitled “Social Perspectives on Critical Thinking.” In this section, the authors explore critical citizenship, critical pedagogy, and knowledge practices of critical thinking. It is a diverse collection of essays ranging from broad discussions on the topics included to specific applications and particular examples demonstrating criticality in higher education classrooms.
|
|
|
28.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 3
Jeffrey Maynes
Review of Mercier and Sperber’s The Enigma of Reason
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
In The Enigma of Reason, Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber (2017) defend the proposal that reason is a specialized module which produces intuitions about reasons. Reason serves two functions: for individuals to justify their own judgments and actions to themselves and others, and to persuade others. In this review, I briefly summarize the central claims of the book, critically examine Mercier and Sperber’s arguments that reason is not a general faculty underlying our inferential abilities, and explore the pedagogical implications of their work.
|
|
|
29.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
24 >
Issue: 1/2
Neil Levy
Conspiracy Theories:
The Philosophical Debate
|
|
|
30.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
24 >
Issue: 1/2
Claude Gratton
Arguments about Arguments:
Systematic, Critical and Historical Essays in Logical Theory
|
|
|
31.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
25 >
Issue: 1
David Kennedy
Qu’est-ce qu’un homme? Dialogue de Leo, Chien sagace, et de son Philosophe, Dessins de Lionel Koechlin. [What is a man? A dialogue between Leo the wise dog and his philosopher. Drawings by Lionel Koechlin.]
|
|
|
32.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
25 >
Issue: 1
Graham McDonough
For Goodness Sake:
Religious Schools and Education for Democratic Citizenry
|
|
|
33.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
28 >
Issue: 2
Linda Carozza
A Review of Good Reasoning Matters! by Leo A. Groarke and Christopher Tindale
|
|
|
34.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
28 >
Issue: 3
Maralee Harrell
THiNK: Critical Thinking for Everyday Life By Judith A. Boss
|
|
|
35.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
28 >
Issue: 3
Daniel Fasko, Jr.
A Review of the Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (HCTA)
|
|
|
36.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
29 >
Issue: 1
Phillip Crenshaw, Ph.D.
Review of Critical Thinking: An Introduction
|
|
|
37.
|
Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1
John D. Eigenauer
Review of Enlightenment Now
|
|
|