81.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Mark Roberts
The Second Sense of Being
|
|
|
82.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Joseph Almeida
Simplicius on Categories 1a16–17 and 1b25–27: An Examination of the Interests of Ancient and Modern Commentary on the Categories
|
|
|
83.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Joseph Almeida, Sarah Klitenic Wear
Ancient and Medieval Interpretations of Aristotle’s Categories
|
|
|
84.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Lloyd P. Gerson
The Aristotelian Commentaries and Platonism
|
|
|
85.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Gregory T. Doolan
Aquinas on the Metaphysician’s vs. the Logician’s Categories
|
|
|
86.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Charlene Elsby
Plotinus on the Reality of the Category of Relation
|
|
|
87.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Mark Gossiaux
James of Viterbo on the Nature and Division of the Categories
|
|
|
88.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Sarah Klitenic Wear
Syrianus the Platonist on Aristotle’s Categories 8a13–b24: The Ontological Place of Skhesis in Later Platonic Metaphysics
|
|
|
89.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Gary Gabor
The Justification and Derivation of Aristotle’s Categories in Ammonius and Simplicius
|
|
|
90.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Lloyd A. Newton
Platonic Elements in Albert the Great’s Commentary on the Categories
|
|
|
91.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
4 >
Issue: 2
Andrew LaZella
The Simplicity of Being in Duns Scotus’s Quaestiones Super Praedicamenta Aristotelis and Later Works
|
|
|
92.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Michael Krom
Introduction to Must Morality be Grounded in God?
|
|
|
93.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
John Crosby
Response to Mark C. Murphy’s “Suárez’s ‘Best Argument’ and the Dependence of Morality on God”
|
|
|
94.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Mark C. Murphy
Suárez’s “Best Argument” and the Dependence of Morality on God
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
I want to begin by expressing misgivings about a standard way of making out a claim for the dependence of morality on God, misgivings that I do not have about a somewhat less standard way of arguing for this dependence. I will then consider a guiding maxim for how to proceed along this less standard way, a maxim that I draw from Suárez’s account of the relationship between divine activity and the activity of secondary causes. I then sketch one way of conceiving the dependence of morality on God that fits well with this Suarezian maxim.
|
|
|
95.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Paul Symington
Response to John Rist’s “Must Morality be Grounded on God?”
|
|
|
96.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
John Rist
Must Morality be Grounded on God?
|
|
|
97.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Christopher Tollefsen
Morality and God
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
This paper has three parts; in the first, I look at the question, recently discussed by Mark Murphy, of the role that God plays as an explainer of morality. I argue for a form of explanation that is different from Murphy’s, though I wonder whether there is disagreement here, or simply difference of emphasis. In the second part, I ask what difference Christianity—and specifically the idea that the Kingdom of heaven is our natural ultimate end—makes to us, as practical and moral agents. I will argue that it makes both a motivational and a substantive difference. In the third part I will ask about the way normativity is related to God’s communication of normative matters to us, and I will do this specifically by asking what kinds of speech acts God engages in in communicating normative matters to us. The standard view is that God communicates to us in commands; however, I will suggest some other possibilities.
|
|
|
98.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Brian Donohue
God and Aristotelian Ethics
|
|
|
99.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Jonathan J. Sanford
Response to Christopher Tollefsen’s “Morality and God”
|
|
|
100.
|
Quaestiones Disputatae:
Volume >
5 >
Issue: 1
Gregory Sadler
Anselmian Moral Theory and the Question of Grounding Morality in God
|
|
|