1.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Charles Péguy
Liberté
|
|
|
2.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
P. Ian Boyd, C.S.B.
Avant-propos de l’éditeur
|
|
|
3.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Patrick Kéchichian
La revue des livres
|
|
|
4.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Brian J. Sudlow
Le Réalisme catholique:
terrain commun entre les lettres catholiques en France et en Angleterre
|
|
|
5.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Philippe Maxence
La France et Chesterton, une « divine entente »
|
|
|
6.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Dermot Quinn
La conversion au Dieu caché:
Chesterton, Claudel et la renaissance de la littérature catholique
|
|
|
7.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
P. Ian Boyd, C.S.B.
Chesterton et les renouveaux littéraires en France et en Angleterre au XXᵉ siècle
|
|
|
8.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Paul Claudel
Adresse de Paul Claudel à G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
9.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Alain Lanavère
1926. Un coup de tonnerre:
Sous le Soleil de Satan
|
|
|
10.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
G. K. Chesterton
G.K. Chesterton et le curé d’Ars
|
|
|
11.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Lettres
|
|
|
12.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
G. K. Chesterton
Comprendre la France
|
|
|
13.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Philippe Maxence
Introduction
|
|
|
14.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
Nouvelles et commentaires
|
|
|
15.
|
The Chesterton Review en Français:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 1
G. K. Chesterton
L’affaire Claudel
|
|
|
16.
|
The Chesterton Review:
Volume >
1 >
Issue: 2
François Rivière
Le Retour de Don Paradox:
Chesterton en France
|
|
|
17.
|
The Chesterton Review:
Volume >
38 >
Issue: 1/2
Paul Claudel
Notre Dame Auxiliatrice
|
|
|
18.
|
The Chesterton Review:
Volume >
38 >
Issue: 3/4
Charles Péguy
Paris
|
|
|
19.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
58 >
Issue: 4
Gilbert Vincent
Au croisement de l’épistémologie et de l’ontologie:
Le concept d’institution chez Ricoeur
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Our analysis deals with the concept of institution presented in the seventh and eighth studies of Paul Ricœur’s Oneself as Another. The judgment on institutions found there is somewhat ambivalent: sometimes institutions are understood as a mediation that establishes society and the individual, sometimes it is suspected of imposing itself like an abusive transcendence and of blocking interpersonal relations. To be sure, one does find, in Ricœur, explanations for this ambivalence. History does show that institutions are “fragile,” that they can fail in their mission—the just distribution of different goods–that they can even be criminal. We intend to show here that the idea of an institution, for Ricœur, is shaped by his contrasting evaluation of two major sociologists, Weber and Durkheim (who seem to serve as a foil). We also consider the many reflections in Ricœur’s text about a “just institution,” which testify to his concern for fairness.
|
|
|
20.
|
Philosophy Today:
Volume >
58 >
Issue: 4
Edouard Jourdain
Justice et utopie:
Lire ensemble Ricœur et Proudhon
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
Ricœur ends his Lectures on Ideology and Utopia by analyzing the works of Saint Simon and Fourier through the lens of the idea of utopia. In taking up these thinkers whom Engels labeled “utopian” socialist, we note that Ricœur did not deal equally with the work of another important socialist: Proudhon. My hypothesis is that it is possible to read Proudhon using Ricœur in that their approaches are similar at a number of points. Fruitful connections can be drawn between the dialectic of the real and ideal developed by Proudhon and Ricœur’s dialectic of ideology and utopia. Both thinkers deal with justice in the form of a certain tension: a tension that for Ricœur (beyond the deontology and teleology found to some extent in the dialectic of ideology and utopia) requires practical wisdom, and a tension that for Proudhon (beyond the ideal and the real) requires an equilibrium of social and political forces.
|
|
|