301.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
Ilia Kalinin
Ajalooprotsessi semiootiline mudel:
ajalugu — grammatika ja retoorika vahel. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
302.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
М. Паладян
Karakterisatsiooni funktsioon olevikus. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
303.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
Winfried Nöth
Kujutiste uurimise semiootilised alused. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
304.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
31 >
Issue: 2
Maria Goltsman
On some graphic regularities of perception in painting and dance:
Mnemonic form of dance. Abstract
|
|
|
305.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
John Deely
Semiotics and Jakob von Uexküll’s concept of umwelt
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Semiotics, the body of knowledge developed by study of the action of signs, like every living discipline, depends upon a community of inquirers united through the recognition and adoption of basic principles which establish the ground-concepts and guide-concepts for their ongoing research. These principles, in turn, come to be recognized in the first place through the work of pioneers in the field, workers commonly unrecognized or not fully recognized in their own day, but whose work later becomes foundational as the community of inquirers matures and ‘lays claim to its own’. As semiotics has matured, the work of Jakob von Uexküll in establishing the concept of Umwelt has proven to be just such a pioneering accomplishment for the doctrine of signs, and in this paper I trace out some of the lines of development according to which Uexküll’s concept came to occupy its central place in semiotics today.
|
|
|
306.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Kalevi Kull
Uexküll ja uusajajärgne evolutsionism. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
307.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Dario Martinelli
Muusikaline ring:
Omailma teooria, rakendatuna zoomusikoloogias. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
308.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Jui-Pi Chien
Skeem kui elu võti ja mõistatus:
peegeldusi Uexkülli probleemile. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
309.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Kalevi Kull
Юкскюлл и постмодернистский эволюционизм. Резюме
|
|
|
310.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Anton Markoš
In the quest for novelty:
Kauffman’s biosphere and Lotman’s semiosphere
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
The emergence of novelty in the realm of the living remains, despite the long tradition of evolutionary biology, unwelcome, calling for explanation by old, established knowledge. The prevailing neodarwinian evolutionary paradigm approaches living beings as passive outcomes of external (and extraneous, hence “blind”) formative forces. Many teachings opposing Darwinism also take the existence of eternal, immutable and external laws as a necessary prerequisite. Ironically enough, authors who oppose Darwinian theory, and admit that living beings possess a “self”, often accentuate internal, ideal and eternal harmony,which is incompatible with historical changes; moreover such harmony is again imposed by external, atemporal “laws”. I describe here a third approach embodied by the names of two unrelated scholars, Stuart Kauffman (biology, physics) and Juri Lotman (semiotics, culturology). Their approach suggests thatthe evolution of organisms, minds, cultures — is a continuous negotiation (semiosis) of ‘laws’, driving to ever broader spaces of freedom and constantly larger autonomy of existence.
|
|
|
311.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Cornelius Steckner
Формирование символа. Резюме
|
|
|
312.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Anton Markoš
Поиск новшества:
биосфера Кауффмана и семиосфера Лотмана. Резюме
|
|
|
313.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
John Michael Krois
Философия биологии Эрнста Кассирера. Резюме
|
|
|
314.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Cornelius Steckner
Sümboliloome. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
315.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Thure von Uexküll
Eye witnessing Jakob von Uexküll’s Umwelttheory
|
|
|
316.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Han-liang Chang
Semiotician or hermeneutician? Jakob von Uexküll revisited
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Like other sciences, biosemiotics also has its time-honoured archive, consisting, among other things, of writings by those who have been invented and revered as ancestors of the discipline. One such example is Jakob von Uexküll who has been hailed as a precursor of semiotics, developing his theory of “sign” and “meaning” independently of Saussure and Peirce. The juxtaposition of “sign” and “meaning” is revelatory because one can equally legitimately claim Uexküll as a hermeneutician in the same way as others having claimed him as a semiotician. Such a novel temptation can be justified by Uexküll’s prolonged obsession with Sinn and Bedeutung since his first book in 1909. This paper attempts to reconstruct the immediate intellectual horizon of Uexküll’s historicity, a discursive space traversed by his contemporaries Frege and Husserl, in order to see how Uexküll’s discussions of Zeichen and Gegenstand, Sinn and Bedeutung, were informedby other philosophers of language, and to establish Uexküll as a phenomenological hermeneutician in the tradition of Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer. To forestall and counter possible criticism that hermeneutics is primarily concerned with textual interpretation, while Uexküll is at most an interpreter of animal life, the paper will discuss his unfinished parody of the Platonic dialogue Meno, which is entitled Die ewige Frage: Biologische Variationen über einen platonischen Dialog (1943). It is through such textual practice that one witnesses the emergence of an Uexküll who embodies at once the addressee exercising his understanding of ancient texts as well as the second addresser recoding his explanation to another group of targeted addressees. This textual practice already goes beyond the confines of biology and in fact involves the linguistic pragmatics of rhetoric and speech act.
|
|
|
317.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Dario Martinelli
Музыкальный круг:
теория умвельта применительно к зоо-музыкологии. Резюме
|
|
|
318.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Florian Mildenberger
Tõug ja hingamisteraapia:
Lothar Gottlieb Tirala (1886–1974) elukäik. Kokkuvõte
|
|
|
319.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Riin Magnus, Timo Maran, Kalevi Kull
Jakob von Uexküll Centre, since 1993
|
|
|
320.
|
Sign Systems Studies:
Volume >
32 >
Issue: 1/2
Kalevi Kull, Torsten Rüting
From the editors of this volume
|
|
|