Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 61-80 of 770 documents

0.058 sec

61. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Contributors
62. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Matthew Quest C.L.R. James’ New Notion
63. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Evgeni V. Pavlov The Current Crisis and the Cost of Capitalism
64. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Peter Stone “An Aristotle’s Eye View”
65. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan Under Discussion: The Chickenhawk Syndrome: War, Sacrifice, and Personal Responsibility
66. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Matt Applegate The Multivoiced Body
67. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan Replies to Anatole, Michael, and Harry
68. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden From Combat Boots to Civilian Shoes: Reflections on The Chickenhawk Syndrome
69. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Executive Editorial Committee and Editorial Board
70. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Call For Articles
71. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Peter Gratton Editors’ Introduction
72. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Jordy Rocheleau License to Kill: Rethinking War’s Ethical Boundaries
73. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Lasse Thomassen Derrida, Time, and Political Subjectivity
74. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Richard Ganis Caring for Nature in Habermas, Vogel, and Derrida: Reconciling the Speaking and Nonspeaking Worlds at the Cost of “Re-enchantment”?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
En rapport with Jürgen Habermas, this paper argues for an environmental ethics that formalistically links the “good-for-nature” to the communicatively conceived “good-for-humanity.” This orientation guards against the possibility of humanity’s “knowledge-constitutive interest” in the instrumentalization of the environment being pressed forth as a project of limitless domination and mastery. Such an ethics is nonetheless well supplemented with Axel Honneth’s idea of an “indirect” recognitional attitude toward the world of objects, which accommodates the impulse of “care” for nature without succumbing to the aporias of a naturalistic ethic. The essay contends that the categorical resources needed to avert the slide toward naturalism are dissolved in the antifoundationalist “critiques of nature” advanced by Steven Vogel and Jacques Derrida.
75. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Harry van der Linden Editor’s Introduction
76. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Call for Papers
77. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Contributors
78. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Randall Williams The Ballot and the Bullet: Anti-Juridical Praxis from Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela to the Bolivarian Revolution
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay examines multiple iterations of anti-juridicalism in relation to shifting forms of postwar imperialism and decolonization. The anti-juridical designates a differential political praxis of rights and law grounded in conditions of subalternity and revolutionary struggle. It stands in opposition to the abstract, neutraluniversality advanced by dominant theories of liberallegalism and hegemonic conceptions of the rule of law. In contemporary modalities, anti-juridical praxis serves as a necessary, critical supplement to the articulation of constituent power in the postcolony with profound implications for constructing a state of law and justice, and for building of a new internationalism of peoples.
79. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Melissa A. Mosko Toward a New Humanity
80. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 14 > Issue: 1
Elizabeth Purcell Fetishizing Ontology: Julia Kristeva and Slavoj Žižek on the Structure of Desire
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Recently Slavoj Žižek has critiqued certain "feminist" readings of Lacan's feminine structure of desire, including Julia Kristeva, for postulating a feminine discourse which is supposedly beyond the phallic economy. This paper defends Kristeva's position, both by noting how Žižek Hegelian ontology prevents him from utilizing the resources of sexual difference and by clarifying Kristeva's double account of maternity. One consequence of this investigation is that a Kristevean theory of desire will provide one with a new form of political intervention by isolating sites of resistence that Žižek disavows. Another consequence is a refiguration of "feminist" psychoanalytic practice.